Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Kim Jong-un says Korean reunification no longer possible" video.

  1. @worldmedia1476 China had nothing to do with this before the US stepped in. Its Japan that cause this situation. You could add Russia to the equation too.
    134
  2. Welcome to the internet
    21
  3.  @Cosmo1093  China as a country didnt get involved until the US came. There were only ethnic Korean volunteers from China, they dont represent the country, just like mercenaries dont.
    4
  4.  @45641560456405640563  And how did you come to the conclusion I dont have self respect for myself?
    4
  5. They may have a higher birth rate, but they also have a higher child mortality rate.
    4
  6.  @45641560456405640563  Speak for yourself. You seem to be projecting. So Ill say your words right back at you, "making idiotic comments isn't a great use of your time", "have some self respect".
    3
  7. ​ @Cosmo1093  Trained means nothing. Countries train other countries troops all the time. Providing weapons also mean nothing. Again, countries provide weapon to other countries all the time too. Just look at the US. Training and providing weapons doesnt mean theyre "involved" in the war. Just like all these countries training and providing weapons to Ukraine. Theyre not involved in the war at all. Providing support and directly sending troops in are 2 completely different things. And as mentioned earlier, the only Chinese in NK at this stage were ethnic Korean volunteers. That was the "reinforcement" Stalin and NK received. Volunteers from China. Just like mercenaries of other countries in Ukraine now. They cant represent the country they came from. Theyre there voluntarily. China only got involved when the US came into the picture.
    3
  8. "Wrong side" of history? Whats that suppose to mean? China did whats best in their interest, and that is preventing
    3
  9. the US from encroaching
    3
  10. their borders. If SK won and took over NK. There would be US bases much closer to China than what they wanted. So tell me how thats the "wrong side" of history again
    3
  11. Algorithms acting up. Couldnt comment properly nor tag you in comment above. Its weird for me to reply? Is it weird for you to reply? I dont know about you, but I respond to every respondable comment directed to me. So if you dont want me to respond, then dont say anything. So what will you do?
    3
  12. Whats funny/foolish or not is in the eye of the beholder. All I can say is you are entitled to your opinions. But that doesnt make you right.
    3
  13. Still what? Still responding just like you are? Like I said, I respond to all respondable comments that comes my way.
    3
  14. @awolpeace1781 What? You think he sounds like Majin Buu or something?
    3
  15. ​ @Cosmo1093  "Russia vocally disagrees with you on pretty much every point" Oh? So why isnt Russia at war with all these countries "training" and "providing weapons" to Ukraine? Since theyre supposedly "involved" in the war? 'And to be clear, China was "directly sending troops". Mao ordered that entire divisions (the 164th and 166th divisions) of active-duty PLA soldiers be transferred to North Korea. Is that your definition of "volunteers"?"' Wrong. Its indirectly. The 164th and 166th Division are the ethnic Korean division. They were NOT sent by China under the PLA, they were transferred to a new division called the Peoples Volunteer Army (PVA), and was separately constituted. Mao wanted that, and they were happy to oblige. Wheres the line between "ordered" and being "asked" and you obliged? Either way, you could say this is a legal loophole, just like the above support examples I gave. Training, providing weapons, and sending in volunteers/mercenaries to fight against them will not warrant an attack back from Russia/whoever to countries that provided said support. But all this is besides the point. As mentioned earlier, China did not get involved in the war until the US joined in. The PVA entered Korea on 19 October 1950. Whereas the US joined the Korean war on 27 June 1950. So my point on that China didnt get involved until the US joined still stands.
    2
  16. @NguyenTran-mf9gj No. Its because of different political ideologies.
    1
  17.  @45641560456405640563  Whats the "wrong side" of history? China did whats best in their interest, and that is preventing US from encroaching their borders. If SK won and took over NK. There would be US bases much closer to China than what they wanted. So tell me how thats the "wrong side" of history again
    1
  18. Whats the "wrong side" of history? China did whats best in their interest
    1
  19. "Wrong side" of history? Whats that suppose to mean? China did whats best in their interest, and that is preventing the
    1
  20. the US from encroaching their borders.
    1
  21.  @45641560456405640563  "Wrong side" of history? Whats that suppose to mean? China did whats best in their interest, and that is preventing
    1
  22.  @45641560456405640563  Algorithms acting up. Couldnt comment properly nor tag you in comment above
    1
  23. ​ @45641560456405640563  Algorithms acting up. Couldnt comment properly nor tag you in comment above. Its weird for me to reply? Is it weird for you to reply? I dont know about you, but I respond to every respondable comment directed to me. So if you dont want me to respond, then dont say anything. So what will you do?
    1
  24.  @45641560456405640563  Whats funny/foolish or not is in the eye of the beholder. All I can say is you are entitled to your opinions. But that doesnt make you right.
    1
  25.  @45641560456405640563  Still trying to what? Respond? Just like what you are doing? Do you find yourself pitiable too?
    1
  26. @probably6755 The more you know...
    1
  27. @teng27 So youre telling me WW3 will not happen because of the US? What a joke. The US is the most hostile country on this planet. Theyve destabilised and overthrown more countries than all other countries combined.
    1
  28.  @pineapplesareyummy6352  Where you getting these numbers from? NK themselves? You trust that? Also, thats just child mortality. What about mortality for other ages? Theres a constant struggle to even survive for the mass in such a country.
    1