Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "China’s navy is tipping the balance" video.

Miroslav Houdek "As soon as they got the chance, they are like, hey Tibet, we are taking your country" Tibet has been part of China for longer than USA has been a country. They only temporarily lost control over its borders due to foreign invasions and civil conflict. And legally speaking, Tibet had always been part of China for the past 300+ years.
31
@ameyzagade94 Why dont you do it yourself?
14
@jordanknight336 "completely irrelevant. The fact that China held Tibet, a land with it's own culture, it's own language, it's own ethnicity, and NO desire to be ruled by the Chinese" Ah yess. Just like how Whites that held AUS/US/CA/NZ, a land of its own culture, its own language, its own ethnicity, and NO desire to be ruled by Whites. My point is if Whites can rule AUS/US/CA/NZ, why cant Chinese do the same? China conquered Tibet long before USA/CA/AUS/NZ were even countries.
11
@miroslavhoudek7085 "what's next? Oh I know - Vietnam used to be historically under Chinese occupation at one point in time too" Tibet and Xinjiang have both been legally part of China for longer than USA has been a country. Vietnam wasnt legally part of China, they havent been for a long time.
9
@miroslavhoudek7085 "there's no legal and illegal colonization. Those who have power take advantage of the weak and pray on them. The "humiliation" of China was perfectly legal too, so was slavery and so were concentration camps. None of this makes China's aggression in Tibet okay in any way" Your words seem rather contradictory... Let me ask you this, do you oppose colonisation of AUS/NZ/USA/CA in the same way China did to Tibet?
3
@jordanknight336 "No one was talking about the US or British Empire. They have done bad things too. We are talking about China, stop trying to change the subject with whataboutisms" Its not "changing the subject". Its exposing your double standards. Why have different standards for China when they did exactly the same as what the West did? Do you condemn the US/AUS/CA/NZ in the same way you condemn China? Also, my comment was 100% relevant as it was responding DIRECTLY to the fact that the OP called Tibet a "country" when in fact it hasnt been for over 300 years. Tibet has been legally part of China for longer than USA has been a country. My point was, "if Whites can rule AUS/US/CA/NZ, why cant Chinese do the same?"
2
@miroslavhoudek7085 "it's not contradictory, or it only seems contradictory to someone like you who thinks that there is some legal and illegal occupation" There is such thing is legal and illegal occupation. After WW2, international law was set. Since then, there has been clear whats legal and illegal.
1
@nomesobrenome336 '"If nazis can genocide jews with the pretext of "liberate the aryan race", why can't the chinese imprison in millions the muslims in Xinjiang with the pretext of "liberate the extremists"?"' Except that the Chinese arent "imprisoning" "millions" of Muslims? Thats fake news. Theres no evidence for that. All you see are satellite imagery of new buildings being built (happens in every country), and words of anti-China actors. Words arent "evidence" mind you.
1