Comments by "Glen" (@glen7318) on "King George V’s Children: Scandalous Siblings" video.

  1. Autism is not caused by ill treatment
    3
  2.  @zakhenson9809  it was not a nickname. A nickname is something like Chalky, or Dusty. David was his family name.
    2
  3. absolute rubbish.
    1
  4. why?
    1
  5. yes because Q Mary was notoriously promiscuous
    1
  6.  @gregoryjones9546  nope. Charles is Ch III. George will be George VII probably
    1
  7. dont talk silly rubbish
    1
  8. no
    1
  9. no.
    1
  10.  @impalamama7302  it was normal practice and probably a lot easier for John
    1
  11. was he? I've never heard of it.
    1
  12. how would Willlam be a child of George V?
    1
  13. you are joking I hope.
    1
  14. Oh. What have you got against the late QUEEN or George VI?
    1
  15.  @bobbyanderson1054  nonsense. If she had any African features how come none of her descendants showed any signs?
    1
  16. dont talk nonsense.
    1
  17. what are you on about?
    1
  18. stop making up silly lies
    1
  19. perhaps you should stop talking rot
    1
  20.  @Vampirecronicler  what are you talking about?
    1
  21.  @Alusnovalotus  dont talk nonsense
    1
  22.  @lauramcnutt9995  no, he didnt. Its Louis Arthur Charles. Easy to find out.
    1
  23. oh what nonsense.
    1
  24. Did he? news to me.
    1
  25. what are you on about?
    1
  26.  @maestroclassico5801  nonsense. Its full of lies and rubbish
    1
  27. nonsense. Its all well known.
    1
  28. George means farmer.
    1
  29. stop talking rubbish
    1