Comments by "mpetersen6" (@mpetersen6) on "Whatifalthist" channel.

  1. 125
  2. 82
  3. 74
  4. 61
  5. 27
  6. 21
  7. 14
  8. 13
  9. 11
  10. 10
  11. 9
  12. 9
  13. 8
  14. 7
  15. 7
  16. 6
  17. 6
  18. 6
  19.  @wolfpack4128  Where I live we used to have a large number of industrial facilities. All of them with unions. All of them are gone now. Out of business, moved South, consolidated in other locations etc. But the community has moved on to a large degree. Granted there are still those who long for the old days. It's understandable. You could buy a home, raise a family etc. But as you stated. They never understood economics or market forces. There is another factor in the decline of manufacturing in the Rust Belt that often gets overlooked though. A lot of industrial facilities dated from the 1920s or earlier. They were often inefficient to run and did not lend themselves to modernization. Also when they were built there location was often at the edges of the community they were built in. Eventually the the communities grew around them. Their primary mode of transport for materials coming in and goods going out was rail. As railroads began to shut down branch lines that were losing money these companies had to begin relying on trucks. With their location inside of cities often surrounded by residential neighborhoods this was not an ideal solution. I retired out of an automotive facility in 2005. We built engines. There were plans being looked at to expand and begin building transmissions. It closed two or three years later. One reason was the downturn in the economy. The second is the company (Chrysler) simply built too many different engines. At one time we built two different V-6s along with the 4.0 liter inline 6 and 2.5 liter four used in Jeeps. Model redesign and government regulations killed off the 4.0 and 2.5. The V-6s were dropped in favor of the newer Pentastar. The third reason was the plant was basically in the center of the city. Truck access in and out to the Interstate was more of a pain. Also a major portion of the facility went back to the 20s. Newer facilities with more efficient operationing conditions built in and being closer to vehicle assembly plants won out. Other companies in other industries often suffered the same problems. A wire rope company merged with another company. The other company had more modern facilities. That labor rates aside simply took less manpower to run. Another is a company that produces high quality hand tools. They decided to move all of their manufacturing to facilities they already owned and just keep the corporate HQ. All of these companies and others were unionized. In some cases it was the union that was the last straw. In some cases it was simply economics.
    5
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 3
  27.  @davidkelly4210  I think it depends a lot on just how we define a "civilization". Was the culture that erected, carved and buried Golbecki Tepe a civilization? I'd say so. It may or may not of had agriculture as we define it. But they certainly had some sort of social cohesion. The National Geographic Society commissioned Robert Ballard and his group to do a survey of the wrecks of Allied warships lost around the Dardanelles during the Galipoli campaign in WWI. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://licensing.screenocean.com/record/215989&ved=2ahUKEwjOoJWn86PwAhXbQc0KHRSPCUUQFjAnegQIKxAC&usg=AOvVaw1OSX9LOKOL4kGud0JDVlcE Finding the wrecks was no problem. It was known pretty much where the were. In addition his team also found a number of circular stone structures with a taller stone structure in their center. One immediate conclusion was that they were religious structures of some sort. That seems, at least to a layman like me, to be one of the go to conclusions about ancient discoveries. To me they might have had a different purpose. Could they have been some form of communal dwelling for an extended family. They were up to about 30 meters in diameter and the central pillar could well have been used to support roof beams that extended from the outer circle to the center. Doing any extended od more thorough investigation would require an underwater survey but the whole problem is that the wrecks in the area are war graves which complicates the situation. The kicker here is the area was last above sea level at least 8,000 years ago. I suspect that there are a lot of archeological sites in areas that were dry land during the last glacial maximum. I'm not saying lost cities* I'm simply saying archeological sites. In terms of the earliest civilizations. As I said above it depends on just how we define it. I'd say if you have a common culture, social organization and way of making your living a society is most of the way there. *there may be some urban sites off of India's western coast southwest of Mumbai. If so just when did they go under the waves. Plus how long was the time frame from the first dwellings made of organic materials to the first mud brick structures to working with stone. There is a lot we do not know yet.
    3
  28. 3
  29. 2
  30. The way some portions of Western and especially the US societies mistreat Christianity is really bothersome to anyone who really takes the teaching in the Gospels seriously. Far too often in my opinion "christians" in the west will cherry pick certain parts of the bible to support their contradictory views or beliefs. The biblical justification for slavery is but one example. Another is the treatment of certain version of the bible being treated as though they were handed down from the literal throne. I'm looking at the KJV version here. Yet by and large talking about about some of these things is taboo in American (1) society. Yes atheism (2) will criticize religion in general. But to me it seems not get to specific in terms actual points. Then we have the whole arena of Wokism. Wokism in my opinion and others is the newest religion on the block. It certainly has some of the trappings of religion. Certain core values and beliefs that are not open for debate. And if you do dare to disagree you can face being shunned or banished. Also known as cancelled. But by far the worst thing in Western societies today is there far too little civil discourse (3). The public conversation is dominated by the fringes with the majority in the center feeling their voice can not be heard simply because any rational debate is not allowed. And both sides are quilty. 1) Yes their are other countries in the Americas. And their citizens could lay claim to being called Americans. Tough luck. The US got there first. Live with it. After all it's not the most important thing in anyone's universe. 2) Can atheism be considered a "religion"? I think so. Any philosophy with a core number of beliefs can be as far as I'm concerned. 3) In some ways the media us to blame for this. As long as there has been media be it the town crier to todays broadcast and internet there has been bias in the media. In the era of print media some newspapers were literal organs of political parties. To the point the papers were literally called blank Democrat or Republican. But there were papers with a more centrist leaning. With today's media I see nothing in the center. And very little anything moderate from both sides. No wonder we hear discussion about a possible civil war.
    2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50.  DarkEternal6  Workers that belong to industrial or construction unions has been on the decline ever since the 60s. Even without moving production off shore the move by industry to states that actively discourage unions would have only continued. Every company that is unionized in the US that has problems its is always the union the gets the brunt of the blame. Yes they share in the blame but most of the blame should be laid at the feet of the management of these companies. In the end quality of the product is not only a function of the factory floor and workforce. It is also a function of management making decisions about just what the level of quality is needed. This can be as simple as the allowable tolerances in a product to the overall build quality that management sets. In the 1980s the build quality of US automobiles was terrible compared to the Japanese when looking at the fits of body panels etc. What most people do not understand is almost all cars left the factory with the fit of the various body parts (doors, hoods, trunks etc) inrelationship to the body as whole in tolerance. The Japanese simply set a tighter tolerance. As to the quality of interior pieces a lot of that can be placed on the cost cutting attitude that if the part is really good when it costs a dollar and crappy at 98 cents we will use the 98 cent part. In the 1980s Ford contracted AMC to manufacture final drive gears for certain vehicles. The finished Ford parts made to Ford specifications howled like a banshee. The ones AMC made for themselves ran at least 10 decibels or more quieter. Remember the decibel scale is a log scale. Every ten points is a factor of ten. Its these types of decisions made by management that greatly effect quality. And in terms of industrial workers represented by unions Japan and Germany far outstrip the US. The vast majority of union membership in the US is in the public sector today.
    1
  51. 1
  52. As much as l dread a nuclear war even a limited one the thing that really scares me is the use of EMPs. Just how hardened is our power grid. Our communications systems. Very few cities in the United States would have running water much less functioning potable water. And then there is the waste treatment plants. All of which require electricity to power the pumps needed. Plus the electronics that control everything would likely be fried. And then there is the transportation networks. How many cars, trucks or trains would be functional. The lucky ones would be the dead. Even without EMPs consider a "limited" nuclear war between the US and Russia. Seattle and Charleston are toast. Sub bases for boomers. How many other military bases are close to fair sized military bases. How many vital Air Force Reserve units are based at major or secondary airports. Even non combat units such as transport or refueling units are targets. Honolulu is screwed with Pearl and Hickham right next door. San Diego. The Chesapeake Bay region. That's just what i can think of for the US of the top of my head. And now for the bad news. How many nations could or will have nuclear weapons in the next ten or twenty years? IMO Iran will. Anyone who thinks they won't is delusional. The coulds. Japan. If push comes to shove they could probably have functional weapons in a year from the time they make the decision. Tiawan. They have the industrial base. They have the capability. Just making the decision could force China's hand though. Brazil. Again the industrial base. The desire. That's another matter. The EU. Even though France has nucs would the EU pursue them. They certainly have the technology base. A lot depends on if the EU holds together. Saudi Arabia. If (when imo) Iran has an arsenal its on the table. Indonesia. That I'm not sure. I'm sure there are others. The point is even in the face of sanctions and agreements North Korea got the bomb.
    1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1