Comments by "Olga P." (@olgap.) on "Ukraine's plan for victory" video.

  1. Not his first U-turn.
    2
  2. Did he?
    1
  3. Did he?
    1
  4. I agree that he is a propagandist, and in some regards he went down the wrong road. But let's be fair, he always said that Ukraine CAN win IF its allies' support remains high. That was a big if. It is not Commander Nielsen's fault that the help Ukraine receives is barely sufficient at best and declining. For the sake of objectivity, though, it would not harm to leave the realm of hypothetical and give an overview of the actual situation on the ground and an estimation of potential with the current level of support.
    1
  5. The West did not ignore any security guarantees. There were purposely none according to the Budapest Memorandum.
    1
  6. What commitment did the US not honour? Did it invade or nuke Ukraine? Or did it use economic coercion designed to secure advantages of any kind?
    1
  7.  @kadovax6567  That is correct. Original poster mentioned the USA, so did I.
    1
  8. If Plan for Victory is not about reclaiming Ukraine's 1991 territorial integrity anymore, when did definition of victory change and to what actually? ​ @anderspuck 
    1
  9.  @ricardozetino6907  Thank you. I understood your point and agreed with it. The question was addressed to the author of the video.
    1