Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "How the Chinese Communist Party’s Tiananmen massacre crushed democracy in China | Four Corners" video.

@Groaker And I see the CIA dogs out in full force.
3
安西节度使 There wasnt. But under US definition, over 4 people dieing is called a "massacre". There were some deaths. On both student and military side. All Western propaganda to force China to be "democratic".
2
@Groaker A "few" is subjective. It is indeed a few compared to the tens of thousands reported. I can also work with recounts from first hand witnesses, provided its consistent with other first hand witnesses. But the numbers not the point here. The point is that the truth has clearly been hidden by both the East and the West. China just literally shut up and didnt say a thing, and dont want you to know a thing. The West however was there, with cameras recording evidence and everything, yet lied and still make it to seem like the CCP killed tens of thousands. Yes, a number of people died. But did they tell you that it was rioters that started killing unarmed soldiers first? Yes, there is hard evidence. Did they tell you that rioters were surrounding tanks, destroying them (mind you these were 3rd world tanks - easily damaged) lighting them on fire, and murdering the soldiers inside? When the soldiers were surrounded and attacked, trying to protect themselves from being killed what do you think will happen? A few bodies run over obviously. But what did the west report? "PLA runs over students in tanks". Clearly propaganda. And yes, there were hard evidence recorded as well. It was not until soldiers were getting murdered, and things got out of hand that the PLA was ordered to control all the destruction, using force if necessary. Thats when guns were used. Those rioters were not innocent as the media portrayed them to be. Most of them were. So we thought. But shit got down real quick when they started murdering soldiers etc . The truth is out there. Just keep watching different videos. But dont listen to the anchor, theyre just spouting propaganda.
2
Absolutely no evidence of a Massacre at all. Unless you're talking about the legal definition of a massacre, meaning over 4 people died...
2
@Groaker "I love how you just assume I'm Christian because I'm western. So dumb" Then you must also love how you assumed we were CCP drones for being Pro-China. So dumb.
1
@Groaker You said droneS with an S. And I was the only other person comment on this thread at that time. So I really wonder how you assumed I was a "CCP drone" in the first place. Or how anyone that is Pro-China a "CCP Commie" by default. Also, it wasnt a "Pro-Commie" stance. It was an unbiased logical question. And being Pro-China doesnt mean youre a "commie".
1
@Groaker If youre gonna accuse me of something Im not them Im gonna have to lay it out. He literally asked where is the evidence. An objective question.
1
@Groaker Like you said, if hes from China, then he knows nothing about it. After listening to all these "news" on some massacre hes never heard of, it only makes sense for him to genuinely ask for evidence of massacre instead of blindly listening. Not a rhetorical question at all.
1
@Groaker Sure, and how do you know hes not one of those Chinese that were JUST exposed to the "news". News is in quotation because its news to them, and not to us. All this bs about rhetoric and sarcasm is all in your head.
1
@Groaker Quotation marks can be used to express irony, which is the case here. And I dont have the inability to infer meaning from context. I work with facts. And from the OPs message, there is not enough information to deduce he that he is a communist. Without enough information, you should give them the benefit of the doubt and regard his question as genuine. Because the fact of the matter is, there actually isnt evidence of a "massacre" of over 10,000 people as the media portrays it to be. Only evidence of a few deaths here and there. And a lot of them where soldiers.
1
@Groaker Bruh, I said "news is in quotation because its news to them, and not to us". Thats pretty much the definition of irony: "a literary technique, originally used in Greek tragedy, by which the full significance of a character's words or actions is clear to the audience or reader although unknown to the character". "You're a denialist of the worst kind" I dont know the truth. And neither do you. We can only work with the evidence we have at hand. And there is absolutely no evidence that tens of thousands of people died from this event. All propaganda. 'Even when official response from the actual Chinese government at the time put the death toll at a couple of hundred more than just "a few,"' You honestly seem to have issues comprehending peoples words. I said "Only EVIDENCE of a few deaths here and there". No where did I state how many people died. So dont put words in my mouth. 'Either way, these "facts" you supposedly work from are anything but' Facts are hard evidence. I only work with hard evidence. Theres absolutely no hard evidence that tens of thousands died. Let alone thousands.
1