Comments by "Peter" (@peter65zzfdfh) on "ABC Pays Out Trump $16,000,000 for Defamation" video.

⁠ @clayortex this is incorrect, they were required to find he committed the crime for the defamation finding to exist. If they couldn’t find he digitally penetrated her they would have had to find him innocent of defamation. They didn’t convict him, but no one outside the comments here is arguing that straw man, he was found guilty of what most jurisdictions now call rape, even if at the time they only called it sexual assault.
11
@shaswatsingh2629 this is incorrect, the narrow definition that applied at the time isn’t the definition today. Digital rape is rape under today’s legal definition in most every western jurisdiction.
7
@MrMcWitt the settlement didn’t give him any money, it paid his legal fees and gave money to some future library. These things could cost way way more to defend and win than they paid to settle.
3
@ThePownageMaster lol, the irony in that lying and crying sentence.
1
@mothboy420 not in the way they defined it at the time it occurred at least. Just how everyone defines it now.
1