Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Interview With Ren Zhengfei, Founder And CEO Of Chinese Telecom Giant Huawei | TIME" video.

  1. 15
  2. 6
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7. ​@blue runner "The burden is on you to prove they are not controlled/owned by ccp" That is not for you to decide. If youre going to make a claim you need to provide evidence to that claim. Were you not taught this in university? Or am I speaking with someone here without proper sourcing education? And my message doesnt seem to be getting across to you. Are you turning a blind eye on US companies following orders from the US government? And we are not talking about simply a "ban". We are talking about Google following orders from the US government to cease providing licenses and software updates to a specific company without their masters permission. So they still can work with Huawei, just with the US governments permission. That in essence is being controlled. "You need to understand the difference between following the law and being controlled" And you need to understand if the laws states that you must follow the governments orders, then youre effectively being controlled. How is that any different from what the US is doing and what China is doing? Its the same in every country. "Even ccp doesn't deny it" Just because you dont deny something, doesnt mean its true. You can walk into the gym and call clearly jacked up people "small". If they dont deny that theyre small, doesnt mean they are. Most jacked up people will just chuckle and ignore you. "Tell me who are Huaweird's owners and who are the board of directors?" Whats the point of asking thing question? Even if I told you, you're not going to believe me anyway am I right? Who are we kidding here?
    3
  8. @blue runner Seems like Im speaking with only a high school educated person with no proper sourcing etiquette and education. Thats fine. You can learn now. Its never too late to learn. When person A makes a claim, person A must have evidence to back that claim up. It is not on the onus of person B to provide evidence to reject that claim. Otherwise, person A can make the claim "Trump sexually assaulted Jill", and it must be true if person B cannot find evidence to prove he didnt. If youre from the US, then you should know the phrase that one is "innocent until proven guilty". Same situation applies here. Unless you have credible evidence to back your claim up, what you say is not true, just another opinion on the internet. "No need to type so much garbage. I will believe any facts provided here" If you think providing logical reasoning is garbage, then you are garbage. Oh facts were provided here. You just dont believe them. Youre still turning a blind eye on how Google is being controlled by the US government. And how doe you think the NSA spies on people? Its because they secretly ordered telecom and phone companies involved to give them a back door to spy on them! These are facts! Do you believe them as you said you will? "They have to do whatever ccp tells them to including disclosing private data. Even the communist law says so" Seems like you just described what the US does. Did you forget about Snowden? Or are you turning a blind eye on wikileaks as well? "just tell me who Huawierd's owners and the board of directors are if you don't think its owned by the government. As of 2019, the members of the board are Liang Hua, Guo Ping, Xu Zhijun, Hu Houkun, Meng Wanzhou, Ding Yun, Yu Chengdong, Wang Tao, Xu Wenwei, Chen Lifang, Peng Zhongyang, He Tingbo, Li Yingtao, Ren Zhengfei, Yao Fuhai, Tao Jingwen, and Yan Lida. And its wholly owned by 100000+ employees of their company. Now that Ive answered your question. Did that make a difference? Are you going to believe what I said now? Lets here what you have to say.
    2
  9. 1
  10. 1