Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "China's northernmost city records lowest temperature since 1969" video.

Mr RayPhotO The average temperature of the globe IS warming. There will be greater extremities around the world, including areas getting colder, and areas getting hotter. But nevertheless, the average temperature is for the globe is warming.
3
@BeachMongoose Temperatures goes up, and temperatures go down. Doesnt matter if there was an anomaly for 1 year. Its the overall trend, its the big picture. Try finding data from a 10 yr+ period. The overall temperature is going up. And as for your comment about polar bears, like I said, there are more extremities on both sides of the spectrum. Doesnt surprise me some places get colder. That doesnt affect the OVERALL landscape of things. The average temperature trend around the world IS increasing over the years. Also, correlation does not mean causation. could be that warmer ocean temperatures allow fish to survive better, thus more food for the bears. You never know. But remember, correlation does not mean causation. It can never be used as a basis when making any intellectual points.
1
@BeachMongoose "The Pause lasted for over 18 years bud" You might want to get the latest news on "the pause" youre speaking of. Latest data showed it didnt happen. Read BOTH sides of story, not just cherry pick one side of the story. "97% of all scientists agree that man is behind global warming" This sentence right here shows that you cant interpret information properly. Youre literally misconstruing the words of whats actually said. Its not 97% of ALL scientists, its 97% of scientists that came to a conclusion agree that it is. MOST scientists DID NOT make any conclusions, they were inconclusive. And what we were talking about was not whether "man is behind global warming" or not, but whether global warming is real or not. Global warming and global cooling are a natural phenomenon of this planet. Ice ages are proof to that. They come and go. Its a cycle of ups and downs over a long period of time.
1
@BeachMongoose "as in, all scientists that produce results that support the global warming hype. Finish the point I was making, don't get it twisted with inconclusions" Inconclusions ARE part of the results. It means they concluded that there is not enough information to give a definitive answer. "Of course, The Pause didn't happen now. It doesn't fit the political narrative, huh? Nothing to see here. I'm sure it's been scrubbed just as well. Unbelievable..." Facts dont care about opinions. Science is not "political". Nor does it have any "narrative". Its all about data. And its only a matter of time when we have more data that we can get a clearer picture to formulate a more precise conclusion. 18 years on a grand scale of things is nothing when we are observing a period for hundreds of years. And even in those 18 years if you bothered looking into the data, it was a slow down, not a "pause". It wasnt averaging 0°C degree growth, it was averaging over a 0.2°C degree growth. Growth is still a growth. And although that doesnt sound like much, 1.5°C is the danger zone. Those 18 years of "pause" you speak of encroached over 10% of the danger zone scientists say. You still call that a "pause"? This aint about no "political narrative". Its hard science. "I mentioned man-made because it's part of the agenda. Politicize a natural occurring event, climate that changes everyday" You ONLY mentioned "man-made" in your recent comments. Your earlier comments only spoke about global warming in general. And there is sufficient evidence that greenhouse gases does in fact increase temperature in the atmosphere. It might not be the "cause" of global warming, but it is indeed a factor that accelerates this global warming process. So not sure why youre so against the science of this.
1