Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "China Has Detained More Than a Million Muslims | Op-Ed | NowThis" video.

@UmerRizwan1 Uyghurs are not native to Xinjiang. They migrated there.
6
@Harrysuke Xinjiang was part of China longer than USA was even a country. China only temporarily lost control over its borders due to foreign invasion. If youre going to talk about invasion, what do you have to say about US, Canada, Australia and other new world countries?
5
@KarimElhoussami Uyghers arent "native" to Xinjiang.
2
@Capitan Barbosa Uyghurs arent native to Xinjiang. But Tibetans are native to Tibet. Moreover, Tibet and Xinjiang has been part of China for longer than USA was even a country. China only temporarily lost control over its borders due to foreign invasion.
2
@emreyesil1802 Uyghurs arent native to Xinjiang. And Xinjiang has been part of China longer than USA was even a country. China only temporarily lost control over its borders due to foreign invasion.
2
@Harrysuke "manchu invaded uyghur khaganate in 1876. manchu annex it from east turkistan and renamed it as xinjiang" Uyghur Khaganate? You mean the same Uyghur Khaganate that havent existed for over 1000 years? Or did you mean the Dzungar Khanate? Also, Qing conquered the Dzungar Khanate (Tarim basin) in 1759.
1
@Capitan Barbosa Native mean native. Conquered is conquered. Uyghurs are both not the natives, and have been conquered. Its simple as that. Now, the land of Xinjiang has been part of China for longer than USA was even a country. If you are against this, then you better also be against the new world countries conquering North America, Australia, etc.
1