Comments by "mpetersen6" (@mpetersen6) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. Instead of mining the Belt maybe it would be more beneficial financially to not only surface mine the Moon but if we determine that the mass concentrations present in the Moon are the remnants of large bodies that buried themselves in the Moon's interior and are not too deep it might be possible to do resource extraction there. Just how deep could we mine on the moon using automated equipment. I think eve tually when people do live there in large numbers the ideal living spaces will excavated under the surface*. A lot of the materials could be used in expanding CIS space infrastructure while those destined for use on Earth could be delivered via a mass driver. And yes I understand that the Mass Driver is technically a weapon system. But then there is no such thing as an unarmed space ship. * are non CIS spaces treated prejudicial 🙄🙄 ** Future human habitation of the Moon depends on several things. 1) Reduced launch costs. 2) There has to the economic and social need to do so. 3) If long term living in a 1/6th G environment is not overly adverse to overall human health. We really have no data on just what low gee means. We have two data points. 1g and Zero g. Is the plot on a graph a straight line? A curve that rises rapidly and levels off? Or a curve that rises slowly and then shoot up close to one g. The only way to find the answers is to do the actual research with rotating labs that allow for research at 1/3rd and 1/6th g. We actually could have done this already using Shuttle hardware.
    2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1