Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "China has border disputes with 17 countries" video.

Flying Berserker They unofficially claim Mongolia because Mongolia was part of Qing Dynasty before every foreign invasion of China in the past century. Got nothing to do with Gengis Khan, where did you even hear that fake news from?
17
CaspianReport 8:14 Fake news. The latest official figures from the Taiwanese government is 27% wanting independence. Thats not "most Taiwanese".
5
@davidguerreiro2579 Oh? Whats this? Trying to get personal here are we? Why does that matter to you?
5
Ravi Gupta TIbet has been part of China longer than USA has been a country. Google Qing Dynasty map. And tell me which year Tibet was incorporated as part of Qing.
4
CaspianReport 6:47 Wrong. It was Vietnam and Philippines that militarised islands in the region first. Just that China started late and building proportionally to its GDP. Also, your wordings are again, biased. "from the Philippines, China claim...from Vietnam, Beijing claims..." Youre again making assumption that it is already a certain countrys territory by default. If you dont think thats bias, then does flipping it around "from China, Philippine claims...from China, Vietnam claims..." sound bias to you? China was the FIRST country in the region to make sovereign claims to the islands in the late 1940s and was undisputed. It was not until oil was found over 2 decades LATER that Vietnam and PH started claiming and militarised those islands.
3
Fusion "I lived in China for a few years... they're about to steal everything from you" So living in a few years in another country means whatever you say must be true? Surely your words must be credible. Especially when you say steal "EVERYTHING"...Im not sure about you but everything means 100% of everything...
3
@utkarshg.bharti9714 "Yeah, that's why they elected a president that wants Taiwan to have a separate country, isn't it?" Oh really? Quote me where Tsai said she wants Taiwan to be a separate "country". Independent and "separate country" are 2 very different things. "I know English is difficult for you to understand, but try". "Democratic countries don't work that way, mate. It's difficult for you to understand, but try" Work what way? I never said anything about anything working in a particular way. Are you reading English properly here? I merely provided the official statistics. "I know its difficult for you, but try"
3
The Alchemist "That's funny because the Qing dynasty was founded by Manchurians who aren't Han Chinese" Who on earth said China had to be ruled by Han for it to be called "Chinese"? Theres so many ethnic groups in China. China could be ruled by anyone one of them and still be called "Chinese". Just like India. Dont have double standards. "The Manchurians supported Japanese invasion of China if you didn't know" Lol. The Manchurian supported Japan invading their own country? Right. You must be an expert at this topic for you to arrive that that conclusion.
3
CaspianReport 4:27 China doesnt claim the Ryuku islands what are you talking about? And did you just assume the "DISPUTED" territory as another countrys? Its called DISPUTED for a reason. Why did you assume its not Chinas no matter what? What authority do you have to make that assertion? Stick to objective statements. Dont be bias in your reporting
3
Jolanda Jong You do realise that Republic of China claims more land and sea territory than PRC right?
3
@jolandajong4068 "Not anymore, because Taiwan doesn't see itself as part of China anymore" Then why does their constitution not reflect that? What youre saying is just wishful thinking. The moment PRC collapses I assure the first think that will happen is ROC will be sending in their troops to control the mainland.
3
@jolandajong4068 "and i do have the answer; FEAR....before changing the constitution and provoke Beijng's wrath" It only invokes Beijings wrath if they claim to be independent from China. It wont invoke their wrath to revoke their territorial claims over mainland China. Theres a difference. As long as they claim to remain to be part of China, its all fine to revoke their claims over the mainland. But they havent. "the ministry of foreign affairs always describe the strait disputes as ''internal Chinese affairs''. In reality it's not internal, Taiwan is a independent country and independent from mainland China" From this statement its clear you dont know the history of China (ROC and PRC). "Taiwan" has never been a "country", ever. Its also not "independent". Its dependent on Republic of CHINA. Taiwan is a PART of ROC. ROC and Taiwan is not synonymous, saying it is is for the ignorant. Its "internal affairs" because its internal affairs of the SAME COUNTRY. Its called a civil war for a reason. Civil war means war within the SAME COUNTRY. ROC once sat in the UN as the country called CHINA.
3
Jonas Kircher "On the same notions that the Chinese government claims the Ryukyuan islands, Vladivostok, Mongolia and the South Chinese sea" China doesnt claim the Ryuku islands. Thats fake news. As for the Chinese government claiming Vladivostok, thats also fake news. When did he Chinese GOVERNMENT make that claim? Same for Mongolia, wtf where you getting these fake news from?
3
CaspianReport 9:39 What on earth? Based on "shared heritage"? What does that even mean? They claim it because the sovereignty of Mongolia was officially handed over from Qing China to Republic of China. They lost control over Mongolia mainly due to Russia.
3
@wesscat Are you incapable of simple google searches? If I dont provide you with a source does that mean its false? Youre a grown adult, if you want to know something, search it up yourself. If you asked politely, maybe I wouldve given you a pointer. But no, you just HAD to demand in such a manner.
2
@CaspianReport Fake news. China doesnt claim ALL of Arunachal Pradesh. Only 1/3 of what you have shaded.
2
@leto.o5759 "Tibeten people aren't han Chinese people though. Also Tibet was independent and was invaded" So what if theyre not Han Chinese? You think everyone in India/USA/Russia/etc is of the same race? "Also Tibet was independent and was invaded" Same for every Indian Empire in history. What are you trying to say? That India should be broken into many independent countries now just because they were independent in the past?
2
@oscar0649 I actually do lol
2
@jolandajong4068 "Again they will revoke the One-China principal, after Taiwan have secured guarantees to it's security." Opinions. You think KMT will allow that? Just because the ruling party wants something doesnt meant theyll get it. They need a majority vote in government revoke such a claim. Also, civil war has not officially ended yet. Theres not such thing as "guaranteed security" in any war. When the war ends, its either ROC rules all of China (inc Taiwan) or PRC rules all of China (inc Taiwan). "But the administration believes it's independent from China and the people increasingly believe they are a separate identity and country than mainland China" Wrong. The administration is independent from PRC, not "China". ROC also claims to be the country called "China". And "believe" is a an extremely subjective word there. Facts are facts. Doesnt matter what people "believe". "The momentum for it is approaching" That opinion of yours is not backed by anything...lets speak facts here...
2
@SameerHameedy "Taiwan doesn't claim china anymore" Then why are they flying a Chinese flag? Why is the name of their state Republic of CHINA? Why have they not revoked their claim over the Chinese mainland in their constitution? Clearly they still do. Theyre just keeping it low key thats all.
2
CaspianReport 4:26 You claimed them to be Japanese islands. Who are you to determine disputed areas as whose? Also, China does not claim the chain of Ryuku islands you highlighted. More FAKE NEWS.
2
@peterwarner553 Whats a "lie"? That Vietnam and Philippines militarised those islands first? Or that China first made the claims in the 1940s? Seems like you cant enter into a conversation without stating things clearly.
1
@fusion9619 And Im sure your words are credible for just living there a few years
1
@ieronymos9265 'Who said that the Middle Kingdom was “China”?' What are you trying to say here?
1
The Alchemist "The Manchurians if given a choice would declare independence" More BS opinions backed by nothing. Do you have evidence to that claim? "Why would they live as a minority in China and having to learn Mandarin when the Han Chinese aren't learning Manchurian" Tell that to the Manchurian Emperors. Why would they be ruling a country theyre a minority in, and use Mandarin as the official language?
1
@Permuh "so what you're saying is that with lots of ethnic groups, China could rather be divided into smaller nations instead of the old imperialistic model?" When did I say anything about "divided"? I said there are many ethnic groups in China, and any of them can govern China and still be called "Chinese". "Chinese" is a not a race mind you. All citizens of China are "Chinese".
1
@leto.o5759 "The thing is Tibeten people never wanted to be a part of China. Indian people wanted to be a part of india" Tell that to the natives of North America and Australia. You think the natives there wanted to be part of USA/CA/AUS/NZ? So what are you trying to say now? Divided this planet up on what people want? Im sorry but thats not how the world works...
1
@ManabDasiammanab "Neither Tibetians not the people of Xianjang has anything to do with Han Chinese. Hans will be pushed back to where they belong" Dravidians have nothing to do with Indo-Aryans. Push the Indo-Aryans back where they belong. Sound fair enough to you?
1
@leto.o5759 "Those natives are dead omg" What do you mean "those a natives are dead"? Theres natives still living on those lands right now. What are you talking about? "People keep saying the same thing over and over" What did I say "over and over"? But even if I did, so what? Facts cant be said over and over? Who said? You fear facts or something? If you dont get the point then it will be said again...
1
@ManabDasiammanab "But Dravidians share similar culture and religion with the Indo-Aryans Ever heard of assimilation? Just because Dravidian TODAY have assimilated similar culture, doesnt mean it ALWAYS had. Indo-Aryans invaded and push Dravidian further down south. You think they liked that? You brought up ethnicity, so I used an example to counter your argument. Now that your argument backfired, you want to bring up a new point about religion and culture? Let me tell you something, just because group of people share same religion and have similar culture, it doesnt mean theyre cant be part of the same country, nor does it mean they have to be part of the same country. Otherwise, Korea and Vietnam would be part of China; and all the Muslims countries would also be 1 country. "and they don't wanna sperate themselve unlike the Tibetians and the people of Xianjang who doesn't wanna live with the Hans" I dont think you understand what sovereignty is. Once conquered, the land is theirs whether they like it or not. That is why Whites are ruling lands outside of Europe. And theres NOTHING you nor I can do about it.
1
@jacobhuskinson3854 "50 cent army drone" Says the one copy pasting the same message everywhere. Clearly YOURE the bot here.
1
Yeh thats exactly what I said lol
1
@andrew1717xx You have point if the GOVERNMENT made an unofficial claim. But the government never did that.
1
@TheReaper569 "much free er under british rule than you can ever be under Chinese rule" Under British rule, HK could not vote at all. Must be a White British Governor governing HK. Under Chinese rule, HK could at least have a HKer govern HK.
1
@TheReaper569 "so that's why hong kong people are at the streets protesting not to unite with China... Are you getting your info from Chinese national television?" Unite with China? Thats not the reason for why theyre protesting...where you getting your fake news from?
1
@TheReaper569 "hk er that was appointed by china. Lol. Not voting is better than a false voting" Lam and all the other Chief Executives of HK were ALL voted in by local HKers. After they vote their powers to govern HK was GIVEN to them by PRC. Thats called a process of "appointment". They were not "chosen" by PRC. The choice was HKs.
1