Comments by "D4RD1V" (@d4rd1v79) on "Putin Roars At Zelensky, Makes Big Declaration On Crimea After Russia Poll Victory | Watch" video.

  1. I belive he is talking about Pootin.
    3
  2. It is true that Crimea has a significant Russian population and historical ties to Russia, but it is important to provide a more nuanced perspective. Crimea has a complex history involving various rulers and empires. It was indeed conquered by Catherine the Great in the late 18th century and became part of the Russian Empire. However, it also had periods of control by other powers, including the Ottoman Empire and the Soviet Union. In 1954, Crimea was transferred from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic within the Soviet Union by Nikita Khrushchev. This transfer was largely symbolic at the time, as both Russia and Ukraine were part of the larger Soviet state. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Crimea became part of an independent Ukraine. However, tensions between the Russian-speaking population in Crimea and the Ukrainian government have persisted, culminating in the controversial annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014. While Crimea is now under de facto Russian control, its status remains disputed internationally, with most countries not recognizing Russia's annexation. Therefore, while Crimea has historical and cultural ties to Russia, its political status is still subject to debate and negotiation.
    3
  3. From an international perspective, the referendum on Crimea's accession to Russia in 2014 was not considered legitimate. The vote was organized swiftly following the Russian military intervention in the peninsula and under the presence of Russian troops, raising questions about its authenticity and fairness. Many countries and international organizations, including the United Nations, deemed the referendum not in line with international law or Ukraine's constitution. As a result, most countries have not recognized the outcome of this referendum and still consider Crimea to be part of Ukraine.
    2
  4. From an international perspective, the referendum on Crimea's accession to Russia in 2014 was not considered legitimate. The vote was organized swiftly following the Russian military intervention in the peninsula and under the presence of Russian troops, raising questions about its authenticity and fairness. Many countries and international organizations, including the United Nations, deemed the referendum not in line with international law or Ukraine's constitution. As a result, most countries have not recognized the outcome of this referendum and still consider Crimea to be part of Ukraine.
    2
  5.  @rinatst.petersburg6511  You wrote it yourself. Thanks for the confirmation.
    2
  6. When its ongoing war? Sounds like a Russian thing.
    2
  7.  @loumcast  While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences. Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation. Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted. Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability. In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
    2
  8.  @loumcast  While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences. Circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation. The question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted. The US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability. While the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
    2
  9.  @loumcast  While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences. Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation. Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted. Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability. In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
    2
  10.  @loumcast  While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences. Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation. Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted. Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability. In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
    2
  11.  @loumcast  While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences. Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation. Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted. Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability. In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
    2
  12. @loumcast While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences. Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation. Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted. Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability. In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
    2
  13. Have yall seen that "peace agreement? It was hilarious.
    1
  14. ​ @corvanna4438  agree
    1
  15. ​ @rinatst.petersburg6511  Your original comment contains some inaccuracies and bias. The description of Crimea's history is oversimplified and one-sided. The accusation that Kiev's actions led to threats and killings of Russians is generalized and lacks evidence. The claim that the CIA's "Ukrainian" project was "bloody and brutal from the beginning" is incorrect. The use of terms like "hypocrites" and "refusal to accept facts" is subjective and hostile, detracting from constructive discussion. Stating that "Russia doesn't care about hypocrites' recognition anymore" oversimplifies Russia's foreign policy and underestimates the importance of international legitimacy.
    1
  16.  @irinam.87  I understand the international version, but no, I'm not familiar with your homemade Russian version.
    1
  17.  @chadhaire1711  All you got botovsky?
    1
  18. See that Putler rockin' that Trump orange look, but with botox 😂
    1
  19. What have i missed? Russia winning? What?
    1
  20. But he needs a bunker 😂
    1
  21.  @ИринаРасторгуева-ф1в  Sorry don't speak vodka.
    1
  22.  @loumcast  While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences. Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation. Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted. Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability. In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
    1