Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Why Can't India Compete with China? @visualeconomiken" video.

@zabinzsur Says something you dont like = Chinese bot. Righto! Also, how many of the scooters are electric? What proportion? Whatever it is, it pales in comparison with Shenzhen. Theres barely any pollution in Shenzhen nowadays.
25
@albertjoseph4604 Chinas government MADE their population speak Mandarin. Prior to modern China, every single different region spoke a different language. And the Chinese government wants everyone to think that the country is 90% "Han". Yet the Han from the north are genetically different to those Hans from the south. They call it Northern Han and Southern Han, but realistically theyre 2 different ethnic groups. So no, not homogeneous at all.
7
@johnvp3606 "About 70% of the Han people in China today have O2 paternal genes, which are the paternal genes of the Han Dynasty royal family" That is not true. Who said that the O2 haplogroup is from the Han Dynasty royal family? Thats just wishful thinking. Where do you think they got their genes from? You think other Chinese during the Han Dynasty outside of the royal family did not have the O2 haplogroup gene? The biggest difference is not the maternal or paternal genes, but the overall genetic admixture. Its so different that Northern Han and Southern Han are a completely different category when it comes to ethnicity.
2
@johnvp3606 You dont seem to understand my point. My point is not that the Han Dynasty royal family did not have the haplogroup O2. My point is that theyre NOT the ONLY ones with the O2 genes from that era. Other people in the era also had O2. In fact, O2 existed since the Neolithic caveman era in China prior to the existence of any Chinese Dynasty! Han Chinese today are descendants from the ancient cavemans, not descendants from the Han royal family. Do you understand? And although O2 is the dominant haplogroup in Han Chinese, about ~60% of Han has it, but its even more dominant in other ethnicities, like Nyishi (94%), Adi (89%), Tamang (87%), Kachari/Boro (85%) Apatani (82%) Ranha (77%) Naga (76%), Naiman (68%) etc. This is what happens when you read "articles" on topics you dont truly understand about. Your research is biased and leaving a lot of information out. Your research was on Han/China and Han/China only. It doesnt include other ethnicities outside of China. This is how information can easily be misinterpreted and misconstrued. And you dont know what youre talking about when you mean Northern Han people are "purer". When in fact Northern Han Chinese have been heavily mixed in with the Mongols and Manchurians for over half a millennium. And youre comparing Northern Han to Southern Han, are a completely different ethnicity, so ofcourse theyre "different". Its like comparing Koreans to Japanese. And saying Koreans are "purer" than Japanese. Sounds ridiculous right? Yeh thats what youre doing. Based on your logic, the ethnicities Ive listed above with higher concentrations of haplogroup O2 in their people means theyre are "purer" than Han Chinese right?
2
@fdfddff-y7j I have no qualms with most Han people containing haplogroup O2. My issue is the statement that haplogroup O2 are from the Han Dynasty royal family.
1