Comments by "Olga P." (@olgap.) on "Nord Stream sabotage and hybrid war on Europe" video.

  1. What's the point if the message is supposed to be "we can do it again"? One needs access to the pipeline to pool this off. Not very impressive, if works on own pipelines only.
    2
  2. What exactly would Russia gain from that?
    2
  3. Oh, wait, it all started on 8th of June when Russians blew up Freeport LNG pipeline in Texas, Quintana.
    2
  4. You are the expert and I trust your judgment on maritime surveillance. What I struggle to believe is that Russia can control the outcome of the investigations and information policy about it. Or is it possible to pull off such a stunt with no evidence left behind?
    2
  5. In your other videos you do not hesitate to tell your very far away from flattering opinion about Russia's capabilities. What makes you think they are able to do this in one of the most observed areas of the Baltic Sea?
    1
  6. What's the point if the message is supposed to be "we can do it again"? One needs access to the pipeline to pool this off. Not very impressive, if it works on own pipelines only.
    1
  7. If my recollection is correct, all four pipes were pressurized. What led to loss of pressure and movement of the methane hydrate solids in three of them?
    1
  8. 09:50 I don't want to interpret too much into it, but it gives me really bad gut feeling to hear you name the USA and Poland among war parties. What happened to old good proxy war?
    1
  9. One can call this video a manipulative summary of facts and conclusions, the German part is exaggerated, but I did not detect any lies. Indeed, there is a lot not mentioned, and what is not mentioned speaks for itself. On the other hand, this is such a complex topic, there is enough material for a video on why Russia is not behind this or a video on why USA dit it. Video on why USA did not do it would be a very short one, though.
    1
  10. ​ @anderspuck  That's true, there is a lot of room for various interpretations. Nevertheless, in order to make your hypothesis work, the culprit better should be able to control investigation and information flow. Otherwise the sabotage is an invitation to escalate with "timing is absolutely up to you" remark. Also how to place such an operation precisely between detection and attribution thresholds with no influence on the post explosion development?
    1
  11.  @przemekkiso9762  Thank you, I have seen the entire video including this explanation I don't find plausible. I am a bit confused. Your reply would fit to the comment that disappeared (or I, for any reason, cannot see). Could you please tell me to which of my comments you replied?
    1