Comments by "Mr. Brightside" (@mr.brightside6576) on "Ring Magazine" channel.

  1.  @BugMateo  technical wise, it was a hard fight for both.
    8
  2.  @commodoor6549  lmao whatever the result of the madrimov vs vergil has got nothing to do with bud vs madrimov cause styles makes fights. its a different scenario. That is basic boxing 101...you are clearly a bud hater. Bud won that madrimov fight without question. Majority of the rounds were competetive but the champ just didnt do enough and didnt threw enough to win the fight specially in the championship rounds.
    6
  3. canelo getting outboxed....
    5
  4. @ ...and madrimov was campaigning at middleweight in his long amateur days.
    4
  5. @ in what world?
    4
  6.  @Marco855-z7x  outlanding an opponent doesnt mean you win the round. It is still based on clean effective punching.
    4
  7.  @somedude3977  you never said anything to disprove his point. Skills are built at the amateurs. Madrimov is clearly a skillfull boxer whose got a solid amateur background and campaigned mostly at middleweight.Guys like inoue and loma were already fighting top level oppositions very early in their career cause they got solid amateur background.
    3
  8. @ lmao that world you are talking about doesnt exist...that is delusion.
    2
  9.  @Marco855-z7x  no he didnt. Most of the people claiming madrimov won are bud's haters. Even virgil ortiz said it wasnt really a competetive fight and said bud won decisively. His sentiments echoes majority of the most respected boxing personalities. Same thing with every floyd close or competetive fights, his haters will claim that floyd lost lmao.
    2
  10.  @cleancutstacks2261  how?...you thought he lost cause you prayed so hard for him to lose.
    2
  11.  @johnd1466  you talking like your boy never lost and never got outboxed lmao
    2
  12. @ that remains to be seen...there are boxers who carried their speed and stamina up to higher weights. Bud not draining those extra pounds could be good for him. He could be fighting at his natural weight.
    2
  13.  @PublicEnemy_1_  u sounda kinda ignorrramt with that kind of comment...he beat all the champions in two weightclasses making him undisputed twice.
    2
  14.  @AlmightyAnt300  just because its the biggest payday for bud doesnt mean he is not looking to beat your boy saul...dont ever think your boy is unbeatable when he already got losses and got outboxed by crafty fighters more than a few times.
    2
  15.  @oscar9mx512  so many close rounds but still a decisive win for bud.
    2
  16. @ you were clearly stating you were counting the punches...you never indicated if the punches landed were clean or effective.Nice try though...
    2
  17.  @sohanetwork3886  another trying hard wanna be lmao...though madrimov's style is very basic but it still very tricky cause of the faints and all the movements he was making that even a top pound for pound fighter like bud was having difficulty finding and timing him.
    2
  18.  @mar-k3s9k  true...the thing about canelo is he can be outboxed. You can never say a guy who already got losses and got outboxed more than a few times can be beat.
    1
  19.  @aldocuacuas5838  how is ryan clearing the lighter weightclasses when until now he never even won one single belt legitimately?
    1
  20.  @leroygreen214  haney vs ryan was for a title. He just cheated to win it.
    1
  21. @ actually you are right. I didnt realize that ryan was over the limit and the title was no longer on the line for him.
    1
  22. @ opinion that isnt based on facts, science, logic and honesty can be delusional. Madrimov performed really well against bud but he didnt school him. Maidana had a very close and competetive fight vs floyd but he never schooled him. You can never say a close and competetive fight is a robbery. That is delusion...you ae wrong again, you are comparing madrimov's performance vs bud and his going to be performance vs vergil. Those arent past records basis but fighting the same guy basis. Just because bud had a competetive fight against madrimov and then vergil will have an easy fight doesnt mean vergil is a better fighter than bud. You got poor history of the sport. There are a lot of boxing greats that at one point lost to a much lesser fighter. Again, styles makes fights.That is boxing 101 and you are supposed to be not a casual lmao...give me a break.
    1
  23. @ ...and how come i be lying to myself when you yourself said that either fighter could have won with no argument from you? I never said bud dominated madrimov. I clearly stated that majority of the rounds were close and competetive. I am the one who is giving merits on the actual fight while you were just giving your opinion without providing supporting details. You are the one who clearly lacks objectivity...and talking bout opinion, the main commenter made his opinion which is very valid but you rather bring up the race card which has got nothing to do with how he or shawn porter saw the fight.
    1
  24. @ nobody really cares about amateur but wether you care or not the amateur is where boxers developed their skills and european boxing amateur is big that is why you got guys like bivol, beterbiev, lomachencon are already champions and top rated boxers with just very few professional fights.
    1
  25. @ lmao more often...really?
    1
  26. @ your judgment is awful cause you didnt even know what is the main basis of judging a fight in the first place.
    1
  27. @ that is why your claim of bud being schooled by madrimov is too farfetch...simply out of touch with reality.
    1
  28. lmao beat crawford how?
    1
  29. by landing the cleaner more effective punches and winning the majority of the rounds.
    1
  30.  @Jair_montess  nah...not even with canelo on his peds.
    1
  31. @ like you got quiet when floyd and bivol beat his ass? lmao...we all know canelo has got issues with slick real good outboxers like lara...
    1
  32. @ still doesnt change the fact that he lost...
    1
  33. @ lmao madrimov has got very solid amateur background who was campaigning at middleweight...you dont know how european take their amateur status very seriously.
    1
  34. @ lmao you clearly got no clue bout the sport. Dont you know that guys like bivol and beterbiev turned professional so late but they became champions in less than 15 professional fights...that is because they have invested much in the amateurs. European amateur is big. That is why guys like lomachencko are already champions in just 3 professional fights...you clearly dont know boxing.
    1
  35. @ lmao loma's career is short lived cause he turned professional late but he became a three weight champion in only 12 professional fights and became the number one pound for pound fighter.Im not talking about their achievements or how great they are but im talking about their skillset and quality as a boxer which you got no clue of lmao...cause clearly you dont know boxing.
    1
  36. @ lmao people who got deep understanding of the sport call it outboxing,not running.
    1
  37. @ lmao i exactly know the difference. There are boxers who got solid amateur backgrounds who developed great boxing skills during their amateur years that when they enter the professional rankings they excel so much that they can compete with top ranking fighters even in their early years as a professional. Proof of that are inoue, loma, bivol, beterbiev, etcetera...madrimov is one of them. Instead of appreciating madrimov's skills, you made it a way to make bud look bad just because madrimov was competetive. That is real poor reasoning on your part.
    1
  38. @ lmao bud for years has already been considered universally in the boxing world as one of the best technical fighter in boxing today.There's no need to hype how great he is.Any true boxing fan would recognized that. I guess you got to deal with that fact lmao...you clearly dont know boxing. Styles makes fights. Madrimov is a guy who got over 300 amateur fights just like guys like loma and rigondeax...and madrimov campaigned at middleweight.Learn the sport and stop embarrassing yourself lmao.Learn to appreciate fighters.You are not a true fan of the sport.
    1
  39. ​@ lmao again, bud already established himself as a top pound for pound fighter for years. The boxing world already accepted how great his skills are. The madrimov fight didnt exposed anything. It was just bud was fighting a highly skilled fighter as well who has got solid amateur background and who was campaining at middleweight.Didnt canelo lost to bivol who only got 19 professional fight on his 61st professional fight?...where do you think professional boxers developed their skills?..style making fights would only be cliche to people who got poor understanding of the sport. That is exactly what happened in the bud vs madrimov fight. Madrimov's style of fighting and movement gave bud difficulty.You are a fanboy, clearly not a true fan of the sport.
    1
  40. @ lmao im giving you examples so that i could destroy your statements. You already got exposed as a fanboy. My job here is done. Game over.
    1
  41. @ im givving you examples so that i can destroy your absurd statements. You are already exposed. Game over.
    1
  42.  @Forteeseven47  you got exposed. game over...
    1
  43. @ that's one way to support an argument and destroy opponent's statements by giving examples...see you got lost for words lmao.
    1
  44. @ you keep repeating yourself cause you dont have statements based on facts and logic to support your argument...you got exposed. Deal with it like how you should deal bout bud being one of the best highly technical fighters in todays boxing wether you like it or not.
    1
  45. your boy aint unbeatable...
    1
  46. @ the one who lost twice against real good outboxers is more likely to lose again...
    1
  47.  @jumpingonoffthejet9377  how come he failed when he won lmao...canelo losing to floyd and bivol is a clear failure. Bud didnt get hit by madrimov like canelo got hit by lara.
    1
  48. he is already in his physical prime but few more fights or few more years to be in his peak.
    1
  49.  @johnd1466  that's real very good analysis...basing on a fight that happened more than a decade ago lmao
    1
  50.  @lo.lucci414  you are simply out of touch with reality.
    1
  51. calling a guy who cleaned two weight divisions a joke is the real joke.
    1
  52. lmao you clearly dont know what you are talking about.Learn first how boxing is scored and how judges based their judgment round by round.It should be EFFECTIVE AGGRESSION,not only aggression. You dont need to knockdown your opponents just to dethrone a champion. All you need to do is win 7 rounds which bud clearly did.
    1
  53.  @SuperTramp_29  it was a very close fight and most rounds were very competetive...i agree with you. 7-5 for bud is very reasonable.
    1
  54. bud is a special fighter...going up two weightclasses and beating the champ has been done more than a few times...canelo can be outboxed and has difficulty against really good outboxers and crafty, technical fighters...let that sink in.
    1
  55. was close but he clearly didnt win the fight.
    1
  56. crawford by split decision...
    1
  57.  @derwintomlinson9193  lmao nonsense. the fact that bud is going up two weightclasses and fighting probably the hardest hitter there makes your statement absurd.
    1
  58.  @busyinyahawahwayahawashi5369  how come bud cant take a punch when bud never got dropped with a punch?
    1
  59.  @Wakandafheva  you dont know boxing..ur clearly a fanboy.
    1
  60.  @FernandoMosqueda-xb7fx  lmao bud never got knocked down by mean machine.
    1
  61.  @themarathoncontinues2289  no...only fanboys who know nothing bout the sport will agree with you.
    1
  62.  @tedunseth3966  true...bud could be fighting at his natural weight. Not losing those extra pounds could be good for him. I can see bud winning as well. We'll see...
    1
  63. @ defense, ring generalship, and effective aggression are some of the criteria but it still boils down to clean effective punches which judges mainly based their scoring.
    1
  64. @ poor boy just exposes himself more that he clearly got very poor undersatnding of the sport...boxing is mainly scored and juddged based on clean effective punches.Just because the other guy landed more doesnt mean he automatically won the round cause again boxing is based on clean effective punches.
    1
  65. @ """Started too late? I had Madrimov ahead 5-0 after 5 rounds. Bud was confused, couldn't let his hands go. Madrimov kept landing that straight right, clean shots over and over."""...super delusional comment lmao.
    1
  66.  @Marco855-z7x  how will you know who won a close competetive fight when you dont even know the basis of judging a fight and how it is scored in the first place? lmao
    1
  67. @ you make zero sense at all. You clearly dont know much about the sport. Bud won a belt at 154 against a guy who has got a very solid amateur background who campagined mostly at middleweight.That showed that bud can hang in with a naturally bigger guy. Of course madrimov aint the same level as canelo cause he only got very few professional fights but canelo doesnt have madrimov's feints and all around movements.Your boy canelo already got losses and can be outboxed so never think he is unbeatable okay? lmao
    1
  68. @ lmao effective aggression, defense and ring generalship but at the end of the day it is mainly based on clean effective punching. I mean when did you start watching boxing lmao...
    1
  69.  @Marco855-z7x  lmao your statements clearly proves you dont know much...stop pretending. I know your kind.
    1
  70.  @Tdel04  VICTOR ORTIZ? LMAO
    1
  71.  @nkululekomyeza306  you dont know how boxing business and politics work. Cause madrimov is a champion at 154 while bud already cleared out and left 147. Try thinking first before commenting.
    1
  72.  @Marco855-z7x  not really...im always basing on facts and logic.
    1
  73.  @gustavofontalba  true but it clearly showed ortiz got hit more than bud.
    1
  74.  @erosbeltran3544  if amateur fights dont mean much then how come fighters like loma, rigondeax, bivol, beterbiev or even madrimov compete at a high level in just few fights?
    1
  75.  @erosbeltran3544  that is not how boxing works. madrimov being competetive to bud and another hungry young lion in ortiz just shows how good he is even with only 11 fights.
    1
  76. @ lmao you clearly dont know what you are talking about. Bud been a pound for pound fighter for almost a decade. He is there cause he deserved to be there. It's not just who he beat but it is the way he beat them with great skills and dominance.Bud been avoided for years by pbc fighters where many top rated welterweights belong.Saying bud's resume is thin is pure ignorance of the sport.Bud fought who needed to be fought which are the ones holding the belt making him undisputed in two weight classes and champ in four weightclasses.Amateurs still matters much cause that is where boxers hone their skills. European boxing is solid that is why some of them like the guys i mentiones are already competing at a high level even just in a few professional fights. Madrimov fought really well vs bud and ortiz considering he only got 11 professional fights.But you'd rather take something from bud cause clearly you are a fanboy.
    1
  77. @ nope im not a bud buddy but a true fan of the sport. I dont need to discredit vergil so i can make a point about bud.To answer your question, it would be hard to find a fifty fifty fight for bud cause his skiills are way too superior.Just like floyd did. Bud was i think had a fifty fifty fight vs gamboa and spence and he dismantled both of them.Arum cant even give terrrence the pacman fight how much more the pbc fighters? Bud signed an extension because of course money and arum's promise that he would make the spence fight.Bud left toprank for the very reason...what you are thinking is very childish. Fighters whose got the mentalit ylike bud doesnt think that way. Bud was always looking for the best fights available. Just like now, he is moving two weight classes to fight probably the biggest puncher at 168 so what you are saying doeswnt make any sense.
    1
  78. @ bud hasnt been fighting pfp fighters for a decade? didnt bud just beat fellow pound for pound fighter spence two years ago?...how will bud fight pound for pound fighters when there isnt much in his weightclass? isnt bud just going up two weightclasses to fight canelo?
    1
  79. @ your statement just goes to show how poor your understanding of the sport. Why would bud fight benavidez who literally is a 175 pounder now when he can fight canelo both for money and legacy? I mean canelo doesnt even fight benavidez and they are on the same weightclass. Lmao spence only got overrated the moment bud dismantled him but before the fight, guys like you said spence would break bud. Still, you are wrong saying bud never fought a pound for pound fighter.Mickey garcia? lmao. It's mikey you casual.Mikey was a good solid fighter himself so you cant just expect him to get annihilated by spence but for sure he was outclassed. Mikey was already a champion at 140 so saying mikey moved up two weightclasses is kinda inaccurate.Only bud haters would ever say bud avoided these fighters. Bud only avided them when he was already the man at 147, not when bud was with toprank.You clearly got logical issues.
    1
  80. @ poor boy you helding bud in such a high standards but wont set the same standards on your favorite fighter. Boxing is a business. Bud is in a position to get the biggest money in his boxing career and you want him to fight 154 pounders instead who cant give him the same money and legacy fighting canelo. If the canelo fight wasnt realistic then bud would have been fighting the 154 pounders but the opportunity presented itself and who would not want to get the biggest payday of their boxing career considering bud is on his way out?
    1
  81. @ Lmao but mikey was already a 140 pound champion but you still made it seem he was a lightweight.He was the one calling spence out. Nah name me a credible boxing personality that says bud is ONLY FIGHTING FOR THE MONEY. Bud is fighting both for money and legacy. Bud is a special fighter and he doesnt think the way you casuals and fanboys think. He is coming to fight and beat canelo.Crawford's resume is great.Pound for pound for almost a decade, undisputed in two weightclasses, champion in four weightclasses, dominating opposition, knocking all welterweights he fougt...again, only haters would not see this resume as a great one.
    1
  82. @ lmao you clearly got poor reasoning skills bro. You are clearly a fanboy not a true fan of the sport.Again, why would bud fight benavidez or janibek when he can fight guys at 154 for the same money? He is fighting canelo two weight classes up cause of the money involved.I know bud beat all the beltholders at 140 making him undisputed. That what matters. You fight the ones holding the belt. Of course the quality of opposition matters but bud fought who needed to be fought and dominated them wether they are ordinary champions or pound for pound fighter like spence. They all end up the same getting dominated or knocked out. There are levels to greatness but bud certainly showed greatness. Only haters cant see that one.
    1
  83. @ lmao anybody who thinks logically and factually will never say that very absurd statement cause clearly it didnt happened that way. Bud was looking for the big fights at 147 just like he did at 135 and 140 but it so happen that he was with toprank and all the other top rated welterweights were with pbc. He finally got his break and became the man at 147 when he dismantled spence. Right now at 154, he is clearly the man to beat. He is in great position not like in 147 that he was the one begging for the fights.He finally got the canelo fight. Good for him.
    1
  84. @ that is because bud isnt an ungrateful person. Bob arum build up his career. You just dont leave a promoter like that so that is maybe he gave him a chance but still arum was not able to make the spence fight.He is in great position right now cause he knocked out spence easy who was a fellow top pound for pound fighter and simply cause bud is a great fighter, not because turki took a liking on him. That is too childish thinking.
    1
  85. @ i agree on that.
    1