Youtube comments of Banana (@439bananas).

  1. 294
  2. 210
  3. 189
  4. 173
  5. 128
  6. 105
  7. 87
  8. 70
  9. 53
  10. 52
  11. @nobcheesy Yes, Labour bought out a system that was too generous and open to abuse, but the answer is not to try to starve people to death. Well done incidentally for volunteering at a CAB. The current system of Universal Credit is costing more but is leaving people worse off, how is that value for money for the taxpayer? If you force people into poverty then they either suffer ill health and become a burden on the NHS or they commit acquisitive crimes out of need and cost the criminal justice system. At the moment I can foresee the sort of situation where homeless people will live in overcrowded squats and drug-resistant TB will become rampant amongst them and quickly spread to the general population. Desperate people do desperate things. Many will turn to prostitution, soon man or woman you will not be able to walk down the street without being asked if you are looking for business. Not to mention the inevitable upswing in sexually transmitted diseases that will accompany the resultant depression of prices that will be part and parcel of an increased market supply of these services. The human misery that all this has the potential to cause far outweighs the monetary savings. The current situation was caused, not by the poor, but by the banks' poor investments in the subprime market and the subsequent taxpayer bailout. You can bet your bottom dollar that no banker is paying to nowhere near the degree that any poor person will pay. It is just too convenient to portray the poor as villains of the piece, let's face it the tories are probably very aware that the poor do not vote for them so what better way to subvert democracy than to make the homeless and get them off the electoral roll so that they cannot vote you out of power.
    44
  12. 44
  13. 43
  14. 43
  15. 41
  16. 40
  17. 35
  18. 34
  19. 30
  20. 28
  21. 25
  22. 23
  23. 23
  24. 22
  25. 21
  26. 18
  27. 18
  28. 17
  29. 17
  30. 17
  31. 17
  32. 16
  33. 15
  34. 15
  35. 15
  36.  @SuperA1507  Well, you would have hoped that knowing that the parents were related, that genetic tests would have been done following the birth of any disabled child and the parents told the outcome and appraised of the likelihood of having more disabled children. I was born in 1969 and there was a disabled kid in my class at school. He was odd-looking, he looked like he had Aperts Syndrome and had been born with his legs on back to front. He had an older brother that was also affected and a younger sister too, their mother also had these facial characteristics. His older brother came home from work ill one day and went to bed, he was found dead in bed the next day aged 17/18. My classmate was also found dead in bed at the age of 22/23. Both brothers were found to have heart defects and after the second brother died their mother and sister were found to have the same defects and were successfully treated. The whole family had vast amounts of treatment over the years, you would have thought that after having 2 children with the same disabilities that they would have figured that more would be a likelihood. My classmate was not Asian and so I don't know how the disability arose with his mother, but it was inherited. Things are too PC these days and you can bet your bottom dollar that if there was the public campaign that there ought to be to put a stop to first cousin marriages, it would be branded racist when in fact all that any sane person wants is to protect the resources of the NHS and the welfare state by simply avoiding the creation of individuals whose lives are absolutely blighted by the sorts of conditions seen here.
    15
  37. 14
  38. 14
  39. 14
  40. 14
  41. 14
  42. 13
  43. 13
  44. 13
  45. 13
  46. 13
  47. 12
  48. 12
  49. 12
  50. I would be a bit careful about taking this guy's word as gospel. Sure all guys want a younger woman to a certain extent and women also overlook a man's age, but again only to a certain extent. That extent is if the man is RICH, if you are rich then there is always going to be some young chick that will be willing to do whatever, if you're not then sorry no matter how much you dream about 20 year olds, it is unlikely to happen. This is not necessarily such a bad thing, let's face it women in their 20s still want to be out having fun where as a guy in his 50s/60s wants to come home from work and put his feet up. Women are also well aware that a guy that is that age is not going to be their lover for very long and that they are going to be playing nursemaid and giving him bed baths and changing his incontinence pads possibly within a decade and so there would have to be something that compensates for that. Women are most desirable to men at below age 25 and men are going to be more desirable in the 30-35 age bracket. That means that people outside of those limits are simply less likely to find someone that is going to meet that criteria. As far as I can see the woman in the picture is reasonably attractive for her age and i am sure if she is happy to put a roof over some guys head then she would be able to find someone, but the chances are he is going to be 50+ and he is likely to be divorced and may well have children elsewhere. That is life, if you are not in the desirable age bracket then your options male or female are going to be reduced.
    12
  51. 12
  52. 11
  53. 11
  54. 11
  55. 11
  56. 10
  57. 10
  58. 10
  59. 10
  60. 9
  61. 9
  62. 9
  63. 9
  64. 9
  65. 9
  66. 8
  67. 8
  68. 8
  69. 8
  70. 8
  71. 8
  72. 7
  73.  @TheHelper151  I was MARRIED and had been with my ex for over 9 years. He did not like what childbirth had done to my body and there was domestic violence from him. We went to counselling, the therapist would not work with us together because she believed that he had a narcissistic personality disorder. He had an affair and by this time I was frightened for my own life and I had been given no option but to give him a second chance. He eventually gave me the option of giving up our child for adoption or he was going to leave to be with his mistress, there was no way that I would ever give up my child. He left so I started divorce proceedings, for a guy who had chosen to walk out on his wife and child he made the divorce hell. Things did not work out with the mistress and he continued to be violent during child contact handovers, my solicitor advised me that to involve the police would risk the judge seeing it as frustrating the court order and that I would be risking losing my child. He advised that I move to my parents and let them handle the handovers. I did and he decided to take us back to court. By then I had considerable video footage, including him threatening my 70 year old mother. CAFCASS removed support for contact due to HIS behaviour. Skip forward to 2015, the extra marital affair had not translated to real life and he had married a foreign woman in summer 2012, the police showed up on my parents doorstep, because he had attacked wife number 2 and they were now worried that I might be dead as I have functionally disappeared. I was told to contact the police in a different area, I did and was asked loads of questions as to what had caused our marriage breakdown. I gave them chapter and verse and unlike the divorce hearing this time I was believed. The police could not give me full details as to what had gone on because they have to be careful not to prejudice the trial. But I was told that things had quickly become violent when wife number 2 bought her kids to this country and that he had been remanded in custody for attacking her and that the starting point for sentencing for his crime was 5 years. Whilst they could not detail the assault, I know that a sentence that big equates to a charge of grievous bodily harm, this is a serious charge that results from serious injuries. Wife number 2 was so terrified of him that when she was discharged from hospital, she went straight to the police station and rescinded her statements and fled the country. As a result the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case. NO I DID NOT CHOOSE TO BE A SINGLE PARENT, I CHOSE TO BE ALIVE AND I HAVE LITTLE DOUBT THAT IF I HAD NOT CHOSEN TO DIVORCE AND LIVE IN HIDING THAT I WOULD NOT BE ALIVE TODAY AND NEITHER WOULD MY SON.
    7
  74. 7
  75. 7
  76.  @nicholdsouza6482  Yes, I know it is difficult when it involves children, I have a son with my ex and sadly, he suffers with autism and because of my ex's behaviour towards us we now cope pretty much alone as the courts put a stop to contact due to his behaviour. I don't know if you have tried marriage guidance, I found them very good, but mine did not want to improve the relationship and just thought that the grass is greener on the other side; the truth is the grass is greener where you water it. Long and short he had been having an internet-based affair. I answered the 'phone to her once and asked her to stop misbehaving with my husband as we had an 8 month old baby. She took no shit and made it abundantly clear that she felt that I had no right to tell her what to do and that if my husband was straying it was my fault. He left me to be with her, but she was not the type to take his shit and the grass really was not greener on the other side, she dumped him. Which of course meant that I refused to take him back and he absolutely played up throughout the divorce and after. He went on to marry a lady from a very poor country, who already had 4 children that were not his, she also had a pile of debts and she did not work, I didn't come with any debt or anyone else's children and I worked. This lasted all of 3 years, when the police turned up on my parent's doorstep concerned about my welfare. It turned out that I was not the only one to suffer from his behaviour, he attacked wife number 2 and during the process of police investigations more evidence came to light that landed him in prison on remand. My advice make a reasonable effort to make it work with outside marriage guidance, if he does not make the effort and he is making you miserable then do not stand for it, life is WAY TOO SHORT, to waste it being unhappy. He will either step up and realise that his behaviour is risking his marriage and will make the changes to save the situation because he values your relationship or he won't. Please just remember that our children use us as their model for their own future relationships. So generally little girls choose men that are like their fathers in relationships and little boys look to their fathers to model what a husband should look like and will emulate his behaviour in their own adult relationships. Sadly, this means that to continue in a bad relationship, risks passing on bad relationships to the next generation. Good Luck
    7
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79. 7
  80. 6
  81. 6
  82. 6
  83. 6
  84. 6
  85. 6
  86. 6
  87. 6
  88. 6
  89. 6
  90. 5
  91. 5
  92. 5
  93. They did not inject cancer. Monoclonal antibodies are made in a complex way. I will try to explain. Firstly, you identify a unique molecular sequence on the type of cell that you wish to kill. Secondly, you get the sequence made up in relative bulk. Thirdly, you mix the sequence with something to make it dirty so that an animals immune system will react to it by producing antibodies to the target sequence, this is called Freund's adjuvant. You inject your animal with this inoculant. Fourthly, you harvest the animals immune cells. Fifthly, you take those immune cells and fuse those cells with a myeloma line that does NOT produce any proteins itself, this is done by adding anti freeze. The resulting hybridoma line is immortal as long as you keep feeding it. You then have to pan out any unfused cells by using selective growth medias and then you have to identify the correct cell line by a combination of repeated passaging and the use of mimotope dot blots and Enzyme Linked Immuno Assay techniques. Once you have found your clone you then have to expand the numbers for both a seed bank and to use for creating the drug. When you have decent numbers of cells they are put in a hollow fibre fermenter, where they are kept warm and fed oxygenated nutrients by pumps. The hybridoma cell lines put out monoclonal antibodies. The nutrient mix is spun at high speed to make the cells and cell fragments drop out, these are then disposed of. The remaining nutrient soup then contains the valuable monoclonal antibodies. This is passed through a chromatography column packed with a protein A sepharose gel. The antibodies stick to this gel and the crap flows through. The raw soup is tested by electrophoresis to establish the isoelectric point of the antibody. This the turning point where the arrangement of folding can be changed by the addition of salt. The drug can then be washed off the separation column by a sterile solution of salt at the appropriate concentration. The salinity of the drug is then adjusted to that of the human body and its concentration is measured photospectroscopally. Dosimetry is then calculated and any adjustments made. The drug is then passed through a sterile filter and dispensed. The dispensed drug is stored frozen and upon thawing it should be dispensed into an IV drip with a sterile filter between the syringe and the needle, just in case any of the protein based drug has either precipitated out or aggregated as proteins are want to do.
    5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. 5
  101. 5
  102. 5
  103. 5
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. 4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 4
  126.  @sagemorrigan153  As a parent of a child with autism, I completely agree with 'Bring on 2021'. There is a spectrum of autism from mild to severe and to be honest my marriage did not last and neither did that of 3 of my friends who have children with autism. Many guys just leave their partners to cope with it and while that is not ideal when the children are younger, it is even worse as they get older and mum starts to find it difficult to cope with an adult that is lashing out at them. One of my friends who is on her own has 3 children the oldest has severe autism and then she has twin boys that were only 2 to 3 years younger. The oldest grew into a six foot odd man mountain that must have weighed 20 stone. He picked my friend up and threw her across the dining room, breaking the table in the process, he was given Respiridon to quieten him down but he was allergic to it. He has had to be taken into care and has to have 2 male carers with him all of the time because he is so strong and volatile, the worry was that he could seriously injure my friend or her other children, well if it takes 2 male carers to look after him 24/7, you can see what the danger was to my friend. I have not worked since my son has been born and we are reliant on state benefits. This month my son's DLA stopped because he is 16 and I now have all the worry of trying to sort out the Personal Independence Payments for him. I am terrified that they either will not be paid or be paid at a really low rate. He is inclined to be extremely clumsy and therefore destructive, he has broken his own bed, damaged the toilet flush so that does not work anymore, broken the toilet seat and the join between the toilet and the soil pipe is leaking, he has broken goodness knows how many chairs, door handles and pulled the stair hand rail off numerous times. To be honest I need those benefits just to keep up with repairing and replacing the number of things that he has damaged. It is not just about the impact that autism has on its sufferers but also about the impact that it has on the quality of life of their carers too and the serious lack of state support for both parties.
    4
  127. 4
  128. 4
  129. 4
  130. 4
  131. 4
  132. 4
  133. 4
  134. 4
  135. 4
  136. 4
  137. 4
  138. 4
  139. 4
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. Forcing people to apply for jobs that are manifestly unsuitable is not the way either. Generally, when an employer advertises a job they want around 30-40 applicants, of which they would expect to find 5-6 suitably qualified or experienced candidates, whom they will interview. A larger mass of applicants just leads to a needle in the haystack hunt, that is costly and time-consuming. I have been in this position myself. I was being pushed to apply for all sorts of positions, so I applied for a job in Cambridge University radiology department. They gave their candidates a surprise maths test, that revolved around dosimetry. As you can imagine, I did my level best to produce a precise and accurate graph for the figures given that amounted to a straightforward linear graph. The last question being that if x was a certain value, then what would I predict y to be. My answer was that this could be predicted in 2 ways: firstly by simply extrapolating the line; secondly, that the line conformed to a y=mx+c equation where m=gradient and c=y intercept. With the proviso that this did not always work for all apparent straight lines, for example in Hooks law inevitably the relationship broke down as the spring deformed. That day I received a 'phone call, to my surprise, they deemed me too smart for the position they had on offer. Very flattered, but that is a few hours of my life I'm not getting back and I assume that the interviewers have better things to do than reviewing unsuitable candidates. What you really need is people producing good quality applications for the few positions that suit their qualifications and experience, rather than a scattergun approach.
    3
  151. 3
  152.  @chrisrobles2012  Sex has a great deal of importance in a relationship it is our means of connection to the other person. Part of the problem is that a woman can wind up feeling stressed out by all the responsibilities and chores, so this is not a great place to start sexually. Try to take some of the pressure off her. If you usually clean the windows and do the gardening and clean the car, then try paying people to do these tasks and use the spare time to help in the house a little. Kids can also be somewhat inhibiting too. Put them to bed late at night on Friday, get them up early on Saturday and have them do something really active in the day time so that they are begging to go to bed early on Saturday night. Now your wife is a bit rusty in the old sex department, so you need to start SLOW. Get a light takeaway in. Run her a bath and then when she is all relaxed give her a massage. Tell her the only rules are that she MUST NOT touch you as this is solely for her enjoyment and if there is anything that you do that she does not like she is to tell you and you will stop immediately. Massage her all over except do NOT touch her lips, nipples, vagina or anal area. Start with some feathery strokes down the back and don't forget to massage her hands and feet. Use a variety of strokes, pressures and speeds. Tell her all she needs to do is breathe deeply, relax and enjoy. This is called sensate focusing. Do it again on Sunday night, do not make any sexual moves on her at this stage. Next weekend ask her to reciprocate, but do NOT initiate sex. Notice where and how she touches you, because this will tell you what she liked. The following weekend when you start your massage of her you can bet that she will be so aroused, at this stage you can extend the massage to the erogenous zones, but still do not go for sex, leave that for next weekend. Then you should be getting back on track.
    3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. I know exactly what you mean. I have a disabled son and my husband walked off, but prior to that I worked and lived in a far more middle-class area. The area that I moved to has far more of these types. One mother lives on the council estate and was reckoned to be cleaning for an old couple and the next thing you know she was arrested for defrauding them of £8k over 12 months. She tells everyone that she was innocent, but frightened so she plead guilty. The only thing we can think if she is not guilty is that she must have been defrauding the DWP or something. What gets me is that she still keeps plastering pictures of her and the kids on holiday in exotic locations over facebook. Another child that lived with her grandmother was appallingly behaved at primary school, she moves off to live with the mother and does not start the local secondary school. The mother was allegedly involved with drink and drugs and the child is then taken into council care. The child is now 15/16 and last month the mother committed suicide aged 33. Another child that happened to be in my son's class this time. The mother has 8 kids by various different blokes, she has never worked, lives in a council house, kids have been in care. Her oldest kid she had at the age of 19 and dumped him to live with the grandmother. The kid had Aspergers, but they still let him run the streets where he was getting into trouble, but despite being charged with crimes they were never tried because of his mental state, this kid winds up being killed and the circumstances around this means that there was a massive Independent Police Commission inquiry. Another of her kids that was in my son's class continually bullied my son in the final year of primary and despite going in regularly and telling the school to keep them apart they chose to blame my son, because of course I am the decent person that does not show up and shout my mouth. This child was expelled within a week of starting high school. He went onto another school where other parents I knew had children and was a nightmare there too and we believe he was expelled from there too. There were rumours all around the primary that the kid had behaved in an inappropriate way with younger children and the next thing you know his uncle was convicted for child porn. That family are a Jeremy Kyle show in themselves.
    3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187.  @spencerwilton5831  If a child has autism they generally need one parent at home full time. My son has autism and my husband walked out when he was 10 months old. In the early years there are many, many appointments to take your child to and meetings at school over and above that which a 'normal' child might have. My son needs more supervision than a 'normal' child, because he has no sense of danger and is unable to sequence tasks. His sleep patterns are also highly disturbed. His sensory problems mean that the home has to fit around him to give him a complete break from the outside world. When my son was 7, I was asked to investigate work, the reality is that I have moved to a very quiet rural location and I am an hour away from the sort of towns where I might find the sort of scientific work that I am qualified to do. I went to the only childminders in our area and talked to them about childcare. Their response was that disabled children have to be cared for on a 1:1 basis rather than the usual 1:6 basis and that they would need to find someone suitably qualified to care for an autistic child, because this is a condition of their insurance, as a result childcare in 2012 would have cost at least £10:30 per hour. I would have needed at least 4 hours care per day on school days and 10-11 hours during the holidays. I could not afford to work on that basis alone, but when you factor in that I would lose benefits, plus school meals, free prescriptions and dental treatments and council tax exemption, I could not make it pay.
    3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. This is bollocks, the only bit that is true is that women in their 30s are more likely to be serious about forming a relationship which will result in having children. The worrying bit is that the guy says at the beginning of the video that a woman in her 20s allows you the leadership role. Sorry, excuse me, but relationships are not about leadership, but about partnership. Here is the newsflash once you have kids whether it is with a woman in her 20s or a woman in her 30s, it is a whole new dynamic, there is no difference between a 20 year old and a 30 year old once you have kids. When kids become part of the equation you BOTH have a responsibility to them. Many people still live in traditional households and yes the fun goes out of the window when you have a newish baby, as dad should be tired from working all hours God sends to provide for and give their new child a good start in life. And new mothers should be shattered from all that breastfeeding, night time colic, nappy [diaper] changing and the never-ending piles of laundry. As for your relationship, you should carve out one Saturday per month where you blow some money on a romantic meal out and you have a lie-in and some adult fun time on the Sunday. Grandparents are usually only too happy to help out every other month or maybe even more. It is important to look after your relationship, but anyone responsible has got to realise that children require a lot of energy and it is tiring looking after young children. You know guys if you are not pulling a 60 hour plus week at work, would it really hurt to take some of the pressure off your wife by perhaps looking after the kids so that she can have a nap or perhaps doing the washing up after a meal? The most worrying phrase is: "If you even so much as contemplate leaving her" "then you are horrible and acting selfishly". Damn right if you have kids and as a father you go off and abandon them to spend your resources on other people, then you are selfish. Once you have kids they are not just the responsibility of the mother UNLESS the mother has been told that you only intend to be a sperm donor. Reality check, woman gets pregnant and from the second she is pregnant she has to look after not only her health, but the health of the unborn child too. No alcohol, although it still tastes good, no liver, no pate, no mushrooms, no rinded soft cheeses or blue cheese or unpasteurised milk cheeses, no uncooked or partially cooked eggs, so no mayonnaise, no cured meats, no undercooked meats, no game, no swordfish, marlin or shark. It goes without saying no drugs, even the legal variety without checking them out first and even caffeine is bad for baby. No heavy exercise or lifting. This is not to mention the physical effects of pregnancy, morning sickness, or backache as the growing bump deforms your spine, or the constant heartburn and reduced lung capacity as the bump pushes up into the thorax and displaces organs there, or the need to go urinate more regularly or the baby kicking through half the night. Or even the pain of birth and blood loss. Or the joys [pains more like] of breastfeeding. No in this video it is all about the needs of this guy and his dick. Use your sense, if a woman is in a relationship where she wants children, she is unlikely to want a guy who is not able or willing to provide for her child, this would be unfair on the guy and more importantly irresponsible to the child.
    3
  198. 3
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271.  @TheFirstWhiteRanger  Not sure if you are replying to my comment. But here goes: First lady received a suspended sentence. Second parent had dumped her child with the grandparent, before taking back control of the child and moving the child 25 miles away, for some reason that child wound up in care and the mother has committed suicide. Third situation oldest kid was murdered, youngest rumoured to have behaved inappropriately with younger children and his uncle was convicted for indecent images of children. Had been to the school on numerous occasions to complain that her child was bullying mine, but the school did nothing about it as I am not as aggressive as the other mother and they seemed to find it more convenient to blame my son. The teacher gave my son a rotten report, despite the fact that my son has autism and had worked extremely hard and passed ALL his SATS tests scoring in the top 0.5% for spellings, punctuation and grammar. It was not until some of this child's other misbehaviour came out 2 years later that I actually received an apology from the particular teacher. I was not happy as those reports follow the children into secondary education and it could have potentially blighted my son's school days. It is now 3 years on and my 14 year old son has been invited to speak at a conference at Cambridge University about computer programming and he has just won an award at school for his overwhelming positivity and achievement in the face of adversity. The problem with these sorts of people, their bad behaviour is very deeply entrenched and it seems to pay dividends, so they simply will not change.
    2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. Keeping it simple and not getting into unnecessary arguments is sane advice. Try not to wind up your ex it is just is not worth it. My ex used to show up for contact when he chose to and was totally inconsistent. If you do this your child gets to know that you are unreliable. Mine also used to keep showing up and boasting about his latest shag. He was told repeatedly that I did not regard it as any of business who he was bedding. He did this repeatedly and made out that I was only saying that I did not care because I was jealous. All I did was make sure that I looked glamorous whenever he showed and I would stick a big bunch of flowers in the window for when he returned with our son. I never said anything specific that I was dating anyone, but I knew that doing this would make him wonder. Then one evening my son vomited during child contact and of course he wanted to bring him home, unfortunately, I was out with friends so he could not reach me. He was furious when he returned our son, he got the response that all children get ill and that I do not demand that he is around to deal with his son when is ill on my watch. He demanded to know where I had been and he got the answer that I did not consider it my business what he got up to on the 13 out of 14 nights that he was not responsible for our son, it was, therefore, none of his business what I got up to on my fortnightly night off. Show up to parents evenings and if your kids have any serious medical appointments. Mine despite being invited did not and that is part of the reason the courts put a stop to contact. If things are rocky to start with it is worthwhile suggesting a contact book to deal with issues relating to your child's welfare. Be careful what you write in this, it very quickly becomes court evidence, as it did in my case, but it can work in your favour. So to start a contact book you need to stress that it exists to help you both efficiently co-parent your offspring and that you are requesting that your child's mother copies you in on details such as: where your child is going to school, who their teacher is, progress reports, parents evenings, school plays and sports days, class outings. Ask who their doctor is and ask to be kept up to date with what has gone on with any illnesses, inoculations, courses of treatment and future appointments. It should go without saying that you should turn up to any events outside of working hours to support your child, you should also take holiday if parent's evening clashes with work or if your child has a major hospital appointment. In time your ex will appreciate you as a supportive parent. Christmas and birthdays are going to be fraught times. Don't buy a present and you will come off as a mean jerk, buy something generous when you are being really tight about child maintenance and you will come off as buying your kid's love. If you are planning on buying something big, discuss it with the mother and say that you would like to send it as a present from both of you. Try buying practical presents for birthdays, so for instance a school rucksack and water bottle and pencil case or lunch box can be a good combo and toys at Christmas when your child might get bored during the holidays. If you want to wangle yourself a few extra days contact during the summer holidays, an easy way to do this will be to offer to sort out the new term's uniform and shoes and coat, for this time. It is a costly chore that no mother enjoys, she will probably be frazzled from 5 weeks with the kids and will be grateful that you are taking on this chore. Just DO NOT buy that lycra belt oops I mean mini skirt that your daughter will insist all her friends are wearing. You want to come off as a responsible supportive parent who is able to put aside your past differences with your ex to provide your child with the best childhood possible under the circumstances.
    2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. We all pay tax and National Insurance to cover us in times of need and those who are unable to work. There are some people who are simply scroungers, but many are in situations that are not of their own making and no one should be punished with poverty for that. During my working life, I paid £75,000 in tax. I was with my husband for over 8 years when I had our child and within 10 months he was off. I divorced him and was forced to pay him £80,000 and could no longer afford to live where my industry as a research scientist is based. It was then found that my son had a condition called Deficits in: Attention; Motor co ordination and Perception with Pragmatic Disorder, he went on to be diagnosed with autism. As you can imagine I now live in a cheaper area in the back of beyond. The Jobcentre has been on my case and have asked me to investigate work. It would be impossible to make work pay here. Care for my son would cost at least £10.30 an hour, as insurance for childcarers demands that disabled children are looked after on a 1:1 basis by a suitably qualified carer. He would require at least 4 hours a day care and that is just during term time, in the holidays it would be more like 10 hours a day. You can see that by adding in travel costs of 45 miles a day, that actually it would leave us with nothing to live on. It is way cheaper for the state to pay the benefits that it pays me then to pay for my child to be in care. If my benefits were stopped, I would have no choice but to put my child into the care system, as I would not be able to realistically work, for one thing I am too knackered! As a carer, I am a member of various groups that have bought me into contact with foster parents and social workers, many children in the care system have disabilities, some of them not as bad as my own son and with two parents to care for them. The basic pay for a foster carer is around £450 per week per child and that is for non-complex cases, carers of children with disabilities are paid even more. That is not too mention the costs of social workers and reports and care hearings in the courts. I can tell you that every time that I stepped foot in court during my divorce it cost me £3000-£4000. In care hearings, both the state and the parents are represented by legal teams that are funded from the public purse. Very expensive. Similarly, if you stop people's benefits and they become desperate they are apt to turn to crime, not from greed, but from need. Who wants prostitutes, drug dealers and muggings on their street and who wants to pick up the resultant policing, court and prison costs, not me or you I would bet given that these functions cost a lot more than simply paying a fair system of benefits. Do I feel guilty about claiming benefits? No, I do not. Not only did I pay indirectly into the system, but during the time that I worked I was involved in the development of one drug now on the market and I cloned a cell line that also produces a drug that is used for arthritis and Crohn's disease that is also on the market. Later in my career, whilst working with a group who were trying to develop an autologous blood device, I suggested an alternative development. Essentially, the other scientists were in the process of developing a novel aerosol. It worked like this: blood shed during surgery was collected and kept in the bottom of the aerosol where it was kept liquid by balls of agar with heparin attached to them. When surgery was finished and the patient sewn up, the wound would then be sprayed, the blood would pass through a second stage where it would mix with a proprietary coagulant and it would then form an immediate protective scab of the patients own blood over the wound site. My development was to suggest that if we could get the proprietary coagulant to stick irreversibly and stabily to agar, then we could make sheets of agar and attach the coagulant and use it as a dressing to stop bleeding. As far as I am aware, it is not licensed for general use as yet, but it has been used on the battlefield to good effect and apparently, a helicopter medic had some packs when he was called to an incident where a tree surgeon had accidentally cut his own throat and the dressing saved his life. Austerity was caused by the taxpayer bailout of the bankers that unwisely invested in the subprime market. I do not see any bankers paying for their mistakes in the way in which the poor of this country have paid. Not to mention the rich individuals and companies that do business here, but do not pay tax here. Maybe it is time that you did not swing your axe so broadly and took a surgical swing at the real cause of the problems. The Tory party and it's media mouthpieces are only too happy for the poor of this country to take the blame for their poor management whilst they and their cronies line their pockets at our expense. Too many sheeple buy the lies.
    2
  353.  @cedricworthingtonbroadaxe2287  Completely agree that there is shocking wastage. The NHS is a case in point, where there are too many expensive pen pushers at the expense of frontline staff, drugs and equipment. There is no joined up thinking. The drug that I helped to develop, that work was half funded by the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. Part way through clinical trials Wellcome was taken over by Glaxo, who did not want to continue funding our project as they saw the product as being a competitor to drugs that they produced. They stopped funding us and the Medical Research Council would not pick up the other half of the bill. So all of our cell lines were sold off via the British Technology Group. Now, 1.2ml of this drug costs £7045 and the other drug whose cell line that I cloned costs £419 per 100mg, because they are sold by big pharma. I find it immoral that many people worked very hard to discover these drugs and we all worked way over a 37 hour week, for these drugs whose discoveries were funded by the British taxpayer are not available on the NHS. Why would you not have a parallel drug industry, where drugs discovered in MRC funded labs are produced free of charge for our own NHS and all the quantity that is produced in excess of our needs are sold to other countries with the profits being ploughed back into the NHS and further research? Could it possibly be that too many politicians have personal interests in big pharma? Two friends of mine are Cambridge graduates who have set up a charity for non-neurotypical individuals who are unemployed. The idea is that lots of autistic individuals are really good with computers and as they are unemployed they could be using that time productively by receiving some free training that would get them into a job. However, their efforts are being completely thwarted by the Jobcentre's completely beaurocratic and inflexible approach to 'conditionality'. Yet the crazy rules mean that people with degrees are being sent on basic numeracy and literacy courses that are a complete waste of taxpayer's money. Now whilst I wouldn't say that my writing or mathematics are perfect, they go way beyond the crap taught in these courses, you would have thought that they might have figured that if you have worked in a lab that you do not need to be taught how to do percentages. It is yet another example of the non joined up thinking and money wasting that goes on. Sense just does not come into it.
    2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360.  @shielamariehankinson3824  Then you will know that surgery is even more of an unknown than drug trials. Surgery really is flying by the seat of your pants stuff and definitely not for the faint-hearted, however much surgeons earn they sure earn every penny of it. The reality with clinical trials is that drugs go through a battery of tests mandated by the Geneva Convention before they get anywhere near administering a drug to a human. In general they first go through chemical tests in the lab and then on to tests in the lab in cultured tissues to try establish the action of the drug/ toxicity. The drug then goes into lab animals usually starting with rats or mice to establish the LD20. This is the dose at which 20% of the animals die, this is usually expressed as mg/kg, in other words how many milligrams per kilogram weight of the animals that results in the death of 1 in 5. This is extrapolated to give a safe dose for usually either monkeys or dogs, at this stage it is looked to model the disease as well. The reality is that frequently there are already similar classes of drug out there, so there is some level of prediction of a drugs action. So for instance monoclonal antibodies, as in this case, your own bodies make a cocktail of antibodies in response to the pathogens that it meets every day. If your body comes up against a big challenge, you get 'flu for instance, then the presence of antibodies will massively ramp up your bodies immune reaction to give you the classic fever/headache combo of 'flu. The same thing happens when you put artificially produced antibodies into people, their bodies ramp up cytokine production and these cytokines can attack your own tissues, if you have got the dose wrong. In general antibody doses are tiny, in the 2-10 mg category once every few weeks, compare that to paracetamol where a typical dose would be 1,000mg up to 8 times a day and you can see that antibody drugs are powerful and there is not much room for error. Nevertheless, the people that ran this trial were extremely negligent in that they did not use the long established protocols for the use of this class of drug.
    2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385.  @milasuljagic7913  Actually in this case "the could not predict the outcome" get-out clause would be unlikely to hold much water. You see the drug was a monoclonal antibody and at the time of these tests, it was well known that not only do they provoke the immune system, but that the immune system can respond to such provocation with a cytokine storm as seen here. Back in '93 I was making monoclonal antibodies for clinical trials myself and a number of our lines were further on in the trials process than this drug. The drug itself was added to a saline drip prior to running a very slow infusion. That way if any adverse reactions are observed, then the drip can be stopped before the patient has received the whole dose. Our box insert also said that an anti-inflammatory drug called Prednisolone needed to be on standby in case the patient had a severe reaction. Given that cytokine storms are a recognised adverse reaction for this class of drugs and that there existed at the time protocols to ameliorate any adverse reaction, the question is likely to be: why did they not follow a suitable protocol. Usually, these trials have to be approved by an ethics committee, did the committee realise the risks of these class of drug and if not were they competent? Or did the drug company put forward a suitable protocol, but the clinical trials company fail to adhere to the protocol because it meant more work and resources? So the legal issues are likely to come down to who is responsible for the outcome, which is likely to be either the drugs company jointly with its ethics committee or a rogue, external clinical trials company that has failed to follow protocol. Either way despite any waivers that have been signed by the trial participants, the drug company, its ethics committee and the clinical trials company ALL have a duty of care to the test subjects both individually and severally jointly. Under UK law it is extremely likely that given these factors, the test subjects have a case for negligence against at least one of these parties.
    2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. OK here is the story of my ex he had an affair and walked out on me and our 9 month old son. Affair did not translate well to real life. He went on to marry a woman from Zimbabwe. This woman had debts [unlike me when I married him , I had savings], she had no job [I worked] and she had 4 kids that my ex was paying for in Zimbabwe. We found this out because he stopped paying child maintenance for our son, so I took him back to court. She was no more attractive than me and she had the cheek to say I should go to work. I responded with "I do not work because my son is disabled, perhaps you are the one that should go to work as your kids are being looked after by your mother in Zimbabwe. But you see how badly he is treating his own disabled son, well just think on your kids are not his kids, if he can treat his own flesh and blood this badly, perhaps you should think about how he will treat you and yours when he has had enough of you" This was 2014. Skip forward to December 2015, my parents get a visit from 2 police officers checking on my safety, they call me and I am told that I must get in touch with the police in another area with regards to my ex. Now my ex had his child contact revoked in 2010 because his behaviour was so bad. So when I spoke to the police it transpired that Miss Zimbabwe had bought 2 of her kids to live in this country and the relationship descended into violence. Long and short, my ex spent 3 weeks over Christmas in prison on remand. The sad thing is he hid £250k in the divorce which meant that I had to pay him £80K, this meant I had no choice, but to sell up and move away and the areas that have biotech industries are too expensive for me to live in. Other work is not profitable because of the increased care costs for a disabled child. We currently live 60% below the poverty line, but I can tell you what, I bet she walked away with a damn sight more than I did even though she never contributed to the household and her kids are not even his kids.
    2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. OK the reality is that NO ONE IS PERFECT, but there are a lot of people out there that are a good enough match for you to have a good relationship with as long as you are both prepared to invest in the relationship. If you are cheating then it winds up that you are not only cheating on the other person but you cheat on yourself. When people cheat, they think that the grass is greener on the other side the reality is that the grass is greener where you water it. While they are chasing after the illicit partner they are not putting the work and effort in to feed their legitimate relationship and it withers and dies. Meanwhile the affair goes great guns, but probably only because it exists in a bubble. When you have an affair you are not with that person 24/7 and as a result both parties make a big effort to ensure that everyday life does not intrude. The man in the affair, scrubs up, shaves, uses deodorant, changes his socks, buys flowers and gifts for his mistress. The mistress is manicured and perfect and wearing heels and sexy lingerie. They do things together, nice meals sometimes holidays etc. That is not real life 24/7. Real life is when the central heating fails and the baby pukes over with you and you've got to get on and do the washing up. If you are cheating it detracts from the effort that you should be making to make your legit relationship work, you are chasing after a fantasy that exists in a bubble and bubbles are ultimately fragile and prone to bursting. Sooner or later either you will be found out or you will disappear off into the sunset with your lover and even if it is the later, it probably won't be the end of the story. You see when someone gets together with someone as a result of cheating, the mistress always wonders if they are going to be cheated on themselves. Mistrust is not the greatest basis for a relationship. If you do not want mutually exclusive partnerships then do yourself a favour and be honest about it. Go polyamorous, it has to be easier than all of the deceit and recriminations that result.
    1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469.  @misss299  OK, so what is she doing, she is hoping that this guy will leave his wife and kids for her? And you think that she can not see that when that happens those kids are going to be a lot worse off financially, because 9 times out of 10 that is what happens when people get divorced, Its the kids that are totally blameless that suffer the most. Divorce is common enough for us all to know people who are divorced with kids and to see its effects on the kids. I agree that the guy is more responsible, but that does not exonerate her actions. To draw an analogy, it is like you and a friend going out and stealing a car. You see the person unhook the lock on it, so you 'hotwire' it for them and you both drive off together. OK so it might have been the other person that initiated the theft and was the one that was driving, but you have still actively participated in the theft. That is called aiding and abetting a crime or the other phrase that is used is 'joint enterprise' and the idea of someone being wrong because they were involved is a legal concept. Years ago, if a man went off with another woman the judge would award that if the guy could not pay child support then the other woman had to pay. I even heard of one case, before the age of DNA testing where a man got his girlfriend pregnant and because he didn't pay for his own child, he got 5 of his mates to lie and say that they had all slept with the woman too and so the child might not be his. His attempt to make his girlfriend look like a slag, might have worked, but it backfired on the friends big time because the judge made them ALL pay some child support for the child as he judged them all equally responsible.
    1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. If someone is angry does this guy not think it is a good idea to find out what the cause of the anger is? Is it being caused by something external or is it something that you are actually responsible for? In my case with my ex husband I would tell him a number of times that what he was doing was winding me up, but he would still continue to do crap. Typical example. It is the weekend of our son's christening, his parents, my parents and the vicar are all coming for lunch. He has not been asked to contribute in any way to the preparations other than to stay out of the way. I have got up at 5 am and started to do the housework and start the food. I quietly get on with it and see to our 8 month old son while he lies in bed till 10 am. He comes down stairs and immediately leaves a mess in the clean bathroom. He makes himself a coffee and I tell him to drink it in the kitchen where the mess can be contained, but no, he drinks it in the dining room and spills it on the freshly starched tablecloth. 'I told you to drink that in the kitchen, why did you ignore me? LIke I don't have enough stress on without needing to starch another tablecloth.' Starch a new cloth and continue setting out and preparing food. I am now really pressed for time, so the last thing that I need is for him to start eating the food off the table as I am running backwards and forwards between preparing food and laying it out, but of course that is exactly what he does. Has no understanding that I am annoyed that he is spoiling the appearance of the food by picking at it and it is rude to start eating before the guests arrive. We have assembled guests and have lunch. I ask him to continue conversation and take care of our son while I take care of organising the coffees for everyone, instead he buggers off to bed. He then wonders why I am so angry with him following the christening. Personally, if you are not the one doing the shopping and all of the food prep and you get to sleep in an extra 5 hours over what the person who is doing all the work is, maybe you should be grateful enough to not continuously throw a spanner in the works. Not that explaining this did the least bit of good.
    1
  483. 1
  484. The normal process of clinical trials involves a lot of faffing around as tests are run in series rather than in parallel so that investors get maximum value. So they generally go something like this: 1] Someone finds a possible drug in a lab and lots of chemical tests are run to prove that it is a possible drug. The results are presented to investors to get funding for the next stage. 2] Company gets funding for the next stage, they then have to go to the Human Tissue Authority to get tissue culture tests signed off so that they can get their hands on spare human tissues from procedures such as circumcision, abortions, amputations, removed teeth etc. Can be a lot of toing and froing while experimental design is approved by HTA. 3] Tests are performed in tissue culture, this takes time due to its laborious nature. Results are collated and presented to the investors for the next tranch of money. 4] Money comes in and the drug can move into animal testing in rodents to start with, but your experimental design has to be licensed by the Home Office and this takes time. This establishes a lethal dose 50 figure and helps establish dose and establishes effectiveness in an animal model 5] then it can move into primate testing to refine likely dose further and to look for potential adverse reactions, but it all has to be approved by the Home Office and a license given for every stage. 6] Assuming success it will then be back to investors with the results for more money to run human trials and then it will be off to the ethics committees to approve a human trial in healthy humans to establish the safety and side effects of the drug and in the case of a vaccine then antibody titres and epitope specificity would be part of this testing. 7] Assuming the drug looks OK then it is back to the investors and then on to the ethics committee to run a trial in affected patients. In the case of the vaccine it would be to administer the vaccine and then deliberately infect the test subjects to see if it works. All of this usually takes 8-12 years. Time that we do not have. So governments have stepped in and have funded this getting rid of the normal funding rounds. Stages 1-5 have been able to run largely in parallel as ethics committees have been told to allow this stuff to run. The human trials will have been subject to rigorous scrutiny, but the ethics committees will have been told to prioritise the vaccine ahead of any other drugs that are in the pipeline. They have simply dispensed with a lot of the faffing around that goes on with normal drug development.
    1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. If it is not your child then it is probably better to let the mother discipline their own child, but their needs to be a dialogue about boundaries. As a single parent in some ways I am pretty strict, but in others, I am laid back. My son has autism, but I still expect him to be polite and well behaved and do his homework. He hates art lessons, but he is told to show up and not disturb the enjoyment that others have of that lesson. The result is that he is doing OK. The other night he won an award at school for being so positive in the face of his autism and for being so polite and helpful. He has been programming remotely with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and he has been invited to talk about it at their conference at Cambridge University and the Raspberry pi foundation has also asked him to speak, he is only 14. In the 3 years that my son has been at high school, I have been asked to go in twice for bad behaviour. The first time he had behaved badly and he received a complete and utter bollocking from me in front of his teacher. The second time it was far more complex. Some kid had been giving my son a mouthful and my son said "bet you wouldn't come over here and say that". The kid then squared up to my son and punched him, my son stood up for himself and punched the kid back and split his lip. The other kid received no punishment, my child was put in isolation for the day and missed a day's worth of education. On hearing what had gone on, my response was: "Sorry, you expect me to support you in punishing my child when the other child has started all of this verbally by mocking my child's disability and then the other child has been the first to lash out physically at my son, but you are not punishing him but you have punished my son for acting in self-defence by making him miss out on a day's schooling. Actually, I think it is disgusting that this kid was not corrected for the vile taunts he issued to my child in the first place, I also think it is disgusting that no teacher de-escalated this situation before this child assaulted my son, but you see fit to deprive my son of a days education for acting lawfully and proportionately in defending himself. You need to review your discipline policies in this area." The next time my son was picked on by a kid with some serious anger issues. The kid shoulder barged my son aggressively and my son ignored it, the kid then punched my son and my son really laid into him. Fortunately, the whole thing was caught on CCTV and the kid had a final warning and the fact that my son stood up for himself means that this kid has not picked on him since. You see, I have never used physical punishment on my child. Yes, he has been sent to bed without dinner a few times and yes he has missed out on doing things he likes as a punishment when he was younger. My son has been taught by me never to be the first to threaten physical violence, but he has been taught that if anyone hits him on purpose to hit them back HARD and multiple times. I have shadowboxed with him and shown him how to guard his face and look for weak defence and attack. It is fine to be the nice guy in life, it is not fine to be someone else's punchbag.
    1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542.  @NoNoNoMeansNo  I had a planned pregnancy, within marriage. Pregnancy is not exactly compatible with that sort of work, we had, had a number of miscarriages at my workplace so I am assuming that they thought that it is easier to get rid of the employee. My husband walked out before our son was a year old. I hold a degree in biology and an HNC in engineering. They keep on about trying to get more girls doing science, what they forget to mention is that while it is interesting, you do not have a standard day. It is not a case of go in at 9am and leave at 5pm, it was more like arrive at work 7:30am and leave at 5:30-6:30pm. If your equipment went desperately wrong and you could not get it going again, you could go home at 4pm, but you would be stuck at work till 9-10pm the next day. On top of these hours, I used to be on call one week in every four. It was OK at first as we were allowed up to 12 flexi days a year that we could take as half days, but these were negotiated away in exchange for fewer redundancies. So originally if I got called in at say 2am then I would do what I had been called out to do and continue working until noon and then go home and go to bed. The problem was that they changed all that, so for instance if you got a call out at 3:30 am and got to work at 4am and the work took about an hour then you were expected to go home and come back in for 7:30am again and do a full days work, exhausting. The working time directive does not apply to a lot of these workplaces. A few years after I left they changed the working patterns to shift work, they have been fined by health and safety for a number of breaches, so this together with staff retention problems probably prompted the changes. Unfotunately, these sorts of working patterns are not family friendly.
    1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. Some of these things are simple rubbish: 1] I ask people what they do for work to ensure that I am not the only one in the relationship that works and to establish common ground. I am likely to assume that as a guy you're into sports and I have NO interest in sports, so asking that is a non starter. 2] People have tight schedules. You never met a female criminal law solicitor, doctor, surgeon or scientist, our schedules can be tight. When you are ill or in trouble with the law you need someone NOW not in 12 hours time when a standard working day starts. We might work shifts or frequently, as in my case, I used to work long hours and had to do on call work 1 week in 4. 3] Lots of women do not have sex with guys on a first date. Women like some emotional content in the relationship before it moves there and just a few hours is not going to cut it for most women. This also forgets that women menstruate and are often shy about it. 4] Reschedule likewise is not a negative sign, it can just be that something comes up at work that you are expected to pull the rabbit out of the hat. In one job I had the drinking water inspectorate used to come in and the boss would simply say that tomorrow you are all going to be working late and we would be there from 7am to 9pm at least and the following days inspection would be gruelling too. Really you would not have wanted to date me that week. Likewise, ill relatives, my uncle had lung cancer and visiting him each weekend was a 300 mile round trip, now if you really want to drive me there, but I might not be the greatest of company. Sometimes an excuse is valid and true and sometimes it is not, just try to be decent with people.
    1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. I completely agree with you, this video is making out that being gay is a major cause of homelessness. The major cause of homelessness is the affordability of housing. As far as people being homeless due to being gay is concerned, if you live under someone else's roof, you live under their rules, if you don't like it you are at liberty to move out We have all been there it is part of being an adult and taking responsibility for our lives. When I lived at home, my parents [I am straight] objected to my boyfriend, it was either him or the roof over my head, my boyfriend never even so much as stayed at my parents' house. I was a studying A levels at the time and either I wanted to continue studying and living under their roof, the price of which was to pack the boyfriend in or I was going to have to go and get a job. My parents wanted me to study to be a teacher, but after a year on the course, I knew it was not for me and wanted to change course, my parents did not support me in that change and as a result, I started my own business, so that I could afford to do as I wanted in life. What I would say to anyone gay in this situation is: if you are old enough to not be celibate, then you are old enough not to inflict YOUR choice of partner on your parents, you are also old enough to go out and get a job and support yourself. The real root of homelessness is poverty and welfare changes and the gay rights thing is a totally needless distraction from that. As I said, if you live under someone else's roof you live by their rules, most people seem to have forgotten this.
    1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. Certainly identify with the last one. My next-door neighbour is elderly and when her husband started to get feeble, I started to do more and more for her. It started off with me getting shopping in for her and putting her bins out for her. When her husband got worse, I gave her the forms to claim Attendance Allowance and taxied her to the hospital on a number of occasions and when I am using weedkiller on my own front garden I used to do hers too and when I was planting up containers twice a year I would always do one for her. The problem was with doing her shopping on a regular Saturday spot meant that if I needed to drop the shopping early for any reason, I'd have to let her know in advance. Over the years I noticed that she became sarcastic about stuff that we were doing on a Saturday. So we got invited to the Freemason's Christmas do, her response was that it is charity and that they must feel sorry for us and that she wouldn't go if it was her. My 15 year old son has autism and does the sound for a choir, ditto and when he was invited to speak at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology programming she had something critical to say. Well, she has recently crossed the Rubicon. Before the lockdown hit, I told her that, that particular Saturday and the following one were going to be the last weekends that I intended to go to Waitrose, because it is 25 miles away and it is in a more populated area and presented more of a coronavirus risk than shopping locally. She knows that I am severely asthmatic, but still chose to ridicule my decision and she ridiculed my decision to wear facemask and gloves when shopping. Not only that but once the virus did hit, she told 2 other elderly neighbours off for going shopping together, which is something that they have always done and went on to say that if it wasn't for them disobeying lockdown orders, then there was me being ridiculous by wearing PPE and depriving the NHS of it. I will make it clear at this stage, I bought one box of 50 surgical masks back in February which are shared between myself, my son and my parents, they were bought well before there was any mention of PPE shortages. Where we live is very open plan and the neighbours could not be off knowing that I do stuff for her and so they criticised her being nasty about me and she then made out that I don't have any other friends. That could not be further from the truth, but put it this way, I will not be counting her as a friend from now on.
    1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. At the moment I am selling a car because I unexpectedly acquired a second car. The problem is the car I want to be rid of is near its MOT date. The guys at my local garage know that it is being sold for a genuine reason and they know just how much work has been done and its service history. An old guy that runs a funeral business, went to them because his own car needed work and they advised him that his needed some pretty expensive work and told him that mine was for sale at a reasonable price, for its condition. The guy 'phoned me and decided to drop by to see it. He liked the car, but only offered half the asking price based on the fact that it is near its MOT date. He then said he would only buy it if I had it MOTed, at this point, I told him to be on his way. He then 'phoned me on the evening and said that he had booked the car in at my local garage for its MOT, I made it quite clear that I would not be paying for that. This morning at 8am he 'phoned me and said that the car situation was on hold because he was having to go to hospital for a cancer check up. Now whether this is true or not I have no idea. But he asked me to keep the car for him, I think he is playing some sort of game with me and you can bet that he is trying to edge it so close to the MOT date that he can buy it for little or nothing. So straight away, I phoned the garage and told them what had gone on. It turned out that I am not the only person who he gets on the wrong side of. The garage guys are hacked off with him so they are going to do a condition report on my car and rather than charge him directly, they will ramp up the labour charges next time he brings in a funeral hearse. To give you an idea 4 months ago I had a new clutch, dual flywheel mass and 2 new Michelin tyres at a cost of £1,300. I have seen my sort of car, same mileage and age for sale in the £1,400- £1,900 range and mine is for sale for £700, this guy has offered £300 and I accepted and then he started saying he wanted me to pay for an MOT which is £50. The galling thing is, he knows that I am a single parent with a disabled son and he stood there and boasted that it was not about the money because he has £50, 000 in the bank, it was about the value of the car and that he was doing me a favour. Good God if this is this guy's idea of a favour God help us. I have told him that I will keep the car for him till he is able to sort it out, but the reality is that I have no intention of doing that because I think that he is simply trying to take advantage of the situation.
    1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839.  @monicakelloway3953  Sorry to hear that, that is horrible. I completely agree that the murderers get treated better than their victims. I worked for Anglian Water and was in the tearoom watching the traffic on the A14/A1, When past came 2 prison vans with a convoy of police cars and outriders. Turned out it was the multiple murderer Donald Neilson being moved from HMP Whitemoor to Little Hey. From what he had done I knew that he was meant to serve a whole life tarrif in a class A prison, so was surprised to hear of the move. Turns out it was so that they could redecorate his cell. It cost in excess of £40,000 to decorate his cell and move him for a few nights. At the time I was earning £17,400 per year and you can only imagine how hard working people feel about their taxes going to pay for such a thing when we have innocent people die in this country for the lack of NHS funding. Sorry, but if I ran the prison system, it would have been a case of: You want your cell redecorated, well we will wait till their is a free cell and then you will be able to decorate your own cell. There you go ladders, rollers, paint, masking tape; get on with it. Costs about £40. Oh and the 2 prison vans, one was a decoy in case the heavily guarded convoy was attacked. The authorities did a darn sight better job of protecting him than they did his 17 year old hostage. I used to know an ex criminal law barrister, he gave up because he was sick of having to represent the same scum over and over again. Sad that there is so little in the way of years inside to deter some of these people.
    1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856.  @ThereIsOnlyOneStuart  It is extremely scary, as of course I already know what it is like to need emergency treatment through not being able to breath and obviously I assume that if I was to contract it that I would not survive. In many ways though, I am lucky that I live in a rural town, I am able to go out in my garden and in the first wave we were not so badly affected here. Problem is that this has left people complacent. I am guessing that if you know people that have either been very bad or passed away as a result then everyone around them is more careful afterwards, here you do see many people in the street and shops that do not wear masks, People have such a poor understanding of epidemics. They nearly always hit cities and ports first and spread outwards from there. Places like London, which were badly hit during the first wave are now likely to have a much greater population of people that are immune to it and so it is likely to transmit more poorly there than in communities that do not have many immune individuals. People forget that side of the story, so people that you talk to will say it is fine here, it is all in London, Birmingham, Manchester, Cardiff, it is only now that it is starting to spread here and even so people are, 'once the jab is here, we will be fine'. Even my own parents don't really understand that they need 2 doses of that jab for a decent level of protection and that you need a decent percentage of the population to be innoculated to offer protection, because there will be members of the population for which the vaccine is not 100% effective. Today I read that 72% of the BAME population are unlikely to have the jab. So I suspect that a reservoir of the disease will continue to do the rounds in areas with big BAME populations. After innoculations in the rest of the population, then new mutations will emerge from areas of low vaccine uptake and eventually there will be a mutation that will beat the vaccine and we could be back to square one again. How long that would take to happen is anyone's guess.
    1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878.  @69butternut.  Well, precisely. To be fair many people who work do not receive £26K per annum, either before tax or after tax and they may not be entitled to many of the extra benefits that unemployed people are entitled to like: free prescriptions; free dental care; free eye tests; free school meals; council tax; housing benefit; legal aid etc. Unfortunately, my son has autism and my husband walked out. I had to pay him £80K as part of the divorce. I own my own house, but because of my son's disability it has been impossible to work, so I am in receipt of income support. Even before life threw me a curveball or two I had to budget. As a student, I ran my own business. When I worked I was always careful with money, very few of my clothes were not bought in sales at big reductions and everything I had, I made do and mended with until the item was truly past using in some form. The problem is that some people come from backgrounds where worklessness is culturally ingrained. Many have poor planning skills, so, for instance, the guy who wants an exotic animal menagerie, sounds nice, but has he done his homework? How much is the equipment, heating and food going to cost? How much are vets bills for such animals? How much is the insurance going to be in case one of these animals bites a child? Is there a demand for such a service in his area and how much is each animal experience going to yield? Whilst I admire the fact that he is actually doing something, personally, I don't think that he has factored into the equation his own living costs.
    1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. I think that your social situation can have a lot to do with developing crushes. Years ago, I worked for a company where there had been multiple restructurings, people regularly got fired and the bosses were bullies. I was married and so was the guy that I had a crush on. We never took it any further, but we regularly flirted. We were both doing jobs where our skills were underutilised, we worked long hours, we were both on the receiving end of unjust bullying and disciplinaries. The guy was drop dead gorgeous, he was cultured, he spoke a couple of foreign languages, his name was James and his extension number was 007. The first time I had a legitimate reason to speak to him, was when my terminal threw a wobbly. After fixing it, his response was you must call me if you have a problem again, you know my number, don't you..... Er, no? ......Its 007.....hey and I'm Miss Moneypenny......No, more like Pussy Galore....... Really, wasn't she er lesbian, nevermind I am sure you could turn her, phew its hot in here. The reality was that we simply had quite a lot in common. I held an HNC in engineering, he held a degree in engineering, he had studied at Cambridge University, I had worked as a researcher at Cambridge University. We had similar values and a similar sense of humour. We worked in a stressful workplace, for many hours a week and fancying the pants off one another was just a way of making the week a lot more bearable. One day, I came into work to be told that he had, had a road accident and had been cut out of his car and was in hospital, I don't know how I held it together. He recovered and returned to work with pretty much a permanent limp. One day, one of my bullying bosses caught us flirting with one another and he thought that this made me fair game. I tried to explain to him that whilst I cared very deeply about my colleague, that I also loved my husband and would not do anything to break up my marriage or my co-worker's marriage, he tried to blackmail me and I told him whatever he chose to do was between him and his conscious. So he waited till I was at my lab bench in front of everyone in the lab and announced that I was having some sort of relationship with this guy. I blushed and everyone went oo we didn't see that one, so to parry it I started singing Kylie Minogue's I should be so lucky. Of course, I then had everyone going oo-er you fancy James, to which the only response could be well he is drop dead gorgeous and I do not need a trip to Specsavers and to that I added that I was married as is he and the fact that I like him very much is exactly why I would not break his marriage up by having an affair. This did me no harm with my workmates, as they just seemed to think that i was far more honest and decent then some of the bosses. The boss, however, was a different matter. He was angry that he had been knocked back, he was angry that his blackmail had not been effective and he was angry that the result of what he had said in the lab was that we just all had a good laugh about it and in actual fact, it seemed to have made me more popular. He got his own back eventually, by telling a pack of lies about me to get me dismissed. About 6 years later, my James was dismissed too, I know that he must have signed a nondisclosure agreement, because he suddenly no longer wanted to talk to a mutual friend and I. The vile boss, we have reason to believe, that he behaved towards other people similarly and that he eventually got his comeuppance. With regard to crushes, I think if we are honest we are all attracted to a wide range of people and as long as we keep this in proportion it can even be healthy.
    1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900.  @alanwilson2073  Yeah, I had a bullying lying bastard of a boss too. His wife had left him and their daughter, must have been bad for a mother to abandon their child. His mother was the unpaid childminder. That child is now an adult. An adult that has been done for drink driving. She was reported by a witness who saw her car all over the place and saw it park up outside their home. The police called, psycho boss then tried to make out that his daughter had been drinking since she got home. Do I believe him, do I hell after all the lies that he told about me and other people. Neither did the judge and she was banned from driving. Let me put it this way, the darling daughter, whom he described as being the top of the class at everything at 14, left school with very little in the way of qualifications (ain't Linkedin a bitch). The only kind description of her is alternative. She is covered in piercings and tatoos and her hair has been just about every shade of the rainbow, she has had her child out of wedlock, she does not work, she claimed to have borderline personality disorder and she is into all this satanic shit. Lovely! The ex-boss himself, left the workplace a couple of years after me, in mysterious circumstances. I was told by an ex work colleague that the workforce was gathered together and told that there would be a leaving party for him that Friday. Well the final year that I was there he was bemoaning that he would like to leave, but that his pension pot was not big enough to allow him to do this for at least another 10 years, my guess is that he somehow was facing dismissal and chose to jump rather than be pushed, he was not popular with the union, who knew exactly what he was capable of. He went on to do a part-time job at a Costa coffee shop, I am betting that cleaning tables, loading dishwashers and serving coffee are a big come down from being the boss of your own department. It makes me laugh, because when I see reviews of this coffee shop online some people have said how rude and abrupt he is, so he is obviously none too happy in his new job, I just hope Karma comes full circle and he has to work for the sort of boss that he himself was.
    1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973.  Ya Caesareen  The poor, injured passenger in the car that has been hit has got a broken wrist. She has only recently started a job as a care worker and it seems likely that she is going to be absent from work for 8 weeks. This has the potential to result in her losing her job and if this is a zero hours or temporary contract, she may not receive sick pay. Look at the relative disparity between the wealth of a head of state and the sort of wealth accumulated by the average worker. Prince Philip, by all accounts, is in the wrong. He pulled out of a side road onto a 60mph main road, where he did not have the right of way, without being able to see the oncoming traffic, because he claimed he was blinded by the sun. It seems to be pretty cut and dried, that he is at fault and rather then fannying around with his new Range Rover toy that he was lucky enough to receive toute suite, perhaps he should be decent enough to tell his insurer that he was entirely at fault and that he wants all the injured parties to be compensated as quickly as possible, so that their lives are not inconvenienced beyond what is necessary. Many years ago, I lost control of my car as I rounded a corner on a road and hit a patch of ice, I hit a parked vehicle. Fortunately, no one was injured. I went to find the vehicle owner and mortified I explained what had happened, I gave him my insurance details immediately and contacted the insurer myself and was honest with my insurer as to what had happened and asked that they make sure that the matter was dealt with quickly. It was, the other driver got a courtesy car within 24 hours. The insurance was not a cheap brand and yes my premiums went up, but it was a small price to pay for the fact that 1) no one was injured 2) no police were involved as the person whose car I had damaged realised that I was mortified by what was a genuine accident and the fact that I did all that I could to mitigate the effects of the accident went a long way towards them not feeling aggrieved and contacting the police. My accident was one that could have happened to anyone, but had the police been involved then they could have taken the view that I was not driving to the road conditions and I could have been prosecuted. The insurance company did not do too badly out of it either, the other party was so impressed by their service that they changed their insurance to them as well.
    1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981.  @DSan-kl2yc  The problem is that there are a lot of people that simply do not shoulder the responsibility of parenthood, here in the UK there are now an awful lot of children that are in the care of the state and most of them are there because the parents are irresponsible. I was with my husband for over 8 years when I had our son, he wanted a child and then when that was fact and he needed to man up, he started to have an affair, he was gone before his own son's first birthday. He hid £250K in a trust fund and I had to pay him £80K in the divorce. He tried to run me over and the courts still granted him unsupervised contact. Which was eventually revoked because of his behaviour. He stopped paying maintenance and because our son is disabled I had to get it re-established by the courts, his excuse for not paying was that he had remarried and was now paying for 4 step-children that did not even live in the country. Skip forward to December 2015 and the cops showed up on my parent's doorstep asking about my welfare, they could not find me because I have functionally disappeared because my ex had become violent. It turned out that my ex's new wife had bought 2 of her children into the marital home and this had spelt a downturn in their relationship, he had assaulted her and he had been arrested and bailed and they needed to establish my safety. Bail was rescinded because new evidence came to light and he spent Christmas 2015 in jail, she came out of hospital and rescinded her statements and the prosecution was dropped. He is back out there now. I know that he does not pay me what he is supposed to do in child maintenance, because he has had pay raises and promotions, the only times he has ever put the maintenance up was when it went to court and it was not his decision and when he was arrested and he obviously would not want the police to know that he was cheating his disabled child out of money. In the UK you have to pay for family court hearings yourself, even if the judge says the guy is wrong and should be paying more, so unless you know that you stand to gain at least £4K that year it is not worth taking to court because your gains are outweighed by the costs, let alone the stress that it entails. The bastard knows full well that this is the case and he knows that his son's disability means that I cannot work, but he simply is not decent enough to do the right thing. Because of my son's disability, he is good with computers. He is 14 and has been invited to speak at Cambridge University this summer. He also wanted to go on a school trip, but because I had to have a new boiler, I am not able to afford for him to be able to do both, it breaks my heart that he winds up suffering this way, but you can bet that his father never gives a second thought as to how his dishonesty negatively impacts his own son. I would like my son to be able to study until 18, but as yet we do not know if financially this will be a possibility.
    1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. My ex-husband had an affair when our son was 5 months old. I found out when he was 9 months old and we were in relationship counselling. He initially said he wanted to go and by that stage, whilst I wanted him to work on the relationship, I was too worn out to argue. He blamed me for his affair and only stayed because his father persuaded him. He knelt in front of me and begged: 'Please forgive me, I've been a selfish bastard and nothing like this will ever happen again, but I need my space' Well, he wasn't impressed by my lacklustre 'Yeah you're forgiven' reply. He was disappointed that I did not fall over myself over him and started to say how lucky I was that he was giving ME a second chance. At which point I exploded with 'Stay or go. I have got to the stage of really not caring, because you will do what you want, because that is simply what you do. Whatever I try to do or achieve in the home, you are not behind me and you pull in the opposite direction. Just the same as you are turning this around on me now and saying I am lucky that you are giving me a second chance. Right now I do not feel very lucky that I am married to a cheat, so please excuse me if I do not fall over myself to please you. In fact, the person here who has the work to do is you, because you did not respect our marriage enough not to cheat and you totally fail to see that you have a lot of making up to do to regain my trust. You can have your space, because I am going to my parents of Christmas and New Year, it should give you time to work out what you are going to do to repair this relationship' What he did not know, was that I had a keystroke logger installed and found that far from doing anything to try and save our marriage, he was online to the other woman and on dating websites and in chat rooms for people looking to have affairs. I said nothing, but I was not my normal self. Instead of taking his dinner, I would just shout dinner and that was it. He pestered me for sex, but I said no, so he forced matters and then wondered why I just lay there as stiff as a board with my eyes shut. I told him it was just another example of him using me for what he wanted, without any consideration for my feelings. When he complained about what he got for dinner instead of cooking him something else, I just shrugged. He complained that I did not do things that made him happy anymore and I told him that from now on I would reflect the amount of effort that he put into our relationship. I told him that I would love him to do nice things for me like: putting the bins out or doing the washing up, I am not interested in cheap flowers from a roadside garage, practical help would show me that he appreciated my efforts and wanted to make my life easier by taking an active part in our lives. These were all things that he was told in counselling, but he had ignored then and now. He said that I should stop controlling him and I simply said that I was not controlling him, that I had cooked him dinner, that he should think himself lucky that I had made that amount of effort and that he could eat it or not, I was simply indifferent, I had done my duty and it went above and beyond what he ever did. He threw it up the wall. Thankfully he finally left, but he made the divorce hell and his bad behaviour during contact meant that eventually, the courts put a stop to child contact. He remarried and wound up spending time on remand for domestic abuse.
    1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. Rubbish. I am a woman trying to sell a car. I am only selling because my car is too low down for my 80 year old father, the car is advertised at a car workshop, where the guys told everyone that in the past 8 weeks I had replaced the clutch and had 2 brand new Michelin tyres, the cost of this was £1,100. I have priced the car to go at £700, because I already have car number 2 and it is now in my way. A guy who is 25 miles away 'phones up because his mate has been told how reasonably priced the car is, I have seen the same make model and mileage up for £1,400-£1,900. The guy rings up to organise a test drive and I take the car out to meet him. He says he wants the car, but needs to organise with his mate to help him collect the car. He says that he will ring Sunday night and arrange payment and collection. Sunday night has come and gone, it is now Tuesday and nothing. If he did not want the car or has found something that suited him better, it might be polite to let me know rather than keep me hanging. I suspect that as the MOT is up in 3 weeks he thinks that he is going to force the price down further. The reality is that he will get a 'phone call from me tomorrow asking if he still wants the car or not as I need to renew the adverts if not. I have already told him that I have a friend who deals in classic cars on the other side of the country and so if he then tries to drive the price down further, I will tell him that is where it will be going if I do not get a sale in the next 2 weeks, the only reason not to do that is the inconvenience factor. Maybe if he thinks that I have got other options to sell it, he will be more reasonable, it is after all already being sold at lower than its market value and he shook on the deal. Had 2 blokes who tried to rip me off. Bloke 1 says his mate bloke 2 knows all about cars and will test drive it on his behalf. Ok, so bloke 2 has my car in too high a gear for the number of revs he is feeding the engine and is purposely making my engine sound ropey. Now I know there is nothing wrong with the engine and what they have not figured is that not only am I not going to swallow their attempts to swindle me but to drop them at the meet point I have to drive past my garage. So I call their bluff and pull on to the garage and ask the mechanics to give their professional opinion to these blokes. The blokes respond by saying they think the mechanic's opinion is bullshit and that they are prepared to offer £100, because that is all it is worth. I say "my car, your money and if that's all you are offering, I am not selling for that sum". Bloke 2 gets angry and says "You want a reality check love, that's all its worth" To which I tell him that he needs driving lessons to teach him how to drive a shift stick. His face was a picture and the mechanics, who have probably never heard me be quite as assertive had a good laugh. So it is not just women who play retarded games men do to, put it this way, I'd rather take my car to the scrapyard then be ripped off, but it will wind up at a car auction if there are no takers.
    1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. First off, this guy has a daughter and his ex is now a single parent to that daughter, you can bet your bottom dollar that he would expect his ex to put their daughter before any boyfriend. The stuff that he puts on here is therefore completely hypocritical from that viewpoint alone. If an accident were to, unfortunately, befall his daughter. What would he do: go on that dinner date and put his latest squeeze first OR dash to support his daughter in hospital? If the answer is he would go on the dinner date, as a woman, would you really want to go out with him? Let me put it this way, as a woman, when I was single and childless and in my 20s. I had no attraction for single dads, because I knew that if I wanted children, then those children would have to share their dad with another family. Now if I had reached my mid 30s and was still single and wanted children, then that would have been a different matter, it then becomes a numbers game and to be realistic there are going to be a dwindling number of single guys out there who are without children. There is roughly the same number of men out there as there are women and although guys can and do date younger women, because there are roughly equal numbers of men and women the competition is going to be greater. If you are a man that is somewhat past his prime and you have a child somewhere from a previous relationship, then unless you are rich, you are going to be somewhere down the pecking order when it comes to scoring a 20 odd year old hottie with no kids. Why do you think this guy has pheromone soap stacked on the shelves to the right of him? That's right, just like all the women that he berates as past their prime, he is in the same boat and needs all the help he can get LOL. What I will say is that if you are a single guy in his 20s or 30s and you do not have children yourself, I would not advise going out with a single mother. It is difficult when you are not a parent yourself to cope with living in a household with a child that is not biologically yours, at your time of life you still have plenty of options. If however, you are single in your 40s, then your options are closing down, yes you may pull a childless woman in her 30s with a ticking biological clock, but it is probably time to start considering those single mums as dating material. This guy goes on about women not being logical, but the idea that your typical 40 odd year old single father is going to be catnip to 20 year olds is simply delusional.
    1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. The problem is that until recently, the courts allowed perpetrators to have unsupervised access to their children and then the abuser would use that as a pretext to continue the abuse. That is what happened in my divorce ten years ago. My ex had been abusive and I called the police after he tried to run me over, I was only slightly injured and the police did not record it as domestic violence, but as a road traffic accident. During a fact-finding hearing, the Judge described my evidence as an exercise in hyperbole and granted my ex unsupervised access. I told my solicitor about what was going on during the handovers and said that I intended to go to the police about it. He told me not to, as he said that the particular judge would take a dim view and see it as trying to frustrate his orders and as such I could be held in contempt of court and lose residency. He told me just to try to sell up and move as quickly as possible. I had no choice but to take the first offer on my house and go. My ex took it back to court, saying that I was frustrating contact by moving. This time I represented myself, as I knew if needs be I could plead ignorance on the finer points of the law and not being a lawyer, I stood a good chance of getting away with it. The defence that I used was that my ex was being abusive at handovers in front of my son and that moving meant that my parents could handle the handovers thereby lessening the chance of our son seeing this sort of conflict and being distressed by it. The opposition claimed that I was lying, so I proffered video evidence, they immediately tried to stop this being shown by saying that my ex had not consented to the handovers being filmed. I came back with the fact that it was filmed on property that solely belonged to me and that they would show whether or not my evidence was true or fictitious. They came back with some legal argument and I managed to counter that in cases involving children that the overriding concern should be the safety and the welfare of the child. That did it, the footage was viewed and contact was bought to an end. Given the amount of damage this relationship has done to my own life, it does not take much imagination to see that when children are bought up with this as their relationship model this is what they take into life as what a relationship should look like.
    1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. The problem appears to revolve around 'informed consent'. To give this, a patient should be free of any mental condition that could adversely affect their choices. So, in this case, the guy's state of mind may have been in a state of turmoil due to bereavement and a sensible therapist would have explored this possibility and if they had found this they would have then instituted a suitable regime of therapy to thoroughly address his adverse state of mind BEFORE forging ahead with therapies to progress transitioning beyond anything that was entirely reversible. As far as the drugs that he took having unexpected effects: any licensed drugs ALWAYS have a pack insert that spells out any KNOWN side effects of a drug. It is the patient's responsibility to read it and make a decision as to whether the side effects are outweighed by the desired effects, this is also part of the informed consent and is a duty of care of the manufacturer to the consumer. So I am sorry, but I do find that aspect of the story difficult to believe. Not too long ago I was prescribed a drug by my doctor that in conjunction with another drug, prescribed by the same doctor and dispensed by the same pharmacy, could have been fatal. That was a massive oversight on the part of the doctor and to a lesser extent the pharmacy too. The only reason I did not take it was because I always check out any drugs that I take very thoroughly. It will probably come as no surprise that I used to work in a unit manufacturing clinical trials drugs and even those drugs have inserts outlining any known reactions. One of our drugs was pioneered for rheumatoid arthritis, it was no better than drugs that were already on the market so it was then trialled with patients with leukaemia, who had already had a failed bone marrow transplant with the standard drugs. We had 2 patients die in trials, one of which the relatives started to raise concerns with regard to informed consent. The reality was that the patient having failed the standard treatment, was really drinking in last chance saloon. He made a rational decision to try an experimental treatment because it was his only chance of survival, it was just sad that his bid for life failed, but as a researcher, myself and the team took heart from the number of people that survived due to our treatment, which I can only say that the benefits massively outweighed the risks in those scenarios. With transitioning, there are MASSIVE ethical dilemmas to consider, mainly because you are not treating a physical illness and in aiding someone to transition the risk of doing more harm then good is huge and not completely reversible. Therefore ANY good doctor should be absolutely sure that his patients wishes to do this are not the result of some transient desire or an aspect of some mental illness. I am not in this area of work, but even as an outsider looking in, I would consider it essential to discuss what could go wrong with hormone therapy and what could go wrong with surgery. I would be looking to outlining the whole process in very fine detail and I would also be looking at the availability of figures with regards to the transitioned genitalia's functioning, can erections be produced and maintained, how about sensitivity and arousal. How does the patient feel about their loss of fertility, will they want to be putting sperm or ova on ice so they have the potential to have their own biological children. What does this mean for relationships? For someone who is trans maybe you think that such thoughts are transphobic, but the reality is that most people will see these issues from a cis standpoint, quite simply because the majority of people out there are cis. So for example, I now live in a small community, there is a born woman who is in a lesbian relationship and he is currently in the process of transitioning to male. He is still in a relationship with his partner who he had a lesbian relationship. I don't mean to be unkind, but how the hell does that work; if his partner is lesbian and only attracted to women, how is that same person still going to be attracted to a partner that is now a man? I know that some women are attracted to butch women and I know that some lesbian women are into dildos, but an awful lot are not into anything remotely male. It is of course absolutely none of my business, but it is the business of the 2 people involved and it should be the business of any psychotherapist that is treating this person.
    1
  1054.  @andrewboote5726  It is a shame that the reports of the number of people regretting/not regretting transitioning are not made public. There needs to be more open and honest discussion around such issues to increase understanding and hopefully decrease aggravation between trans and non-trans people. As far as saying an individual is transphobic for not sleeping with a transgender individual, that is frankly nuts. Human attraction by its very nature is discriminatory. It makes as much sense as me saying that a gay man refusing to sleep with me {I am a straight female} is heterophobic. No one can help who they are and are not attracted to, that is just the way that we are ALL made. Unfortunately, there are some individuals within the trans community that are their own worst enemy. Surely the goal of being trans should be total transition and acceptance as an individual of your chosen gender, the trouble is that there are always going to be some areas where full transition is not going to be easy. I am specifically thinking of male to female transitions who go on to compete in sporting contests as female. Now in other situations I have no problem with accepting someone who is fully transitioned, but within sport, that is a different matter when a lifetime of male genes and hormones have given a massive advantage over their fellow women competitors. Why on earth do they not campaign for a separate sports classification and compete against each other? The trouble is that these guys greatest allies should be other women and sadly they are sabotaging this with a lack of common sense.
    1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. OK some of what this guy is saying is untrue and anyone that plays games male or female is a narcissist. 1] When a woman is saying you are moving too fast, she is saying 'please value me as something above merely being an object for your pleasure'. Society says that if a woman jumps into bed right away with a man then she is a slut, a slag or a whore. If you are a gentleman would you want your woman's reputation to be damaged, if you could not care less then do women that do not want every one saying this a favour and move on to the type of slut you want. 2] Let's be friends, that is fine it means that you can have as many women as you like, because all you are is friends. I am female and I have had loads of male friends in the past and I do things for them, made birthday cakes and outfits for their kids and got flowers and presents for their girlfriends and partners and they do stuff back for me, tyre changes and that sort of thing. 3] Sarcasm,well sometimes it can be well deserved when there is no other way of communicating with a guy who is not respecting our personal boundaries. 4] If we are saying that a guy has got back in touch it is so that you do not hear it from anyone else and think that we are having some sort of affair. 5] Women wear make up because that is what is expected of us, perfectly happy not to wear make up, unless going to work where it is going to be expected. 6] A relationship is about 2 people and if she does not have kids then she can work just as well as you can, but in many instances women earn less than men so in that case you may need to pay a little more than your fair share. He says take care of her children they are his children too, if not then their biological father should be paying for them. If they are your children man up and pay for them and she can get on with the feeding and nappy changing. 7] With regard to texting my rules are simple don't text me when I am work unless it is urgent: you are ill and have been admitted to hospital or a parent, child or sibling is critical or dead, anything else tell me when I get home and as long as I have not gone to bed then I will reply promptly. 8] If someone is saying that you are not spending enough time then a compromise needs to be made. Your or her job, education etc, should never suffer, but you should and she should expect to make reasonable sacrifices. So the weekly guys or girls night out might have to move to being a monthly event. Relationships need work to work and if the person is not there for mutual fun and support, what sort of relationship have you really got at the end of the day? Nothing can go all in one direction there has to be reasonable compromise or one person or the other IS going to get pissed off and dump the other. 9] You need to know whether you have an exclusive relationship with someone or whether this is something far more casual. If you are saying that someone does not want to hang out with you, that is your cue that they are not that into you, they have better options than you and you should be looking out for better options than her is the simple advice, but if you have been refusing to devote any time to her [8] then she is just mirroring your behaviour back to you and it serves you right. 10] If she switches the plans and wants you to spend more money, simple answer, " I'm a bit short this month, so we we'll have to go Dutch on that one, I can just about manage Starbucks". She may genuinely have been busy that day and not had any lunch, if that is the case she won't have a problem with this approach.
    1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084.  @PistonAvatarGuy  I was married for a number of years when I had my son and my ex started an affair when he was 5 months old, finally walking out when our son was 10 months old. His behaviour leading up to the divorce was very bad and during the divorce he hid £250,000 and I had to pay him £80,000. He did rather nicely and I was the one left holding the baby. He was eventually awarded unsupervised contact and used the handovers to be abusive. In addition to that he would frequently just not show up for his son. He would then show up for next contact and boast about what he made out to be some sort of beauty queen that he had supposedly bedded and how much better that she was then me. When the reply was: 'I don't regard it as any of my business what you do with whom', his attitude was that I was jealous. 'Sorry, jealous of what, a woman that has a relationship with a guy that is unfaithful. I say good luck to her, 'cause she is going to need it' He showed up repeatedly and said this sort of crap. We then had: 'You are jealous because you don't have anyone'. To which the reply was: 'How do you know whether or not I choose to have any one and I am no longer your wife, so it is none of your business'. Still does not take the hint that I am not bothered and still we have the random no shows for contact. The next time that he is a no show we get into an argument, he thinks that child contact is for him, whereas I believe child contact is primarily for the benefit of the child and I feel that dicking his son around like this is wrong. Eventually, I lose my rag and tell him that 12 days every fortnight he has no child caring responsibilities and that he can do what he likes then, but the 2 days when he has contact, he could at least put his son before some random slut. Which of course, rather than pulling him up sharp starts him off. I tell my solicitor who fires a shot across his bows by informing him that if he continues to fail to show up that I can return it to court and get the contact order changed. He still plays up and my solicitor suggests taking it back to court, but by this stage I have had enough and I am moving away to be close to my parents so that they can handle the handovers. Of course he takes it all back to court, only by then I had solid proof of his behaviour and the court put a stop to contact. He then messed about even more with child support. Women don't force men to have children either. If you don't want kids YOU HAVE AS MUCH CHOICE AS THE WOMAN to not have sex, to use a condom or to have a vasectomy.
    1
  1085.  @PistonAvatarGuy  I am aware that condoms break, but I do not feel that birth control pills are any more effective, they too have a failure rate. Taking antibiotics interferes with their absorption, as does all too common stomach upsets. The pill was reformulated in the 80s because of concerns about its links to cancer and it now contains much less of the active hormones that prevent pregnancy, this means that just taking the pill as little as an hour late at the start of a pack can massively reduce its effectiveness. With regards to condoms in the UK, they have to meet a certain standard. Every single one of them here is applied to a metal phallus shape and run through a bath and electrical conductivity is tested. Being rubber this is an insulator so if current is detected the affected condom is rejected, additionally there are random pressure control tests run on every batch. The selected condoms from a batch are filled with air to a certain pressure and if they burst then the whole batch is rejected. One of my mates [excuse the pun!] used to work in quality control at Durex and they used to test condoms that had failed in use too! He said that most of the condoms that had failed had no discernible defect in their materials and that they had either been torn by snagging on rings or fingernails or had not been stored in the correct manner or the guy had neglected to expel the air from the tip before putting it on. It is a valid point that it is the woman that chooses to keep a child and that is all the more reason to take care of contraception from the male point of view and it is quite easy to couch it in terms of simply being protective in your relationship; because to be fair whilst men and women do pay a price for unwanted children, the ones that pay the biggest price are the children themselves.
    1
  1086.  @PistonAvatarGuy  Women are held accountable in the sense that they are often the ones left holding the baby. Most normal women are absolutely besotted with their baby and would do anything to hold on to their child. Women that give up their children are generally looked down upon. Yes there are some women who simply do not have any better options in life then to have kids and there are other women, like me that give up their career to have kids, that have worked hard to finance having a child. If my ex had been decent our son would have had a wonderful quality of life, but he was not, even when his son was diagnosed with developmental difficulties, it has been me that has shown up to all the appointments and assessments and carried out all of the therapeutic regimes. It has been me that has got him what he has needed in life. My ex might as well be 6 foot under because the only help we receive from him is what he is legally obliged to pay and I am sure that he is not paying the right amount either. Don't be too quick to assume that looking after a kid full time is always easy, it is not. My son was diagnosed with autism at age 7 and I have looked after him single handedly since he was 10 months old, he is now 15, all the work started to pay off last year when he was invited to speak at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's European programming conference at Cambridge University. My ex knew all about his son's diagnosis, but he still saw fit to stop paying child support, which forced us to spend money using the courts to get it re-established, he seemed to think that it was possible to have a disabled kid and be able to work, it isn't because care costs outweigh income. If a woman is the one looking after her child then she is accountable, she is spending time that she could be earning money bringing up a man's child. This allows the man to work and if he is paying for his child then he is being accountable too. Better still if he is taking an active part in his child's life by showing up for child contact reliably and attending things like school sports day, parent's evenings etc. But sadly not everyone wants to do that and worse still there are women that disrupt that relationship with no good reason.
    1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. Women do not get free representation unless they do not own property. It costs in the region of £12K to get a non molestation order. When my ex tried to run me over the police did not record it as the domestic violence that it was, they recorded it as a road traffic accident. The marriage guidance therapist we went to would not act as a witness either, despite the fact that he had admitted being violent to me. When it came to child contact apart from records of my ex viewing violent porn it was my word against his, that he was violent and volatile. The judge said that my evidence was an exercise in hyperbole. My ex used child contact handovers to continue his abuse. I recorded it with a hidden camera and showed my solicitor and told him that I intended to contact the police with regards to it. My solicitor told me that if I did so, then the judge would see it as trying to frustrate the contact order and that I could be held in contempt of court. He advised that I should sell my house as soon as possible and move to my parents so that they could handle the handovers and then he really would have no excuse for his behaviour. Not that he had any real excuse in the first place, it was he who left me for his mistress and I was grateful for that and only too happy to divorce him (it did not work out with her, either) I moved and he dragged me back through the courts saying that the move was designed to frustrate contact. This time I had run out of money, so I represented myself. I told the assembled magistrates that I had moved as he was violent and abusive to me when he picked up our son and that I hoped my parents doing the handovers might take the heat out of the situation. His solicitors claimed that my assertions of violence were false, so I offered up the covertly filmed evidence, they tried to claim that the evidence was inadmissible, so I used the law to argue that regardless of how it was obtained, he had come on to property that was solely mine, that he had been violent against me and that this was being witnessed by and adversely affecting our son. The evidence was seen and the comment made by one of the magistrates was that it was disgusting. They could not overturn the original contact order, but they issued a section 7 order, which means he cannot have contact without a full social services assessment, which we knew he would not pass. That was back in 2010. The ex apparently married a foreign lady in 2012, she had 4 children, none of them his they continued to live with their maternal grandmother. In June 2015 two of them came to live with my ex and their mother. Things started to unravel. The police turned up on my parent's doorstep in December 2015, enquiring about my welfare. My parents 'phoned me and I was told to contact the police force where my ex lived. He had been arrested and remanded in prison for attacking wife number 2. He only got away with it because she came out of hospital three weeks later and rescinded her statement and being foreign she fled. If anyone is accused of a criminal offence they get free representation anyway. So as DV is a criminal offence men are represented and whilst the man himself cannot cross-examine, their solicitor is pretty expert at doing that job, trust me. Even in the divorce courts, there is cross-examination and there seems to be a pretty high level of proof required. Anyone who simply lives with someone who is controlling would probably find it very difficult to prove that, because controlling people do not allow their partners the sort of technology to record their abuse.
    1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147.  @whozaskin3639  He is within his rights to expect to have a good meal on the table, his laundry done, the marital home kept clean and his children cared for. Sex should be about nurturing and maintaining a relationship and it is the responsibility of BOTH parties to make sure that, that happens. What often happens when a child comes along, is that the mother is physically overwhelmed and stressed and the guy fails to recognise this and pitch in a little. Sex is not great for a woman soon after childbirth and so when you add in disturbed nights, leaky boobs, stretch marks and not feeling that sexy because of the hormonal disruption a woman's body is going through, you find that sex changes from being a fun activity to being yet another chore and so it drops off the menu. The problem is the longer it goes the more entrenched that it can become. If you try and force matters your partner will resent you. This is a problem that has to be approached with a level of care. For God's sake do not criticise your partners: weight gain or stretch marks, she will already be self-conscious of them and this will affect her confidence. Reassure your partner that you still find her attractive. Pitch in with a few jobs. Organise a date night at home tell her when it will be and that you will be sorting out dinner. Leave work early that night, pick up a takeaway, don't overstuff her with food or she is less likely to fancy any action. If she looks frazzled when you have eaten offer to run her a bath. If not then skip straight to the massage, tell her that you want her to relax and enjoy and that there is no expectation on her. Massage her ALL over BUT go easy on the breasts and nipples, these might be sensitised and go easy on the genitals too, especially if she has had any tears or stitches or if there is any swelling. Monitor to see that she is enjoying what you are doing and if she asks you to stop, then move on to another area right away. Do not do this with an expectation of sex, do it because it maintains intimacy, you might find that you arouse her and that your luck is in. Make it a regular weekly date night and you will find that sex will come back on the agenda. This is a recognised sex therapy technique based upon sensate focusing. You are bringing her focus back to her body and the pleasure that it can potentially give her and your treatment of her will reassure her that you still love her and find her attractive. As for loyalty, well I am sure you have a pair of hands and a bit of self-pleasuring really does not count as cheating and if it makes you feel better, just remember that as guys age they frequently get erectile dysfunction, wouldn't you want your partner to be sympathetic if you failed to rise to the occasion sometimes?
    1
  1148.  @whozaskin3639  OK firstly I don't know where you live, but in the UK circumcision is not done routinely on little boys. Outside of Jews and Muslims the only other cases where it is done is where the foreskin is too tight. ED is usually either psychosexual or a complication of diabetes or poor veins. The idea that I talked about here is to reconnect the woman with her own body and to reassure her that you still love her and find her attractive. The sensate focusing method does work and part of that is also taking your foot off the gas when it comes to sex. I have no idea if you have ever been present whilst a partner gives birth, but it is pretty dramatic and so are the changes wrought upon that woman's body. Your woman probably does not even feel particularly confident about being naked after going through that, she may even be frightened about falling pregnant again or frightened that sex will hurt, particularly if she has torn or had to have the perianal area cut. By feeling loved and not pressured then she will become more relaxed and confident, which is a good precursor to being turned on and therefore to sex. Good sex is infinitely better than bad sex, the last thing you really want is a situation where your woman simply endures sex as a duty to you. Duty quickly conflates with chore and really sex is an arena where the last thing you want your partner to think of it as is a chore. The reality is that sex is way better and way more rewarding for everyone if everyone is into it. With regard to jacking off, all I am saying is that sure I realise that you have needs and in the short term till your partner is back up to speed it is a perfectly valid form of sexual expression. I don't know how much you know about childbirth, but generally, penetrative sex is unusual for the first 4-6 weeks postpartum, partly because the woman is usually still bleeding during this time and partly due to exhaustion from giving birth and night feeds, newborns feed every 2 hours. Your previous sexual frequency will probably not re-establish for 6-12 months. You might fin tantra a good resource.
    1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155.  @misschief4283  Quite clearly, you have never studied or worked for Cambridge University. You absolutely do not stab them in the back by bringing the university into disrepute. Going to the police would be deemed just that. University has proctors that uphold the university's laws as determined by the university equivalent of parliament, the Senate House. The standard of proof is the criminal standard of proof ie 'beyond reasonable doubt' rather than the civil law standard of proof 'on the balance of probability' Both students and employees are permitted representation through recognised unions. As for trained, they have no shortage of law experts themselves. As I am sure you are aware many incidents of bad behaviour happen in private and as such that can make them very difficult to prove, either as an in-house case or within the law courts. In this incident, the university upheld the complaint as there were texts sent from the perpetrator's 'phone to the complanent's 'phone. Despite upholding the complaint the university failed to impliment a suitable solution that would keep the two apart without detrimenting the victim. I am not excusing the university, but the vast majority of complaints that it deals with would not meet the evidential threshold that is set by the Crown Prosecution Service and in those sorts of cases the most that the police can do is issue a caution, most people are aware that you can refuse to accept a caution and so if the person does this, they walk off without any criminal record whatsoever. Unfortunately, that is the way that it is, the law sadly, does not always punish those that do wrong and to be fair, if you ever are involved in a criminal trial, it is a very draining and long process.
    1
  1156.  @misschief4283  Actually, I did work for them and I am not sure how you think I have contradicted myself. A lot of what goes on there is not ideal. Your question asks, why are they handling these issues internally. The reality is that it is about reputation and damage limitation , as far as they are concerned. It is not great for them if you students or staff involve the police and matters come out in open court, because whilst the victim of sexual assaults and rapes would be anonymous, the perpetrator would be revealed as a member of the university. In this case as it is harassment, she probably would not be anonymous. You perhaps think that there is a conflict when I said beyond reasonable doubt and then said about the evidential standards of the CPS. Well sorry, but the CPS can be a law unto themselves too. They are at least partially funded by the taxpayer, so they are obliged to only take forward cases that they feel confident in getting a conviction in. It constantly remains a mystery as to why they drop many of the cases. Sometimes I wonder if it is simple overload. The police are frequently frustrated as to the number of cases that get dropped. The reality in this case is that whilst the perpetrators texts and attention were unwelcome, if they simply consisted of nothing more than sexual innuendo, then the CPS may take the view that this is too low down the criminal scale to bother. I have personally had experience of this as my ex tried to run me over and nothing came of the police investigations, he did not get so much as a caution. He went on to attack wife number 2 and he was charged with the offence and initially bailed, when new evidence came to light and he was remanded in custody. Wife number 2 then rescinded her statement and the CPS did not carry it forward, despite the fact that they are supposed to do that in cases of domestic violence. I can only assume that she was frightened into taking this course of action.
    1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208.  @alexparise2321  That is the thing that most guys do not realise. They have far more options than women. Women are tied more to biological aging than men and have a very finite time to achieve stuff in. If a woman in the UK studies for a degree then she is going to be 21/22 by the time her education is finished and she is going to graduate with a bunch of debts hanging over her head. She then has to balance that debt and her career and having kids. This is why many, many young women are resorting to hooking up with sugar daddies. It is essentially a form of prostitution the girl is offering companionship, dates, sex a girlfriend experience in exchange for her tuition fees or rent being paid or expensive gifts: a car; jewellery; designer handbags that she can sell. If the gifts dry up so does the 'relationship'. I am not saying that this transaction might not result in a genuine relationship eventually, but that is not the premise that it has started out on and I would say that it is a risky strategy for a guy to follow this path in the expectation that it is going to result in a relationship. If a guy joins a sugar daddy site as this guy did, they know what they are letting themselves in for. They are buying someone's services with gifts. The first woman that he mentioned was decent and up front about it, she had told him that if there was sexual chemistry between them, it would happen, but that he would be paying for it. He does not have clear objectives, he wants a relationship, but only when it suits him, so yeah he is going to find it difficult to get someone that will go weeks or months without seeing the person that they are supposed to love, unless there is some sort of big pay off that makes that sort of trade off acceptable.
    1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1