Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Joe Biden warns Xi Jinping against Taiwan interference" video.

@buildmotosykletist1987 Fun fact: Taiwans government officially claims to be the county called China, and even once sat in the UN representing the country called China. Also, if you bothered reading "Taiwans" constitution, it clearly refers to Taiwan as a province of China.
3
'They can't "reunify" when they have never been "unified"' Try Qing Dynasty. Its still China. They were unified then. "If the CCP i-vades Taiwan they will face the entire free world and lose the battle" Wishful thinking. The whole world (including Taiwan) agrees that Mainland China and Taiwan island are
3
@ArabicReja973 Fun fact: Taiwans government officially claims to be the county called China, and even once sat in the UN representing the country called China
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "Fun question: Who rules Taiwan ?" Fun answer: The government of Republic of CHINA, that claims to be the country called CHINA rules Taiwan. Got any more fun questions? I got a lot of fun answers for you
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "Exactly. Taiwan is ruled by the ROC NOT the PRC. The PRC has no claim to Taiwan and never has" Theres a difference between "government" and "country". Theyre both different governments that claim to be the SAME country. Its called the Chinese Civil War for a reason. Civil war meaning war within the SAME country. So Taiwan is not a "separate" country, they both claim to be the very same country called "China".
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "The CCP has never ruled Taiwan and has no legitimate claim to Taiwan" So you asking PRC to finish the civil war? To finish off ROC? Because if they wanted to they can, but they prefer peaceful reunification. And thats not how sovereignty works. Its based on recognition by the world. Otherwise large countries like Russia, Canada, USA, Brazil, India etc cant claims sovereignty over many parts of their land as theyve never truly ruled those lands. They just drew a line of the map and say hey thats mine
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 'They can't "reunify" when they have never been "unified"' Try Qing Dynasty. Its still China. They were unified then. "If the CCP invades Taiwan they will face the entire free world and lose the battle" Wishful thinking. The whole world (including Taiwan) agrees that Mainland China and Taiwan island are part of the same country called China. No country in this world can interfere with another countrys internal affair. Even UKvsRU no country in the "free world" you speak of dare to intervenes, and thats not even an internal affair. What do you got to say about that huh? "The rest of your comment is nonsensical" Facts are not nonsense. There literally never stepped foot on every inch of their sovereignty territory before and yet they claim it as theirs. "BTW; When will the CCP finally build a working old tech carrier ???" Irrelevant.
1
Try Qing Dynasty. Its still China. They were unified then. Wishful thinking. The whole world (including Taiwan) agrees that Mainland China and Taiwan island are part of the same country called China. No country in this world can interfere with another countrys internal affair. Even UKvsRU no country in the "free world" you speak of dare to intervenes, and thats not even an internal affair. What do you got to say about that huh? Facts are not nonsense. There literally never stepped foot on every inch of their sovereignty territory before and yet they claim it as theirs. And last point was irrelevant.
1
part of the same country called China. No country in this world can interfere with another countrys internal affair. Even UKvsRU
1
no country in the "free world" you speak of dare to intervenes, and thats not even an internal affair. What do you got to say about that huh? "The rest of your comment is nonsensical" Facts are not nonsense. There literally never stepped foot on every inch of their sovereignty territory before and
1
yet they claim it as theirs. "BTW; When will the CCP finally build a working old tech carrier ???" Irrelevant.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 'Why did you avoid discussion about your carriers and "stealth" fighters ???' Because its irrelevant. We are talking about politics and legality here, not military. But even if you want to talk about the military, same response: "irrelevant". 1) A jet can fly from Mainland China to Taiwan back and forth 5 times without refuelling. Whats the point of an aircraft carrier here? Use your brain. 2) ROC doesnt even have 1, and PRC has 3. Again your point? If youre trying to mock PRC, youre mocking ROC too. Whose side are you on? 3) The West will not join in on a PRC and ROC conflict. They wont even join in on the latest 2 international conflicts, what makes you think they will with a internal/domestic conflict? 4) And to top that off, have you never heard of maneuverable hypersonic missiles (aka aircraft carrier destroyers) these days? Aircraft carriers are now redundant in war. At least to China and Russia. Even the US does not have maneuverable hypersonic missiles. Also, you did not mentioned "stealth" fighters at all, so how can I "avoid" it? And "ROTFL"? Who uses that these days? Did you just come out of prison or something? The world has stopped using ROFL for about a decade. Let alone a ROTFL... 'I'll finish that for you; "separate countries."' I already finished it. Read again. And if theyre "separate countries" then why does Taiwan teach their people that the conflict between PRC and ROC is that of a civil war? Civil war meaning war within the SAME country.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 So you cant win a political and legal argument so now you try with military? Youll still lose to me. "The CCP does not have any operational old tech, diesel carriers. None...The third carrier is still being built" Again, it seems like you just came out of prison or something. Your information is out of date. They have 2 operational aircraft carriers now. And even though third is like 99% completed, that doesnt change the fact that they have 3 and ROC has 0. Again, what is your point? You trying to mock ROC? "The 001 can't launch any jets and 002 can only launch lightly fueled J15's and no others" Right. An aircraft carrier that can carry jets but cant launch any jets...makes sense... And the J-15 has a range of 3500km whereas Taiwan is just about 150km away, why would they use anything else other than these so-called "lightly fueled" jets? No, a better question is, why would they need an aircraft carrier against Taiwan in the first place? Theres no need for PRC to use aircraft carriers against Taiwan, so honestly not sure why youre even bringing that up. Aircraft carriers are for countries that go to war half way across the world, not for something thats less than a quarter of the distance between San Fran and LA. "There is only one hypersonic missile that can hit a target and it's Australian designed. The CCP don't have any that have actually hit a target" Right. Seems like you know more than US intelligence. Guess the US got scared for not reason then. "A CCP plane can't fly to Taiwan 5 times as it will be shot down on the first attempt" Sure. And going by your logic, whats the point of aircraft carriers again if theyre gonna get shot down first attempt anyways? "The world will not stand by and let a dictator invade a democracy" * cough * Russia * cough * Sorry what? "The USA and Japan and Philippines have stated they will defend Taiwan so you are obviously wrong" The US double talks. They say they will, just like they would with Ukraine, but look what happened? And Japan will only join if the US joins. And lets be real here, the US wont be sending their troops to die when its a sure-fire win for PRC. And PH wont nor can do shit to China.
1
the US joins. And lets be real here, the US wont
1
So you cant win a political and legal argument so now you try with military? Youll still lose to me. "The CCP does not have any operational old tech, diesel carriers. None...The third carrier is still being built" Again, it seems like you just came out of prison or something. Your information is out of date. They have 2 operational aircraft carriers now. And even though third is like 99% completed, that doesnt change the fact that they have 3 and ROC has 0. Again, what is your point? You trying to mock ROC? "The 001 can't launch any jets and 002 can only launch lightly fueled J15's and no others" Right. An aircraft carrier that can carry jets but cant launch any jets...makes sense... And the J-15 has a range of 3500km whereas Taiwan is just about 150km away, why would they use anything else other than these so-called "lightly fueled" jets? No, a better question is, why would they need an aircraft carrier against Taiwan in the first place? Theres no need for PRC to use aircraft carriers against Taiwan, so honestly not sure why youre even bringing that up. Aircraft carriers are for countries that go to war half way across the world, not for something thats less than a quarter of the distance between San Fran and LA. "There is only one hypersonic missile that can hit a target and it's Australian designed. The CCP don't have any that have actually hit a target" Right. Seems like you know more than US intelligence. Guess the US got scared for not reason then. "A CCP plane can't fly to Taiwan 5 times as it will be shot down on the first attempt" Sure. And going by your logic, whats the point of aircraft carriers again if theyre gonna get shot down first attempt anyways? "The world will not stand by and let a dictator invade a democracy" * cough * Russia * cough * Sorry what? "The USA and Japan and Philippines have stated they will defend Taiwan so you are obviously wrong" The US double talks. They say they will, just like they would with Ukraine, but look what happened? And Japan will only join if the
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 So you cant win a political and legal argument so now you try with military? Youll still lose to me. "The CCP does not have any operational old tech, diesel carriers. None...The third carrier is still being built" Again, it seems like you just came out of prison or something. Your information is out of date. They have 2 operational aircraft carriers now. And even though third is like 99% completed, that doesnt change the fact that they have 3 and ROC has 0. Again, what is your point? You trying to mock ROC? "The 001 can't launch any jets and 002 can only launch lightly fueled J15's and no others" Right. An aircraft carrier that can carry jets but cant launch any jets...makes sense... And the J-15 has a range of 3500km whereas Taiwan is just about 150km away, why would they use anything else other than these so-called "lightly fueled" jets? No, a better question is, why would they need an aircraft carrier against Taiwan in the first place? Theres no need for PRC to use aircraft carriers against Taiwan, so honestly not sure why youre even bringing that up. Aircraft carriers are for countries that go to war half way across the world, not for something thats less than a quarter of the distance between San Fran and LA. "There is only one hypersonic missile that can hit a target and it's Australian designed. The CCP don't have any that have actually hit a target" Right. Seems like you know more than US intelligence. Guess the US got scared for not reason then. "A CCP plane can't fly to Taiwan 5 times as it will be shot down on the first attempt" Sure. And going by your logic, whats the point of aircraft carriers again if theyre gonna get shot down first attempt anyways? "The world will not stand by and let a dictator invade a democracy" * cough * Russia * cough * Sorry what? "The USA and Japan and Philippines have stated they will defend Taiwan so you are obviously wrong" The US double talks. They say they will, just like they would with Ukraine, but look what happened? And Japan will only join if the
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 the US joins. And lets be real here, the US would not be sending their troops to die when its a sure-fire win for PRC. And PH wont nor can do shit to CN
1
the US joins. And lets be real here, the US would not be sending their troops to die when its a sure-fire win for PRC. And PH wont nor can do shit to CN
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Above
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "So you've run out of BS. OKaayyy" I wrote so much and you say I ran out of BS? "oKaAyYyY" Thats exactly what someone that lost an argument would say. You lose.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Read above you fool
1
@AhmetTekin101 "Taiwan is an independent country. No country in the world will interfere into Taiwanese internal affairs, including China" Your "Taiwan" claims to be the country called China, and once sat in the UN to represent the country called China. The matter between ROC and PRC is a matter of civil war taught by both sides of the strait called the Chinese Civil War. Civil war meaning war within the SAME country. Tell me how if Taiwan is another country why they call it a "civil war", why they claim to be the country called "China", and why they refer to Taiwan as a province of China in their very own constitution. Go on, Im waiting.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Who said the word "above" was the argument? Im telling you to read above
1
@AhmetTekin101 "Would you be a person who will accept the truth? If yes, I'll go on. If not, there is no point" Of course. Im always for facts. The real question is, are you a person who will accept the truth? "PRC and China are 2 names of the same country. Similarly, ROC and Taiwan" No. That is the name of the state, not "country". PRC/ROC is the name of the state, China is the name of the country. Both PRC and ROC claim to be the SAME country called "China". Your "Taiwan" also claims to be the very same country that PRC claims to be, China. I have no interest playing mental gymnastics with semantics if thats where youre going.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "Your arguments above have all been destroyed" None my point were even touched upon, so how can they be "destroyed" if no one talked about them? You lost again.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "Let's look at just one argument. So when has the CCP ruled Taiwan ?" Quote me where I said "CCP" or "PRC" ruled Taiwan. I said Taiwans very own government, Republic of CHINA, claims to be the country called CHINA, once sat in the UN representing the country called CHINA, and their constitution refers to Taiwan a a province of CHINA. Therefore, they are part of CHINA. The issue between PRC and ROC is a matter of civil war. Civil war meaning war between the SAME country called CHINA, aka an INTERNAL affair. This is taught to people of BOTH ROC and PRC. I stated that very clearly already with no room for any misunderstandings. Now, what are you so confused about?
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "So the PRC (one of the youngest countries on earth) has never ruled Taiwan, therefor has no claim to Taiwan" So you agree that Taiwan is part of China? Just not PRC? The Chinese Civil War is technically still ongoing as no peace treaty nor armistice was ever signed. But given how PRC effectively won the war (even though its still technically ongoing), it is recognised by the world that PRC is the successor of ROC to govern China (including Taiwan), thats why the world recognises Taiwan as part of China.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "No Taiwan is not part of China and never has been. You are getting desperate making such claims" Oh? If Taiwan is not part of China then why is their government called Republic of CHINA?Why does their constitution refer to Taiwan as a province of China? And why did Taiwans government once sat in the UN representing the country called China? Stating the facts is "desperate"? More like youre desperate in denying reality.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "It's because the Republic of China ruled China" Of course Republic of China ruled China. Its founded as the country called China. And since you agree that Taiwan is part of Republic of China, then Taiwan is part of China. Simple as that. Remember, the government of your "Taiwan", Republic of China, claims to be the country called China (let that sink in); once sat in the UN representing the country called China (let that sink in again); and Taiwan is part of Republic of China (let that sink in one more time). Therefore Taiwan is part of China. Civil war broke out in China, but ROC is still ROC (not ROT), they still claim to be the country called China, its in their name and constitution. Thats why I asked you: "So you agree that Taiwan is part of China? Just not PRC?" And you said no. Youre contradicting yourself here.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Wow, its you thats not making any sense. "Are you simple?" is not proper English used in the English-sphere. And here you are trying to mock my English. Im a native English speaker alright. So theres nothing wrong with my English. How about YOU reread my comments? Not once did I speak about PRC "ruling" Taiwan yet you keep bringing it up as if thats my point. Read properly. Taiwan is part of ROC. ROC claims to be the country called China. Therefore Taiwan is part of China. Simple as that. Its in their name, Republic of CHINA. Case closed
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 "LOL, read your comments above. English is not your first language. ... I hope, if it is, you are in real strife" Alright Mr Are-you-simple. I see youre trying to get personal with me now since you cant win an argument with me. Im quite confident on my English, so Ill play your game. Quote me. Quote me where my English supposedly is subpar by your standards. Go on. Im waiting.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 typos dont count
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Boohoo I accidentally typed an "a". Like I said, typos dont count. My grammar is perfect. Eyes and fingers, maybe not. If anyones grammar here is subpar, its yours. There are no spaces before question marks. Ellipsis are just 3 dots (...), not ". ...". And sentences do not start off with a colon. And wrong assumption. I dont speak Mandarin.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Youre contradicting yourself again. How is your grammar "perfect" when I literally just provided a list of you incorrectly using grammar?
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Wrong. Incorrect use of punctuation IS incorrect use of grammar. You didnt know punctuation is part of grammar? And here you have the audacity to say I lost "again", when none of your points have countered ANY of my points. Its YOU that lost, again. And no one with so-called "impeccable" English asks "are you simple?" Thats Slavic grammar. You a Slav?
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Not according to Google. And having a space before a question mark is wrong. Starting a sentence off with a colon is also wrong. Being wrong so much in English does not make your English "impeccable".
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 It is wrong. Stop trying to justify that you are wrong. A simple search can verify that for you. Only people that are wrong fear verifying information and shame others for doing so.
1
Ive already listed out your errors multiple times. Space before question mark is an error. Starting a sentence with a colon is also an error. Just because you dont know these are errors doesnt mean they arent errors. A simple search can verify that for you, but too bad you fear being wrong so much you refuse to. Ignorance at its finest. But thats ok. Even if you dont wish to it, anyone reading will know, and know what type of person you are.
1
You couldnt win a political and legal argument with me, so you started a military one. I played your game. And you lost that as well. Then you tried making it personal, mocking me and my English. Too bad that also backfired. You dont even have a point anymore. Just admit it. Youve lost.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Ive checkmated you. Gracefully accept it and move on like a real man.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Wow. Unbelievable. You are deeluusional. You won nothing. Ive answered ALL your questions above already. I literally countered all the points youve raised. Its you that hasnt responded back to my counter-points. Not responding back to my counter-points means you got nothing better to say. In other words, you got destroyed.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 For the 4th time, space before question mark is an error. Starting a sentence with a colon is also an error. You claim its just punctuation, but punctuation is an aspect of grammar! Ive already given you my answer and told you to verify it yourself. If you refused to do it, thats on you, not me. But for any readers reading this, heres whats Googles top link on this says: 'Is Punctuation Part of Grammar? Grammar is the construction of sentences and paragraphs and how they form meaning. One aspect of grammar is “punctuation”, which relates to the symbols used to add meaning to sentences. Many grammatical rules cannot be followed without punctuation; therefore, it does form part of “grammar.” The Cambridge Dictionary states that punctuation is “symbols used to separate phrases.” These symbols have many functions, including informing whether a sentence is a question or exclamation. They also inform when to pause and signal the end of a sentence. Essentially “grammar” is the blueprint of the rules of the English language and how to put words together, and “punctuation” is one “branch” of these rules. Some people argue that ”punctuation” is not part of “grammar” because “grammar” exists in spoken English, but punctuation doesn’t. However, a person’s ability to speak well and without “grammatical” errors is intrinsically linked to a basic understanding and competence in written English’s grammatical rules, including punctuation. In some grading systems and rubrics, “punctuation” is a separate category. However, errors in this section would directly affect the “grammar” section of the grading because the sentences would not be constructed correctly. For example, misusing commas and semi-colons would result in “run-sentences” or “sentence fragments”, which are classed as “grammatical errors.”' Much like the following statement: I helped my uncle, Jack, off a horse vs I helped my uncle jack off a horse. Punctuation is an aspect of grammar. Oh, and your question "are you simple?" is also a subpar English as well. Not the "impeccable" English you thought you had.
1
For the 4th time, space before question mark is an error. Starting a sentence with a colon is also an error. You claim its just punctuation, but punctuation is an aspect of grammar! Ive already given you my answer and told you to verify it yourself. If you refused to do it, thats on you, not me. But for any readers reading this, heres whats Googles top link on this says: 'Is Punctuation Part of Grammar? Grammar is the construction of sentences and paragraphs and how they form meaning. One aspect of grammar is “punctuation”, which relates to the symbols used to add meaning to sentences. Many grammatical rules cannot be followed without punctuation; therefore, it does form part of “grammar.” The Cambridge Dictionary states that punctuation is “symbols used to separate phrases.” These symbols have many functions, including informing whether a sentence is a question or exclamation. They also inform when to pause and signal the end of a sentence...'
1
Continuing quote: 'Essentially “grammar” is the blueprint of the rules of the English language and how to put words together, and “punctuation” is one “branch” of these rules. Some people argue that ”punctuation” is not part of “grammar” because “grammar” exists in spoken English, but punctuation doesn’t. However, a person’s ability to speak well and without “grammatical” errors is intrinsically linked to a basic understanding and competence in written English’s grammatical rules, including punctuation. In some grading systems and rubrics, “punctuation” is a separate category. However, errors in this section would directly affect the “grammar” section of the grading because the sentences would not be constructed correctly. For example, misusing commas and semi-colons would result in “run-sentences” or “sentence fragments”, which are classed as “grammatical errors.”' Much like the following statement: I helped my uncle, Jack, off a horse vs I helped my uncle jack off a horse. Punctuation is an aspect of grammar.
1
@buildmotosykletist1987 Oh, and your question "are you simple?" is also subpar English as well. Not the "impeccable" English you thought you had.
1