Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Who is Carrie Lam, the Leader of Hong Kong? | NYT News" video.

2:51 Wrong. Political fugitives are exempt from the bill. Moreover, it has to be a crime in HK of at least 7 years imprisonment for any extradition request is progressed. So brainwashed this people...
12
Charles Foley Just like Trump yeh? She was elected by LOCAL representatives of HK, just like Trump was elected by the representatives of the US (electoral college).
6
Guess every CEO in this world is also a "puppet"
4
@mng3941 No matter how cunning China can be, if its not a crime IN HK, like freedom of speech, or freedom of religion, then a fugitive cannot be extradited at all. It MUST be a crime of at least 7 years imprisonment IN HK for an extradition request to progress. And HK independent judiciary has the final say on whether or not the fugitive gets extradited. There nothing wrong with being paranoid. But to hold the city to a standstill, blocking roads, affecting businesses, economy, assaulting police, all theses affecting innocent people, then you are just destroying your city. And pointing lasers at peoples eyes is a criminal offence. A split second can cause permanent damage to ones retina. Police should arrest every single criminal shiny laser onto peoples eyes.
4
@adrianatgaming8640 So youre pretty much saying everyone must follow the US ways of doing things otherwise its nonsense? Every government has their own ways of doing things. Just because it doesnt suit what another country does doesnt make it illegitimate. Also, HKs elections representatives are selected via an election. Stop spreading fake new. CCP only gave them the "OK" once theyre elected to get them officially in the door. Whos the one spreading disinformation now? And just FYI, US electoral representatives arent elected by the masses. Not sure why you wanted to bring that point up.
1
@VonWipfenfels "I see that you too are twisting words china-style" I dont know what you mean by "China-style". Im merely pointing out the facts. If that is considered "China-style" then I have nothing else to say to you. If anyone here is twisting words its you with your ""Hong Kong is being lied to and, no matter what system is being used, lies are lies". Tell me, which specific law was broken? If you cannot answer that question then you yourself are also spreading disinformation.
1
@VonWipfenfels What lies? Heres another lie from you: "while the only candidates allowed are handpicked by Beijing". Beijing doesnt "handpick" candidates, they filter candidates, and then HK pick themselves. Looks like YOU are the one twisting words "China-style". 'Or the fact that new laws are dictated by China, despite having "an independent system"?' And wow more lies from you. What evidence do you have for that claim hmmm?
1
@VonWipfenfels You lose an argument so you can only resort to accusing someone as part of a propaganda machine? Or are you really that dumb you cant tell the difference? Beijing handpicking is BJ personally picking candidate A, B, C, D, E for HK to vote for. Which is not the case. The case is HK picking candidates A, B, C, D, E and BJ filters the HK handpicked candidates to A, B, D, E for HK to elect. Huge difference. Also, just because you say someone is "lieing" (especially without providing evidence nor logical reasoning) doesnt mean they are. It means that either you are lieing yourself, or you are just outright dumb.
1
@VonWipfenfels Again, what law has China broken again? Cant specify it right? Because they didnt break any.
1