Comments by "killercaos123" (@killercaos123) on "Thomas Morton Compares the Trump Movement to Classic Literature" video.

  1. troll comment is obvious. lol
    3
  2. Name all 10 bills of rights without looking them up. Go ahead.
    3
  3. +Dave And conservatives are fascists? This is why america is so fucked up. You're just being decisive and driving americans further apart with political bickering. You are part of the problem and not part of the solution. American's need to come together, to work together, to progress together. Not petulant children deciding what's "right" and "wrong".
    3
  4. They're Canadian.
    3
  5. So what's your original point?
    3
  6. SirVixIsVexed Define "intelligence".
    2
  7. Merkel overall is a okay Head of State... She aint perfect but i'd take her over Hillary. And i bet many else would. Also Golda Meir. Can not debate that one.
    2
  8. Well the Republicans drove the latino vote away..... Like they did everything they could to not get those people to vote R. Seriously can't describe how loud i laughed at "into a one-party state from here to eternity." Like wow......... Whereas Republicans want to impose further voting restrictions onto everyday americans. And War with Russia? well that's funny because it's pretty obvious who Putin wants to win, Trump of course. It's pretty obvious. http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-vladimir-putin-russia-hillary-clinton-united-states-europe-516895 #imvoting3rdparty
    1
  9. "Asked about a list of traits and how each would impact their likelihood of supporting a presidential candidate, about half (53%) of Americans said they would be less likely to support an atheist." Also apparently more americans would rather have a gay or lesbian in the White House than a atheist. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/05/29/americans-are-somewhat-more-open-to-the-idea-of-an-atheist-president/
    1
  10. hey look, there are two of them right now. Self-fulfilling prophecy? lol
    1
  11. its true. trump supporters can get PC about Trump.
    1
  12. SirVixIsVexed Mate try again. You can't define a word, with the word you're defining. You're not intelligent.
    1
  13. SirVixIsVexed My point is that your definition of Intelligence is wrapped and biased. You probably define it under ur own terms, not what the definition really is. It's defined as "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skill." At first i was just pulling your chains..... But now, it's sad.
    1