Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Hong Kong to keep ‘one country, two systems’ model indefinitely, justice minister says" video.

@vitaluna1568 Congrats, you just admitted it was an insult. Instead of engaging in actual dialogue, you resort to name calling instead. Thats what "real" 5 year olds do. Oh and I know what China is "doing" in HK alright. Theyre making sure HK actually fulfils their constitutional duty. For the longest time, HK was meant to create their own "national security law" under Article 23 of HKs mini constitution. But almost 25 of the 50 yrs, HK STILL did not create it. HK failed to do so, so Beijing stepped in. Remember, it was HK that violated the agreement first, not Beijing. And Ill make my point clear again, if it was "one country, one system", HK would be paying China taxes, subjugated by China laws, and forced to use Mandarin and simplified Chinese and ONLY Mandarin and simplified Chinese in schools etc. If you continue saying its not "one country, two system", lets call on China to really make it "one country, one system" to show you what that really looks like
4
@vitaluna1568 I never knew HK was speaking Mandarin and using Simplified Chinese on a daily basis. Do they also follow Mainland China laws and increase their tax to Mainland Chinas level?
3
@Hopper-n5f If its long dead, then lets have HK speak and use Mandarin, and use simplified Chinese, and increase their tax to mainland Chinas level. Or does HK have another system?
2
@ So Malaysians pay Chinese tax? And Use the same Chinese laws? And EVERYTHING is in Mandarin and Simplified Chinese?
2
@ Whats this 5 year old in reference to? Are you trying to insult me? If the answer to my questions is different to Chinas, its means theres 2 systems. Simple as that.
2
@YuvrajSingh-ed4xb So is HK speaking and using Mandarin and use simplified Chinese, and have their taxes increased to mainland Chinas level?
2
@FlyingTiger1989 Whos said its guilty until proven innocent? They obviously have committed a crime and have evidence. Just that you disagree that theyre "crimes" thats all as the wording is quite vague. But vague does not mean there is "no" evidence. And no, according to HK, the numbers were about 350k, not 2mil. Just because "someone" said it was 2mil, doesnt mean its 2mil. HK actually used tech to come to the 350k figure, where did the 2mil figure come from? And of course a British lawyer was denied. What country would allow a foreign lawyer thats not certified by their country to work in their country? And since you dont like to use the word "intention". Let me ask you, if someone "intended" ie "planned" to azzazin8 the president, without committing the action, is that a crime? Let me tell you something, most countries would.
1
@Hopper-n5f And whats "freedom of press"? How is that even measured? If a journalist wants to operate within a certain country, they must abide by the countrys laws and regulations. I might even add, agenda. Just like in the US. Where were all the Pro-PaIeztime, Pro-Ruzzia, Pro-China news on any of the major news channels? Where were you calling them out on that?
1
And whats "freedom of press"? How is that even measured? If a journalist wants to operate within a certain country, they must abide by the countrys laws and regulations. I might even say, agenda. Just like in the US. Where were all the Pro-PaIezdime, Pro-Ruzhya, Pro-China news on any of the major news channels?
1
@aultraman Is the economic model not under a capitalist system?
1