Comments by "Sormina Saragih" (@SorminaESar) on "Near-Collision Between Chinese, Philippine Ships in South China Sea | WSJ" video.

  1. China is the permanent seat of the United Nations (UN). One of the regulation of UN is UNCLOS 1982, Philippines, Malaysia, India, and Indonesia have adopted UNCLOS 1982. So if China didn't recoqnise UNCLOS 1982, all of ASEAN will submit to the UN so China will withdrawl the permanent seat of UN. More sanctions
    16
  2. @@wei_ke I just want to confirm China, is China adopt it? Give me simple answer
    6
  3. @@wei_ke I've told you that China had been signed and ratified UNCLOS 1982 and I've no objection at all about it. But China doesn't adopt UNCLOS 1982 as the rule of law on China. So what's basic legal of China to claim that Taiwan and a part of territorial souvereignty of Philippines as a part of China's territorial souvereignty. No legal basic at all cause no legal basic at all based in China's domestic law. When China have been signed and ratified UNCLOS 1982, it isn't automatically China have been adopted it as a rule of law on China. China must be adopted and make it to the rule of law on China. Do you understand it? It's international law. As a permanent seat member of Security Council the United National, China must be obedient to the treaty as one of International Law sources. Making of the China's map by your self, it means like China isn't obedient and like be above the international law.
    6
  4. @@wei_ke 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣you don't understand the difference between ratification and adoption, you don't know anything of international law and how do you take it about GDP, export and import law, and you've never mentioned of acts of China about UNCLOS 1982, all of your comments are build by your thinking without legal basic and you don't know that Indonesia have been win the conflict of North Natuna Island by international arbitrage. Do you know just a little about arbitrage
    5
  5. @@wei_ke it seems you don't understand the difference's between signed and adopted. I know that China have been signed UNCLOS 1982. It means China has been ratification. It's law terminology but I don't know if China have been adopted UNCLOS 1982 to the rule of law of China. Many countries have been ratification but it's not automatically it will be adopted. So I want to confirm you again, do you think China have been adopted UNCLOS 1982 as the national rule of law
    4
  6. @@wei_ke No. It means you're very big mistake and I think you didn't know about the law at all. China, indeed doesn't care of international law cause China isn't democracy country. If the country is democracy, it means the country recoqnize the legitimacy of the law authority is aboveof any power of government. When you answered me like that I predicted that China doesn't adopted it to the national of rule of law. There're several sources of International Law: 1 treaties; 2 international customs; 3 general widely recoqnized; 4 principles of law; 5 the decisions of national and lower courts; and 6 scholarby writings. UNCLOS is standing of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The new of UNCLOS is UNCLOS 1982. UNCLOS's one of sources of international law, treaty or the most popular terminology is agreement. UNCLOS will have authority if the countries have been signed and adopted to the national rule of law. I'm Indonesian and I studied at Faculty of Law. There was a subject of International Law at Faculty of Law. Indonesia have been signed, ratification and adopted UNCLOS 1982 to the Indonesia rule of law as it' mentioned in Acts of Fisheries and Marine No. 32/2014 and derifative of it. There's general principle of international law that lex specialis derogat legi lex generali. It means that UNCLOS 1982 have been effected of Indonesia. It's legal basic of Indonesia to declare and claim about Indonesia's territorial souvereignty, and UN recoqnize it as a part of territorial souvereignty of Indonesia de facto and de yure. Based on Part II, " Territorial Sea and Contigious Zone from Article 2 until 15 , and then Article 48 say that measurement of the breadth of the territorial sea, the contigous zone, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf. Does China recoqnize and adopt it?
    4
  7. @@wei_ke UNCLOS is international treaty, and of course it's law. UNCLOS indeed manage and arrange of maritime borders, territorial of sea and another include economic exclusive zone. UNCLOS is lex general. To efected it, each country must be adopted to the rule of law of national, and then you apply UNCLOS into your national law and count your border maritime with the rule of UNCLOS, and then you declare it as your territorial souvereignty. There're several terms and conditions to be a country according to international law: 1 peoples/Folks; 2 souvereign territorial; 3 souvereign government; 4 recoqnition or confession, de facto and de yure. China's speech that the map of China based on China historical long time ago. But according to the terms and conditions as a country is mentioned that souvereign territorial and recoqnition de fact and de yure. Okay? The potition of Taiwan and Philippines are out of the China and the facts that there're peoples live overthere declare and claim that they're not China and many countries arround the world except China have been recoqnized it, no objection at all. It's fact finding. Taiwan and Phillipines as countries have been signed and adopted UNCLOS to be the rule of law each other, so they claim it's as territorial souvereinty. It's de yure. So what the legal basic of international law to be right of China's claimed. Imagine that many countries arround the world claim that Guanzhou, Fuzhou, Xiamen, Ningbo, and Shandong are a part of their territorial souvereignty based on hiatorically and also they have been making a map to prove their claim. Don't you think the world will be chaos and so messy? China didn't adopt UNCLOS 1982 as China's rule of law so no legal reason to allow China's claim. It's lex specialis
    4
  8. @@wei_ke you said that China had been signed UNCLOS 1982 and I've no objection at all about it. And you claim Taiwan and Phillipines as parts of China's territorial souvereignty, and I ask you what the legal basic of your claim, you answer that the historical of China. Many countries arround the world would have historical and making the map like China and then claim that the parts of territorial of China are belonging of them. The UN make the general rule of law to claim as a territorial souvereignty as UNCLOS. China signed it, but China didn't adopt UNCLOS to the rule of law on China. And then China claim Taiwan and Philippines, but Taiwan, Phillipines and another countries declared that UNCLOS 1982 have adopted by the rule of law each countries like Indonesia has been adopted UNCLOS 1982 by Acts of Fisheries and Marine No. 32/2014 the new of acts. Based on Article 48 UNCLOS 1982 is called that Measurement of the breadth of the territorial sea, the contigous zone, the exclusive economic zone and continental state and the acts of Fisheries and Marine No. 32/2014 Indonesia has exclusive economic zone (EEZ) as legal basic of Indonesia's claim as territorial of sea souvereignty, sorry cause I apply it to Indonesia cause it's my country, it's legal and valid. But China claimed that North Natuna Island as territorial souvereignty, so what's the legal basic of China's claim? Based on the map of made of China. Claim of China is illegal and illegitimate cause no legal basic at all, except China mention the acts of China's law had been adopted of UNCLOS 1982. Therefore, there's conflict of border between one country and another. But if China stay with China's claim so many countries arround the world will report it to Security Council United Nations so China's member of permanent seat of Security Council withdrawl and give China more sanctions like Cuba, Iran, North Korea and Russia. Enough!
    4
  9. @@wei_ke oh comon, please recheque my question, does China adopt UNCLOS 1982? So please answer with simple word, yes or not, and then we will go on to the next explanations
    3
  10. What do you mean? Could you mind explanationing
    2
  11. @@wei_ke It's so difficult to discuss about international law when you've no qualification of law at all. You've never know well about the difference between sign and adopt cause it's international law. But many expert of international law arround the world will understand my explanations. It's 💯% right and no doubt it. Cause you've no classification of law at all, you don't try for searching geogle to recheque my explanation. But if you understand it, you can mention the acts of China have been adopted UNCLOS. Meanwhile, I can mention the acts of Indonesia have been adopted UNCLOS so Indonesia recoqnize economic exclusive zone in Indonesia. UNCLOS is international treaty so need adopt UNCLOS into the national rule of law to be effected it. There's simple example for us, can you ever adopt a child? To make a child to be our family must be fulfilled a rule of law of our country and then registered to our family identity. Noted, China isn't democracy country. According to the expert of law, A.V Dicey said that one of characteristic of democracy state is supremacy of law. So my presumption that China's no rule of law or it'll be called as above the law
    2
  12. China will take over Philippines after Taiwan?😂😂😂😂😂are you kidding? How do you know?
    2
  13.  @hbr968  exactly
    2