Comments by "oneoflokis" (@oneoflokis) on "The Jimmy Dore Show"
channel.
-
39
-
37
-
34
-
18
-
16
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Brainbuster Of course, the problem with the "smaller" payment systems, is that if you get paid for work online, many of the online firms do not support these smaller firms . So your choice is limited by the choices of companies that you work for. 😏 (I expect that the latter have all sorts of excuses, for only, or mainly, dealing with the "big boys". 😏) Companies that are India-based, or deal with Indian workers, generally tend to have Payoneer and Payeer as options. There are of course Russian and other international options as well. Skrill seems to be one that many firms/sites have as an option - any views on that??
Another thing, that I have found, may be a viable option for people who don't wish to be paid into a bank account, or who do work for online firms who do not support this as an international option, is to get their salary/remuneration paid into a "prepaid Visa" account, which is possible with a lot of them.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I have noticed however that there is a bit of a problem comparing Trump voters to UK Brexiters over three years on!! A few short weeks ago, Brits, Leave or Remain, had the chance to vote for a PM, Corbyn, who had a Labour manifesto designed to reverse most of the terrible effects of neoliberalism and austerity, and to give all over 18-yr-olds a £10 - at least - minimum wage. Whereas BoJo, our own particular blond clown who leads the Tory Party - well a few weeks after HE won the election (with all the ease of a Dubya, rather than a Trump) condescendingly promised the workers an £8.72 minimum wage - don't you just love those pinched pennies - in April, *as long as you are over 25*, because you see Brits under 25 aren't really of age, and don't deserve it..🙄
So - WHY, apart from INSANE NATIONALISM (Labour fudged over Brexit) didn't THEY VOTE FOR THE MATERIAL IMPROVEMENT OF TEN QUID PER HOUR IN THEIR HANDS??
Can you riddle me that, please, Jimmy??
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@bikeradam Yeah... A lot of these videos go back to the early 2000s though. Prior to modern Photoshop, AI or any of this current crap everyone is now getting their knickers in a twist about. Besides, there are ways of testing a digital video or photo file to see if they have been altered. Also: Just WHY would the US Navy admit to their pilots sering "UAPs" if they HAVEN'T? (They're not allowed to call them UFOs in interviews though, or to say they're of alien origin. I've seen these interviews. These pilots and ex-pilots are serious. It's no joke nor hoax. Mind you: I'm not at all surprised, because I've taken the reality of UFOs seriously since the 1990s. Ever since I saw a UK ITV (as I recall) documentary in 1993, which was one of the first documentaries I saw that took the subject seriously. It covered a lot of UFO sighting cases (no abduction cases.) The one it led with was the 1990 Belgian UFO sightings/aerial pursuit. Massive triangular UFOS were seen from the ground over a large area of Northern Germany and Belgium. On several occasions during the winter of 1989 to 1990. By hundreds of people, including police, military and other trained observers. They were picked up on radar by several air force bases. The Belgian air force went in hot pursuit, and obtained gun camera footage, but were unable to lock onto these highly manoeuvrable triangles. (A couple of famous photos of them were also taken, I believe from the ground.) The Belgian air force later spoke to the press about it; I think there were press releases. It was all over the Belgian, French, German and other European press. But the English-speaking press in the UK and USA refused to follow the story. Now why is that, do you think?? 😏 "D Notices" in the UK, if you know what they are? 😏
I speak both French and German: but the internet in the early 1990s didn't exist in the UK: certainly not for ordinary Brits. So I didn't find out about it until the 1993 documentary: & I subsequently bought a book published by a small press I think, by a British paranormal investigator who found it equally fascinating.
Ever wondered why the press/authorities are so RELUCTANT, in the English-speaking countries, to let news about, well, "paranormal" (but very well-attested) events, get out, to the people? MUCH more reluctant than the authorities/MSM of many other countries: eg Belgium, Mexico, Spain, Portugal?
Photoshop my backside! 😏 The Anglo world likes to treat its people like mushrooms: feed them on sh*t and keep them in the dark. Before the internet was online to spread news internationally, this was of course child's play. Now we're all online, it is of course more difficult. Hence what I call the US Government's "blurt" of September 2021, when it finally admitted UAPs were real. Scientists have recognised these videos and these admissions. I thought everybody knew it by now. Seems like some are slow on the uptake. 😏
If I were you, I'd do a YouTube search for some of those "Belgian triangle UFO" videos. I watched a long documentary on them on here last year, I think. It was fascinating, and confirmed all I have read.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fact: You see, Jimmy, there are some people who take their religion seriously, and there are others who don't. Or who just interpret it all their own way - ie, all the "prohibitions" apply to people you don't like or who are poorer than you - but with the elite, like with taxes, "sins are for the little people". 😏😏 Michael Moore probably naively thinks that you can morally appeal to the latter kind of person.
But anyway - other than another term of Trump, what did you think that the elite would allow to happen last autumn? What should really have happened, is if the Dems truly hated Trump, they should have let Bernie Sanders through in 2016, when he definitely would have won against Trump.
And btw, I couldn't give a sh*t about Michael Moore's hair.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1