Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Eric Shawn reports: Russia and China 'the greatest threats'" video.

Ryuseiken Kyokushin "Spying and hacking the US are ok?" Its been reported that there are US spies in China. How do you know it was China that spied and "hacked" US first? "50% of isis weapons came from China" And the US supplied over 60% of weapons to the most unstable region on planet Earth, the middle east, further fueling the war. And this was long before ISIS was even a thing. "China arming NK is cool right?" And US arming SK and Japan isnt? Not gonna take sides but what are guns gonna do? It was the Russians that helped NK develop nuclear weapons. Why dont you talk about that? "Invading the south seas and bullied the US allies is cool right?" China claimed the islands in the SCS long before international law of the seas even existed. If youre gonna say China should "give back" those islands to the nearest countries then you better support the Americans giving back the whole continent to the natives.
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin Like I said, I'm not going to be taking sides on the issue of NK/SK. But to say that China is arming NK, you make it sound like theyre supplying NK with weapons of mass destruction that can threaten the world. NK's most destructive weapons were developed by themselves with the help of the Russians, nothing to do with China. Infact, China doesnt even want them to have nuclear capabilities. "About the US arming middle east, u purposely left out Russia arming them as well" Who armed who first? If youre gonna supply a country with advanced weaponry to destabilise a region, then there needs to be an opposing force to counter balance that region. Theres no need for me to mention Russia when it was clearly the US that destabilised the region first. "Oh, did i mention that the US also armed China to fight off the Jap?" Oh yeh? What %? Can it compare to Russia's aid? If youre going to go off topic then might as well bring in the Vietnam war. Classified documents has been revealed that the US' involvement in the Vietnam war was to topple China. Why dont you talk about how the US tried to destroy China first hmm? "China signed to agree to cut NK but still armed them; that means China rigged contract. That’s not wrong?" As far as I know, China did not breach that contract. There may be loopholes. But loopholes are loopholes. China didnt do anything wrong.
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin "China declined saying they didnt have any part in those companies. Dont tell me companies in China function without the ccp’s regulation. If u do business in china’s, u know that the ccp always plants their people to that company to keep an eye on, let alone companies that have nuke materials. That is china’s policy" Seems like you know everything about China and companies in China. Might as well say Apple and Microsoft as well as every other US company in China is also deliberately leaking IP to China since its CCP regulated...Go on, make that claim. "Of course soviet went to middle east first and armed them" There is absolutely no information out that that Russia destabilised the middle east. If anyone, its the US. Theres literally millions of articles out there on that. "What classified documents has been revealed the US involvement in vietnam is to topple China? What world are u living?" Oh you dont know? The US feared that communism would spread all over the world like the domino effect. They though intervening in the Vietnam war would be a great opportunity to topple China. Theres too many declassified documents on this war, couldnt find the exact one for you. "Bu the way, khmer rogue had been attacking the southern vietnam by china’s order long before china stepped in. They attacked southern vietnam villages and beheaded poor innocent people. Ask old people in the south vietnam if they were terrified when they heard of red khmer rogue and the word “kat kbal” in cambodia. " You somehow conveniently missed out on the bit that the US also supported the Khmer rogue...
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin You have absolutely no evidence that China knows "everything" about those companies. Pure speculation based on selective knowledge. China lied about A chinese company selling "nuke materials" to NK"?? The fact that you said that means you believe anything the media tells you without doing your due diliegence. The Chinese company in question sold "aluminum ingots, aluminum oxide, ammonium paratungstate and tungsten trioxide" to NK. ALL of which is used in everyday life. Saying that a Chinese company is selling metal/chemicals as "nuke materials" to NK is as ignorant as saying "oh theyre selling metal, metal which can be used as the casing for a nuke. Therefore they are selling nuke material..." "Lately, china and russia ships were caught selling oil to NK which is the violation of sanction agreement" Like I said, loopholes are loopholes. There was no violation of any sanction agreements. If you knew there was a loophole to lower your tax by half, legally, I bet you would take advantage of it too. "The US feared communism would spread like a domino effect? Ehere did u get that?" A simple google search will suffice. And its not just the US that feared it. "The Southern vietnam was fighting against the khmer rogue. The US was supporting the southern vietnam. U appear to know nothing but rather try to drive away from the original arguments with me and the other guys" I appear to know nothing? And want to drive away from the original argument? What a hypocrite you are. It was YOU that brought up the Khmer rogue issue. If anyone that appears to not know anyone it is you. You seem to know a little bit, but not the whole story. There war spanned many years, there were regime changes. In the beginning the US supported South Vietnam. Once Communist North conquered the South. They switched to support the Khmer rogue. https://bennorton.com/wikileaks-us-khmer-rouge-support/ http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/US_PolPot.html https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/16/who-supported-the-khmer-rouge/ https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/pol/polpotmontclarion0498.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_United_States_support_for_the_Khmer_Rouge
1
Read carefully: "the U.S. bombing of Cambodia during 1970-75 killed as many or more Cambodians as Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge ever did" US didnt do anything wrong? Yea, invading, meddling with other countries’ affairs... mean nothing eh? Sound familiar? Why just point fingers at 1 country. When the country youre defending is just as bad. Or even worst when you count all the wars, invasions and countrys the US has meddled with all these years.
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin "FBI and UN have reported China sold nuke materials go NK. Those materials above u said were just parts of many that u didnt mention. Nice try. You are so hypocritical. I'll just play your game. "Back that shit up!" China and Russia were caught selling oil to NK and those are clear violations of the sanction agreements. "Back that shit up!" "Logic! Use it!" Exactly. PRC signed the agreement. Not Company ABC. "Logic! Use it!" "It is laughable to cite from wikipedia as real fact. Dont u know it is not to be used as evidence when u submit your researches?" Submit my researches? Do you expect me to use Harvard referencing as well? The sites I linked were references. If youre not a denier of facts then you should do your own due dilegence and research. To disclaim wikipedia and anything from there as laughable is pure ignorance. Use it as reference and do your own research. "Why would they support the Khmer rogue when they already didnt want to further funding for that war? To stop Communist Vietnam from potential expanding even further. US intelligence is smarter than you think. They know things you dont know. "Plus, Khmer rogue was another communist, what would that give them?" Khmer Rogue was as communist as Democratic Peoples Rupublic of Korea is democratic. Theyre just names of parties. Just like the "communist" party of China. Theyre arguably more capitalist than communist. KR dont claim to be communist, and they discriminate between races. Not everyone is equal. "US bombed and killed more than Khmer rogue ever did??? You kidding me? Red Khmer rogue killed millions and you slapped that statement in without shame? You probably believe Hitler was worse than Mao. Fun fact, Mao killed more than Hitler and Stalling ever did" Ahh there you are again going off topic. If I dont mention this you probably wouldve though I was the one going off topic like last time. Heres another fun fact for you, China had more than 10x the population of Germany. Ofcourse more wouldve died in China. And Maos numbers include those that died from famine due to poor regulations. Personally I wouldnt call that murder. But whatever. No one knows how many they killed. The media likes to exaggerate claims, especially from ruthless killers to make them sound even more ruthless. But let me say this, theres not ONE credible source out there that knows exactly how many the regimes killed nor how many the US killed. Theyre all numbers that can be made up to better suit their story (propaganda even if you will)! "Let me state it again: China attacked Taibet, killed Tibetans bullies Taiwan, attacked Vietnam, invaded the south seas, hacks the US, steals technologies, backed NK regimes, disturbs the Indian seas, sold weapons to Burma to kill muslims, harvest organs.... yea China did nothing wrong they said China attacked Tibet? Or did foreign invaders like Japan and Europe invaded China and destabilised China and its control over its outer borders? Tibet was part of China longer than USA was even a country. Bullies Taiwan? You mean Republic of China right? The civil war between PRC and ROC never officially ended. You can almost jokingly say theyre showing their political enemy compassion by not completely annihilating them. Attacked Vietnam? Yeh they also helped Vietnam, something people never really mention. Invaded the South Seas? The Chinese laid claims on the SCS before internation law of the seas even existed. If youre gonna call out China for "invading the south seas" before internation laws even existed, then you should also call out the Americans for invading America... Hacks the US, steals technologies? When Whites steal its okay, when China does its not okay? Throughout history who stole from who more?! Backed NK regimes? Absolutely nothing wrong with backing an "ally" right? Isnt that what the US say all the time to justify aggression? Disturbs the Indian seas? China is learning from the US. They do it all the time. Sold weapons to Burma to kill muslims? If Company A sells you a knife, do they worry that you might use it to murder someone? No. Business is business. They could care less what they do with their weapons as long as its sold. Just like the US.
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin 'We talked about China has eyes and ears all companies inside it. Nuke materials are serious and important that China has to control it closely. No way in hell China “has nothing to do with it.”' Where is your evidence that china sold nuke materials to NK? Link me a credible source. Unless you find us a credible source, what you speak of is propaganda. "The same lie they said they didnt know anything about the ship that sent oil to NK" Link me a source that the Chinese GOVERNMENT (you know, the ones you signed the agreement) sold oil to NK. People and Businesses are different to the government. If the CCP is so powerful that it has eyes and ears in EVERY SINGLE company, then why does corruption still exist in China? Corruption is illegal there. Shouldnt they have eyes and ears everywhere within the government too? They should know 100% of whats happening right? Lemme give you a hint, "eyes and ears" arent perfect. Its not absolute. Nothing is. "So, finally You ADMIT that china hacked and stole the US technologies. Take you long enough" Read carefully , since when did I say anything saying they didnt? I said there are US spies in China too. How did you know it was China that did it first? 'About the part “US does it all the time throughout history” is crap. What did the US steal from China again?' READ CAREFULLY . I referred specifically to Whites. Not countries. Governments can change. Race does not. The Whites, namely western Europeans, the ones that invaded pretty much the whole world, are the ones that committed the biggest crimes in human history. They were the ones that invaded, raped, murder and stole from more than half the world, 30x the landmass of their own homeland. 30 fucking times the size of their own countries combined! Tell me that the Whites didnt steal again. And they didnt even give it back.. "You also ADMIT that China backed NK, too. Took it long enough for you to have some dignity. Yeah right! They backed NK by selling them nuke materials and violate the agreement" Your choice of words make you sound extremely uneducated. Especially from someone frowning upon wikipedia. I did not "admit" to anything. Its got nothing to do with me. Again, READ CAREFULLY . Can you not comprehend English? I never said China didnt back NK. Also, no credible source that China sold nuke materials to NK is propaganda. You can go spread your propaganda somewhere else. "Man you bit your own tail by arguing China didnt sell nuke materials to NK but also admitting they did back NK. You are funny" Wheres your logic? You can have your brothers back, but that doesnt mean you have to give him nukes. "Logic! Use it!" The US backed many countries including dictators, does that mean the US sell them nukes too? Idiot. "China disturbs the Indian is true , and they pissed off India. “US does that all the time?” Really? Last time I checked, the US never disturbed Indian Seas" Is this how you graduated? Your comprehension skills are atrocious. For the last time, READ CAREFULLY . “US does that all the time" refers to the act that US disturbs countries and regions all the time. "Since when Taiwan is a part of China? Taiwan is never a part of China. You shamelessly claim Taiwan the same way China claimed it and the south seas" Since when was it not part of China? Taiwan was part of Qing China, then Japan, then back to China. Since Republic of CHINA was the ruling CHINESE state of CHINA then, ROCHINA had administration over Taiwan. ROC China is the successor of Qing China. So dont "shamelessly claim Taiwan" and "Taiwan is never a part of China" me. "The question is: what evidence did china have to claim those? Oh, none!! That’s right! That is why they lost in the international court- no evidence" Your response is uneducated as ever. Always needing me to correct you. China didnt have "no" evidence at court. They just didnt have substantial evidence at the time to satisfy the international tribunal. But heres something for you to look at since you believe there was none: https://www.quora.com/What-evidence-does-China-offer-to-substantiate-its-claims-of-sovereignty-in-the-South-China-Sea "Oh no! China didnt back vietnam. They back the communist Ho Chi Minh to use him as the puppet to beat the southern vietnam" Communist Vietnam is current Vietnam... "Need I remind you that China has been attacking Vietnam since ancient time?" Chinese kingdoms had been attacking Chinese kingdoms since ancient times. Viet and Vietnam (Southern Viet) was no exception. Infact ancient Vietnam was in and part of modern day southern China. They were part of the many kingdoms in the current day "Chinese" area. "Even now they still claim vietnamese islands. Oh do they have evidence? Zero!" Vietnam islands? Do the Vietnamese have evidence that the Paracel islands are theirs? You somehow acknowledge that with ZERO evidence that the Paracel islands belong to Vietnam? I thought you were all about evidence. Whos biting their own tail now hmm? "Since when Taibet is a part of China again? Oh when the communist party of china came in with guns. Yea, a part of China..." I think you need to learn some history before arguing over things you dont even know. Ive said it before and I'll say it again, Tibet (not Taibet) was part of Qing China for longer than USA was even a country. China only temporarily lost control of its outer borders due to foreign invasions from the Japs and the Whites I spoke of earlier. "So, again let me state some facts here again:" And again, let me state some facts here again: "China invaded Taibet and killed many in the process" Whites invaded the world and killed many in the process (why didnt you mention that?) "Back the NK regime and violated the sanction agreement" The US backed the SK regime when it was under brutal dictatorship. And still backs 70% of the worlds dictatorship. "Hacked, spied, and stole technologies from other countries" Invaded, raped, murder and stole land from other countries. "Invaded others’ territories( south seas, taibet, vietnam) China bullies Taiwan by threatening them with bombs" Invaded, raped, murder, stole and overthrew governments. "Top general of Zimbawe went to china a few days before starting a coup... i will leave that to you to draw conclusion whether China meddled with foreign affairs" USA supported assassination and coup of then president in South Vietnam 1963. And thats just one of the MANY countries the US meddled with. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB101/index.htm I've said it before and I'll say it again. Why just point fingers at 1 country. When the country youre defending is even worst when you count all the wars, invasions and countrys the US has meddled with all these years?
1
The Trumptrain Prove me wrong
1
The Trumptrain Thats right. You cant
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin Not only cant you read properly, you also like to assume things without any connections. Ive mentioned already, wikipedia is a reference, I never claimed it to be a credible source. Also, with how your brain functions as seen in your statement "I give a statement and let people do the search to clarify it so they will have their own answers", somehow you cant seem to link statements on wikipedia and "search to clarify it so you will have your own answers". Or does it for whatever reason apply to your statements only? "Your “sources” have been debunked" You dont even have any source. Even when explicitly asked to provide evidence to your propaganda. All opinions based on selective information. Your claims are void by default. "China has been invading territories since ancient times and you compared that to little things the whites did? America has only been a few hundred years and you compared that to the amount of bloodshed done by china over thousands of years?" Really? Just a few hundred years? Guess in your books Americans are the only Whites in this world. Are the Romans not considered White? Did European kingdoms never invade each others territories too? Pfft, just "a few hundred years". Who are you kidding? With that statement, you just provided evidence your brain isnt able to function logically and link ethnicities with one another. Since you like repeating yourself and copy pasting, allow me to respond in the same manner: All this coming from someone who cant comprehend English properly and needed me to explicit call you out to "read carefully"; cant even use his brain to think think logically (eg China backs NK, therefore it must supply it nukes); says the Paracel islands are Vietnamese out of nowhere without any sort of evidence; and cant even provide any credible source in his claims and uses the excuse of "I Iet people do the search to clarify it so they will have their own answers"; oh and now thinks Americans are the only Whites in this world. Your "facts" have been answered. The next fact I give you trumps all the "facts" you have given me. The Whites have committed the worst crime in human history by invading, raping, murdering, stealing and enslaving the all the countries theyve touched while reaping all the benefits like kings. Thats 30x the landmass of their own countries. Whats little Tibet compared to the invasion of the rest of the world? Its ridiculous if your brain cant even compare level of atrocities committed. The Japs are right behind them.
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin Yeh I had better things to do. Like going on a holiday you know? I'll respond to whoever I want whenever I want. "Come back and reread if u still dont understand. You are the one that attempted to convince me with your wikipedia crap and got debunked. Ur other sources are unverified as well." No. Its YOU that still doesnt understand. You cant "debunk" me with no sources to prove me wrong. At least I have sources. Wheres yours?! 50c logic right there. Pretending to be all educated and shit when you cant even provide all your evidences and rejects everything cited from wiki. Whats the difference from what you say and what wiki says? Mr "I give a statement and let people do the search to clarify it so they will have their own answers". Wiki does the exact same thing. Except they have references at the bottom. Unlike you. Why cant wiki "give a statement" and let you "research to clarify it so you will have your own answer?" "How can you expect me to read the source that EVEN YOU now admit “i never claimed it to be a credible source.” How many times do you have to keep biting your own ass over and over again? You make your mom proud with your 50 cent intelligence" It really does seem like you have issues with English. Just because someone never "claimed" it to be "something", doesnt mean its not "something". If you still don't comprehend basic English. Let me break it down for you. I never claimed to be human. Does that mean I'm not human? Idiot. "You make your mom proud with your 50 cent intelligence" You seem to have a mental disorder. Youre repeating yourself again, copy pasting the exact same thing. Allow me to respond in a manner that accommodates your disorder: All this coming from someone who cant comprehend English properly and needed me to explicit call you out to "read carefully"; cant even use his brain to think think logically (eg China backs NK, therefore it must supply it nukes); says the Paracel islands are Vietnamese out of nowhere without any sort of evidence; and cant even provide any credible source in his claims and uses the excuse of "I Iet people do the search to clarify it so they will have their own answers"; oh and now thinks Americans are the only Whites in this world. The Whites have committed the worst crime in human history by invading, raping, murdering, stealing and enslaving the all the countries theyve touched while reaping all the benefits like kings. Thats 30x the landmass of their own countries. Whats little Tibet compared to the invasion of the rest of the world? Its ridiculous if your brain cant even compare level of atrocities committed
1
And youre still trying to defend yourself that you can read... lol what a joke. To accommodate your metal disorder. Allow me to respond in the same way you do. To refresh your memories, this is what I said in response to your comments: You: "You also ADMIT that China backed NK" Me: READ CAREFULLY . I never said China didnt back NK. You: "So, finally You ADMIT that china hacked and stole the US technologies. Me: READ CAREFULLY , since when did I say anything saying they didnt? Also, admit is the wrong word to use. You cant "admit" something for someone else idiot. You can only admit/confess something related to yourself. Whats with your half ass English Mr must-supply-me-a-credible-source-but-I-dont-have-to? You: 'About the part “US does it all the time throughout history” is crap. What did the US steal from China again?' Me: READ CAREFULLY . I said 'When Whites steal its okay, when China does its not okay?' Not "US"
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin Oh man. Im not even sure how to even communicate with you anymore. You lack basic English comprehension. And you lack logic. This may very well be my last message to you. Listen. I said 'I never claimed to be human'. Not, 'I am not a human'. Theres a huge difference. 'I never claimed to be human' does not mean you are or arent a human being. It literally means I have never made a statement claiming to be human being. 'I am not human' means you claim you are not a human being. Similarly, I said 'I never claimed it to be a credible source', not 'it is not a credible source'. 'I never claimed it to be a credible source' does not mean it is or isnt a credible, it means I personally never claimed it to be a credible source. So dont go put words in my mouth and say I "admit" its not credible when I never made that claim. Also, with how your brain functions, never would I have thought that you have such a hard time accepting references from wikipedia when they do the exact same thing as you do: "give a statement and let people do the search to clarify it so they will have their own answers".
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin Its confirmed. You werent a very bright student in school. Time and time again youve given evidence through your words that you lack basic English comprehension skills and lack logic. Not only that but you refuse to provide credible source and claimed you have "debunked" something. Id rather not go in circles and keep explaining things to someone lacking those skills. Read carefully what Ive said again. You keep thinking "I never claimed it to be a credible source" translates to "its not a credible source". I also said "I never claimed to be human", does that translate to "Im not human"? With how your brain functions, Im honestly surprised you have such a hard time accepting references from wikipedia when they do the exact same thing as you do: "give a statement and let people do the search to clarify it so they will have their own answers". Since you think going "back on topic" means repeatedly copy pasting what you have written like 8x, let me go "back on topic" too: Coming from someone who cant comprehend English properly and needed me to explicit call you out to "read carefully" over and over; cant even use his brain to think think logically (eg China backs NK, therefore it must supply it nukes, and "I didnt claim to be human" somehow means "I am not human" to him); says the Paracel islands are Vietnamese out of nowhere without any sort of evidence; and cant even provide any credible source in his claims and uses the excuse of "I Iet people do the search to clarify it so they will have their own answers"; oh and now thinks Americans are the only Whites in this world. The Whites have committed the worst crime in human history by invading, raping, murdering, stealing and enslaving the all the countries theyve touched while reaping all the benefits like kings. Thats 30x the landmass of their own countries. Whats little Tibet compared to the invasion of the rest of the world? Its ridiculous if your brain cant even compare level of atrocities committed
1
Ryuseiken Kyokushin Im done with you. Once again, youve shown us all how terrible your English actually is. Cant believe youre pretending to be all "educated" and shit by laughing at wiki. This statement proves it all: "That question mark is not supposed to be outside of the quotation marks, btw" So you think its the below is correct? "Im not human?" (ending a question with a quotation mark?) "Im not human." (with a quotation mark ending the sentence?) "Im not human," ... I constructed a new sentence using my own quotations. Original quote: "I never claimed to be human. Does that mean I'm not human?" If I constructed the new sentence in your way, it would be: "I also said 'I never claimed to be human.', does that translate to 'Im not human?'"? You cant end a question with a quotation mark, even if youre quoting a something ending in a question mark. You can omit the initial "?" in favour of the new "?" to end the sentence. Just like how you know you can omit the first ".", you can omit the initial "?" too in favour of the newly constructed sentence. Understand?
1