Comments by "" (@jeffreysetapak) on "What Vietnamese Think of Donald Trump | ASIAN BOSS" video.

Too bad they are neighbors with China and they have similar or even the same culture as China.
31
Wow!!! Vietnamese is not communist. Bravo.
23
Vietnamese should have claimed those islands and that area of South "CHINA" Sea during Ming dynasty.
6
Maybe next time Vietnam can try harder in UN and ask USA and UK to use their VETO power to so called stop China at South "CHINA" Sea.
6
That's why a BIG CHUNK OF INDIAN OCEAN is "OWNED" by India. And China NEVER deny that.
5
Too bad for all of you, Chinese has VETO power and USA cannot do much either. Oh, by the way, the island in the South "CHINA" Sea has completed and comes with a simple small airport.
3
@Z01D14N USA feed them shit and any excrement they are even more than happy to consume it.
3
International Arbitration Court=NO INTERNATIONAL LEGAL BINDING International Court of Justice=HAS FINAL SAY AND JUDGEMENT ON INTERNATIONAL LEGAL BINDING
3
Maybe some people here still cannot understand why the whole world even according to UN and ICJ that this sea is OFFICIALLY and LEGALLY called South "CHINA" Sea under international maritime law.
2
If anyone here don't like the name South "CHINA" Sea, I suggest you are more than welcome to bring this matter to ICJ (NOT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION that doesn't carry any legal weight/legitimacy under any international law, it's ONLY an arbitration court, NOT A LEGAL COURT).
2
Why nobody dare to bring this matter to International Court of Justice??? Simply because they know that they CANNOT and NEVER will win their claim over South "CHINA" Sea. And they just simply brought this matter to a "clown" arbitration court/center and try to claim as a final legal and official international judgement.
2
@S. Young But since Donald Trump seems like anti outsiders, maybe it's too bad for any Vietnamese planning to move to USA now.
2
@Chí Thiện Nguyễn In 4000 years, China didn't invade other countries, tribes and ethnic groups, simply because China didn't even exist yet. It was under so many countries like the Han, Shang, Qin, Sung, Wu, Tang, Yan, Zhou, Chu, Shu, Xianbei (Not even Chinese) etc etc and there are even times that the Chinese plain was NOT EVEN UNDER HAN Chinese rule, it was under the Manchurian, Khitan, Jurchen, Mongol, Tatar, the Xia and other nomadic tribes etc etc.
2
@Chí Thiện Nguyễn Oh, by the way. You have to thank the Mongolians, simply because the so called "CHINESE" empire was at its BIGGEST was during the Yuan 元 Dynasty, the Mongol dynasty managed to establish roughly the modern Chinese border that we know today.
2
@Chí Thiện Nguyễn The Mongolians also conquered Vietnam. during the Yuan Dynasty.
2
Chí Thiện Nguyễn Han, Shang ONLY invaded other Chinese states. If you want to put it that way, it ONLY can be considered as Chinese civil war.
2
That's why Vietnam is just another ignorant boot licking slave puppet of USA.
2
@van vo You didn't win the case, you ONLY win the arbitration which has no legal binding under UNCLOS which is important and compulsory for UN members to consider it mandatory.
2
@van vo You are dreaming and hallucinating. GOOD LUCK and CONTINUE to be BLINDED by your foolish ignorant PURE SENTIMENTS and EMOTIONS.
2
If China called the sea as South China Sea is so ILLEGAL and ILLEGITIMATE, the international maritime will not recognize it as SOUTH "CHINA" SEA. ACCEPT THIS BITTER FACT. If China so called still invade everybody, kindly bring the case to ICJ and don't bark like a USELESS MAD GOD HERE. LOL!!!!!
1
South "CHINA" Sea this name is THE OFFICIAL and LEGAL NAME of this sea UNDER INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW.
1
@JL Mina The "ORANGE" gave by USA also caused almost 60% of the farm land in Vietnam becomes non-arable for almost half a century until recently.
1
@van vo That is NOT international court, but ONLY INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, ICJ is the international court.
1
@Van vo Please be clear that international arbitration court IS NOT THE SAME as INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, IAC, the international arbitration HAS NO LEGAL BINDING and LEGITIMACY in international law or any international maritime law.
1
@van vo The reason why nobody dare to bring the case to ICJ is simply because they know that they have no basis, they have no ground against China.That's why they ONLY can bring the case to INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION INSTEAD of ICJ.
1
@van vo I repeat again: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION COURT or ICA is ONLY PART OF INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE that has NO LEGAL BINDING AND FINAL SAY or legitimacy in any international jurisdiction, it's ONLY an arbitration.
1
@van vo Regardless how the world sees it, China goes by rules and regulations, China don't go by sentiments and emotions BLINDLY like how Vietnamese behave.
1
@van vo ONLY those ignorant and people that ACT UPON SENTIMENTS and EMOTIONS BLINDLY will think that China lose the case.
1
@van vo Jungle law??? Sorry to disappoint you that the evidence and UNCLOS regulations UNCITRAL regulations stated VIVIDLY that the ARBITRATION is NOT MANDATORY for all UN members to abide or adhere.
1
@van vo ONLY decisions and final jurisdictions made by ICJ has the FINAL say in any international matters/issues/disputes.
1
@van vo Oh, try to upgrade until you are the second or third superpower of the world than you might try to so called take back the islands via war. WAKAKAKAKAKAKAKAKAKAKA!!!! :-P GOOD LUCK!!!
1
@van vo Final advice, instead of accusing China using jungle law, why don't you bring the case to ICJ and win the case??? :-P
1