Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "" video.

@yichenyin7138 Nope. But since its under 50%, the majority of Taiwan didnt vote for him. So he cant represent "most" Taiwanese
22
@SoldierZHornet Fun fact: the government of TW, Republic of CHINA, claims to be the country called China
4
@cy4330 The presidential election in the US isnt based on the popular vote. The presidential election is based off the electoral vote, and trump won 58% of the votes.
1
@yichenyin7138 "So what"? I made a factual statement. Why do factual statements need a "so what" remark? And I never said anything about representing the WHOLE of TW. I said MOST of TW. Understand the difference between the words.
1
@yichenyin7138 I made a factual statement, and an objective response. And thats "crying" to you? I suggest you use words you understand. If you insist that I was so-called "crying", then quote me where I was apparently "crying". Bet you cant. And I didnt elect no one. So dont talk as if I partook in that. Im just stating the facts. I dont need to side with any party to make a factual statement.
1
@yichenyin7138 You seem to have trouble comprehending English (and numbers). Not once did I mention 40%. YOU did. So how am I "obsessed" with that number if I never even mentioned it? And this is what you said: "if you don't like him, just elect another guy, and enjoy another bunch of people crying like a baby, just like what you're doing now" The last part, "just like what you're doing now" means you claim that I am "crying". So dont try and wiggle your way out of that one. Also, you need to stop with the baseless assumptions. Who says either party can represent me? Who says Im even from TW? Like I said, I made a factual statement, and one doesnt need to side with any party (or even to be from TW) to make a factual statement. Ill say your words right back at you: "maybe I was too optimistic about your logical thinking level"
1
You seem to have trouble comprehending English (and numbers). Not once did I mention 40%. YOU did. So how am I "obsessed" with that number if I never even mentioned it? And this is what you said: "if you don't like him, just elect another guy, and enjoy another bunch of people crying like a baby, just like what you're doing now" The last part, "just like what you're doing now" means you claim that I am "crying". So dont try and wiggle your way out of that one. Also, you need to stop with the baseless assumptions. Who says either party can represent me? Who says Im even from TW? Like I said, I made a factual statement, and one doesnt need to side with any party (or even to be from TW) to make a factual statement. Ill say your words right back at you: "maybe I was too optimistic about your logical thinking level"
1
@yichenyin7138 Couldnt tag my comment
1
@yichenyin7138 Who said I sympathise with them? I merely answered a question you posed. Answering a question with factual statements mean Im standing with them? What an uneducated remark. If you feel disgusted seeing your own words quoted, then think twice about what and how you say your words. Youve said many wrong things in our short interaction already. And clearly you know nothing about democracy if you think Person A winning the election of Country X can represent ALL the people of country X. Person A can only represent their party at most. So NO ONE can represent "MOST" of the TWnese if they didnt get MOST of the votes. Understand? Too bad, I honestly think you dont have the logical capacity to understand. Youre too dead set on one way of thinking. I find it absurd someone with your limited mental capacity is talking down on others.
1
Who said I sympathise with them? I merely answered a question you posed. Answering a question with factual statements mean Im standing with them? What an uneducated remark. If you feel disgusted seeing your own words quoted, then think twice about what and how you say your words. Youve said many wrong things in our short interaction already. And clearly you know nothing about democracy if you think Person A winning the election of Country X can represent ALL the people of country X. Person A can only represent their party at most. So NO ONE can represent "MOST" of the TWnese if they didnt get MOST of the votes. Understand? Too bad, I honestly think you dont have the logical capacity to understand. Youre too dead set on one way of thinking. I find it absurd someone with your limited mental capacity is talking down on others.
1
@yichenyin7138 Couldnt tag comment again
1