Comments by "oneoflokis" (@oneoflokis) on "KernowDamo"
channel.
-
494
-
193
-
135
-
122
-
113
-
109
-
97
-
88
-
83
-
79
-
76
-
58
-
57
-
55
-
52
-
52
-
43
-
42
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
Right on, Damo! I'm sorry the Green Party and their candidate in Rochdale appear to have messed up. However, this does now leave the way clear for a Galloway victory! And speaking for myself, I wish the man all the best. (He has spirit, which is important. Also showmanship, which is probably why some don't like him, but it helps you win in politics!)
For even those who don't like the old bruiser (and bruiser he is, verbally at least - and again that's what we want right now!) the enormous deficiencies of Starmer and his Labour party mean that a Galloway win, and his lnocking 'em left and right in Parliament, will be firstly, a strong possibility, and secondly, a very heartening sight! ๐๐ค
So, for such a result I shall pray, seeing as I also live in Cornwall and cannot vote in Rochdale. ๐
32
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
There is already a heavy tax on the poor, the disabled and people on benefits, Damo. It's called VAT (& in my view it should be called ๐ฉ.) ๐
You know, I don't think the Tories are going to do this. I don't think they're going to have the time before the next election, nor will they dare impose this on any sections of the electorate, as they are already so unpopular. So much so, that I don't think that there is a chance of them getting in next year. What we are all hoping for, of course: is a hung parliament (that can do nothing - prolly the best thing at the moment ๐) or a small Labour majority, with Sir Kid Starver having his arm twisted right up his back, by the SNP and the Greens! ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ๐๐
It surprises me NOT IN THE LEAST, that benefit UNDERCLAIMING DWARFS "benefit fraud", and that both of those put together in turn are dwarfed by tax evasion: the larger figure of tax evasion being come up with by charities with an interest in the matter, who know all the tricks that all these companies and Tory grandees are basically using to cheat the Exchequer... Totes unsurprised!! ๐
(They'd better not come after my PIP, certainly. I only got it this year. ๐ก)
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
That's PRECISELY what I was thinking, Damo! ๐๐โค Re Starmer's parents, for one thing. Jobs in the 1960s and 1970s were plentiful, but not always well paid. However, both Mr and Mrs Starmer seem to have had excellent jobs, for the time! A nurse (depending on the level) was always reasonably well paid; and as for a "toolmaker", whether or not his dad "owned the factory", I have read on the internet that it was a very skilled job, and paid somewhat on a par with, sometimes more, than a solicitor! Added to that the fact that at the time, married women with children did not often work (and rents and all that reflected that, so did mortgages), this highly skilled two income family would have been in a VERY advantageous position, for the times! ๐
Same goes for Sunak. A pharmacy was a very tidy little business. Then and now (though now, they tend to cash out by selling out to chains.) Him and his "Sky TV"! ๐
And didn't Starmer go to some kind of private/selective grammar school? BAH! ๐๐
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes: major props to John Trickett. But I think it's hard cheese, not to count the 7 Labour MPs who have already had the whip removed over the 2-child benefit cap, as Labour MPs. They are, aren't they? Because their constituents elected them as such. Kid Starver Granny Freezer Pensioner Killer may wish to get rid of them, but he can't outside of a byelection or a GE. So - don't they count as Labour rebels too? ๐
Anyway. Tons of newspapers, such as the Independent and even tne Daily Express, say that Starmer has endured a massive rebellion, due to the 50-odd of his MPs who abstained. Of course, 50 No votes would have been even better, because he couldn't have withdrawn the whip from that many! ๐
(I don't believe in a "whipping system" at all, btw. It undermines democracy because it makes MPs betray their constituents. ๐)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bestcomsystems4458ย OK. So you've defined your terms.
By "politically interested people", I think I mean more or less what the YouTuber Michael Lambert means. Ie, not people who are fascinated by political parties; maybe people who have voted or considered voting for different political parties throughout their lives; people who understand and are prepared to research the issues, as well as various politicians ' attitudes towards them, so that they the voters can make a rational choice. NOT, on the other hand, people (Lambert alludes to them) who think that politics and elections are just another form of entertainment, who aren't prepared to seriously engage; and who are guided by impressions: such as, Isn't Boris such a lovely funny entertaining bloke, he can't mean any harm, I'll vote for him! ๐
You'd also be surprised how many younger middleaged people I've seen in pubs and cafรฉs reading tabloid newspapers. Also, tons of younger people read the Mail Online for the celebrity gossip. And then there's the BBC - most people still get their news from the TV - which is now not at all impartial. So.
And Kernow Damo's channel is not at all uninformed!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes: I think that you are right, Damo. The story of the sub, although obviously newsworthy, is I think being treated as something of a distraction. And no, the media don't seem to care about drownings of migrants: not even 100 migrants children. It is disgusting. ๐คฎ
And I take on board about what you have said about the greedy capitalist submarine company cutting corners, in order tp descend to such depths (in so many ways! ๐) without the safeguard of safety testing and even keeping to known safety limits.
And about the ill-advisedness even of the submarines name, "Titan"! (You see, a neopagan (such as myself) would never consider embarking in such a thing with such a name; because of the obvious hubris of it: and the likelihood of attracting negative synchronicity with such an ill-omened name. ๐)
When I first heard this story on the news a couple of days ago, I will admit that my first reaction was a cynical "meh". However, I now do recognise that whatever the outcome, the stricken sub or its wreck MUST be found. It's akin to locating wreckage and black boxes from air disasters; professionals have to find and analyse it all so as to avoid future disasters.
Also what you were saying about rescue at such depths being impossible.. Well, not exactly. If the exploration company had had another backup submarine (which they haven't) it could have sent down its backup immediately to locate the other sub: and then (apparently they have armlike devices) to dislodge the stuck sub and/or grab it and tow it to the surface. Might help for the subs to have built-in towing hooks! ๐
But since they don't have another manned sub on-site, what people were talking about was sending a large unmanned robot-type sub, with a pair of pincer arms, to do the same thing. But they must locate the Titan sub first!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KernowDamoย Don't mention it Damo!!๐๐ (What's not to like: a Cornishman and a socialist all in one! Says this Newquay dweller.. ๐๐)
So: it was the abominable Rishi who got you well over the 1000 followers mark!! Great that he's good for something!! ๐
But seriously: at least that viral video and others on your channel will make you a little money now! ๐
I'd just like to give your viewers some tips about how to support you through the ads. (I looked this all up before the last election.)
1) Turn your b___y ad blocker off, peeps, for the left wing channels! ๐
2) Now. You may get some longer ads, especially on your phone. (On the TV my experience is that a lot more short "TV type" ads come through on YouTube.) But don't worry about the long ads.I'll tell you what to do, peeps! ๐
For the channel owner to get any benefit from the ads, if they're under 1 min, you need to watch at least half. So, for a forty second ad, you need to watch twenty seconds; for a 1 min ad, 30 seconds.
For any longer ad, never mind how long (some people promote an entire video via an ad) all you need do is watch 30 seconds of it, however long the ad is: or to be sure, just over 30 seconds.
That way, you'll make a few cents a time, maybe even a dollar, land in your favourite YouTuber's ad revenue account. At no cost to yourself!! ๐๐
If you are a YouTube Premium subscriber, then a small amount of your monthly Premium fee should go to each site you watch at all regularly. ๐
(I don't know exactly how they work that last one out, so I'm not sure if I trust it!)
For anyone who says YouTube don't put ads on left-wing sites: I've already watched a slew on here, on both phone and TV! I've been seeing them on sites like Novara Media and Al Jaxeera for ages too. (I now at last have WiFi Damo: so I have both going at the same time, unless the phone's on the charger! ๐)
For anyone who doesn't know this: it doesn't matter if you have a 10 year old TV. I have, and I've digitized it! ๐ If it has an HDMI socket on the back: you can stick something like an Amazon Firestick in that, or to my preference, a Chromecast with Google TV (so that's the white dongle type thing with the white remote control in the box with it. You'll have to look on YouTube for setup instructions as they're not in the box ๐) and hey presto! You can watch Damo (and others on Youtube - and yes, Tiktok too) on the big(ish) screen! ๐๐
Oh and Damo. YouTube are monetizing Shorts - did you know?? You should stick some of your shorter TikToks on there: or edit some down! ๐๐
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, there is a climate emergency. But I'm going to tell you frankly what I think, Damo: Which is that our technology and economy is not yet at the stage of tackling it properly!
Take electric cars. Which are supposed to be one of the ways the planet is going to save itself. (There are plenty if YouTube videos contradicting this idea, however. ๐)
These highly expensive vehicles, even when bought reconditioned (which are however supposed to get their drivers relief from road tax, ULEZ and a ton of other crap) use inefficient batteries, which are not at all suitable for longer journeys. I have looked into getting an electric vehicle myself (only advantage I can see down here in Cornwall is if you could charge it up from solar panels, which I have likewise yet to get!!)
But I've been told the batteries need replacing every four to five years; and they cost thousands to replace and.... ๐๐โน๏ธ๐
Plus: they are dependent on rare earth minerals, such as cobalt. Which are only to be found in a few places in the world. I read that some cobalt, along with some lithium and even rarer elements, is even to be found in our county of Cornwall! (Making it more worthwhile to start mining the tin again. ๐ Ive seen plenty of articles GASSING about firms re-starting deep
mining in Cornwall: but I haven't bleddy seen them DOING it! Why not?!)
And so one of the sources of current cobalt mining is in fact Australia, I have read: but the cheapest and the most plentiful is the so-called (ha ha ๐) Democratic Republic Of Congo, where it is scratched out of the hillsides, largely by child miners! Apparently all of the world's corporations are complicit in this, as you can watch on YouTube. How is that good for ANYTHING?? ๐
THEN there is the crappy so-called "congestion charge". I must say, whatever the Green Party think of it, I do think that the vast majority of voters are HIGHLY SKEPTICAL of any new charges, which just press down on them as ordinary people. Along with the cost of living crisis and the mortgage crisis - you think that people in the UK or Outer London want to pay yet another fee or charge? I don't: and I do think that's why Labour failed to win Uxbridge. Voters were obviously fed up of Sadiq Khan's policies more than they were of the Tories. ๐
ยฃ12.50 a day?? (Also in an urban area, where public transport doesn't work very well, at getting you from outer area of London to outer area: because the transport system, especially tube and trains, is arranged like the spokes of a bicycle wheel all leading into the centre: not connecting up the outer areas! As I very well know from living there years ago! ๐)
No, this has been very poorly thought out. And what about businesses? This would put up their charges. What about delivery drivers for Amazon and other firms?
Scientists are right now working on pioneering new battery technology. Give them another few years. Then push to roll out electric vehicles. It's still premature to do so.
There. That's my piece Damo. ๐
Signed, Liz K.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1