Comments by "Glen" (@glen7318) on "Dereliction Of Familial Pledges | The Crown (Claire Foy, Vanessa Kirby)" video.

@Heartfelt2816 nonsense. Charles knew she was marrying Andrew, and he was upset.
2
rubbish. she was not going to be ostracised.
1
@TRB277 no, she would nto have. She was allowed to continue to do royal duties. She might have spent a year abraod to let things settle but she was not being asked to make a major sacrifice
1
@shruti2748 she would not have lost her title at all.
1
@danielle-g3k hte public weren't aware that George was still giving Ed an allowance. As for Harry HE LEFT TO MAKE MONEY. So why should he expect the British tax payer or his fahter to pay for him? Charles continued to fund him for a year after he left to give him time to adjust, so he should have been able to cope. He had his personal fortune which he inherited from hs motther
1
Harry wanted full time protection paid for by hte tax payer or his father, he wasn't fussy. And now he's whining that he does not get full time protection on his brief visits,,,, which he is never going to get. Most of the RF now only get protection when they are working so why should he have it? CHarles helped Harry out financailly for a year after he left teh UK.... its in his accounts.
1
you do know that this is all lies and it did not happen like that.
1
@ericcarlson3746 this is all nonsense. the C of E was willing to accept Charles as a remarried King and did not wnat him to come to the throne while living iwth his partner
1
@nenisguevaragomez8122 that's a matter of opinion
1
@sharonlock3780 she was not asked to give up her title and privielges. All she was asked to give up was being in the succession. She chose not to
1
nonsense nonsense nonsense. Marg coudl have remained as a princess nad married Peter but she was asked to step out of the succession. she didn't wnat to do that
1