Comments by "killercaos123" (@killercaos123) on "Tucker Carlson confronts Newsweek bias" video.

  1. "Rightism is clearly more than a mental issue. It is an unequivocal spiritual and moral disorder. This man knows he is being confronted with his own lies and is fully aware of his own deceit. That is why he will not answer to the questioner properly. He simply knows he cannot."
    5
  2. To be fair, he "claims" it's not a simple yes or no question, and he needed to explain it in more detail............. Then Tucker keeps asking yes or no. And i guess at some point Kurk kind of just gives up and starts rambling cause he doesn't wanna be there anymore.
    1
  3. MrDementedbaboon You need to think for yourself and not give into group-think. Be an individual not a collectivist.
    1
  4. Tucker carlson is no saint. He's just a corporate shill for the republicans and 50's regressive ideas. I think both of these people are ass-hats. I'm not a ideologue, i know how to think for myself and identify what's true and false. Tucker claimed: "The poorest segment of our society is young people. In fact, this generation is the poorest generation of its age in three generations. They’re the poorest." Like what a dipshit. He's a republican mouthpiece who's a talking robot on tv.
    1
  5. 1. I think journalist and tv pundits should be subjective and not have a agenda. I guess it's bad that i want information to not be politicized. Got i'm a piece of shit. 2. Apparently, me questioning people makes me not independent and not a ideologue. God i must be a piece of shit. 3. He said it. It literally doesn't make sense, cause homeless people are the poorest people in the nation. young people can't be the poorest segment of america. That just doesn't make sense. Also he didn't substantiate it as well, so even HE can't prove it. 4. (see point 1)
    1
  6. MrDementedbaboon Lazy commie bitch. 1. Both of these talking heads are both talking out of their asses. There is nothing here. No "gotcha", no "insightfulness", nothing has come from this. Also when did Newsweek become a reputable news sources? Yes i do believe news should be un-politicized and not be cloughted with ideologues and agendas. I used to like Vice News because they would go outta their way to be implanted with the Iraqi Army and seek out what's happening? Fox News is just like The View. Talking chicks talking about laying eggs. News shouldn't have a political agenda. 2.You're just talking in circles mate. How can i be mis-representing my argument so that i can make it easier to attack? I'm coming from a agenda of not wanting a News organization to not want an agenda, so i'm not independent? I'm not an ideologue? So therefore i'm a straw man? You're just talking in circles mate. You should always be skeptical of people and question why they're doing things. And you certainly aren't. why is that? Are you coming from a political/social view point that you think can never be wrong? 3. Tucker Carlson is a mouth-piece of the Republicans. I heard from a investigational journalist that every mourning in their meetings they have "talking points" in which they have to address. ALL of them are politically Right and never stray from the party line. Let's talk seriously for a second... You obvious read my comments line by line. Do you watch Fox News for it's truth, or its lies? Because if you don't question what any one tells you, how can you be sure about anything in Life? Fox News has a history of Right-biased even sometimes aligning themselves within the party. Fox news is staunchly biased. You have to know this. Fuck both Newsweek and Rupert Murdoch. Question everything and seek out the truth independently. Don't just "sit and believe" like a feminist, always seek the truth. And it sure isn't here. Also you know a Saudi Prince has a controlling stake in Fox News? Whatcha think of that?
    1
  7. Republicans aren't known for their ""intelligence" either.
    1