Comments by "Peter" (@peter65zzfdfh) on "Technology Connections" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 1
  7. There's not really such a thing as 'exceeding grid capacity' on a national level. There has ALWAYS been times and locations where a specific area may end up exceeding its local capacity, usually at a peak time (when everyone is getting home from work/school usually), and there's been a lot of excessive building to avoid that. EVs are actually somewhat of an answer to the problem, as there's no reason they need to be charged at that peak time, there's no reason they need to have any negative impact to the grid at that time. If managed right they can actually reduce strain on the grid by charging from those intermittent renewables or when base load has surplus overnight, and have it available for use during peak events. Heat pumps use much much less power than resistive electric heaters, so the overall impact of them is likely a reduction in electricity usage for heating, even if some people are switching from gas. Peak heating demand just isn't at the same time as peak electricity demand. That's more often peak cooling demand (eg, people get home from work in the middle of summer and the house is all hot). So air conditioners are the biggest culprit for grid capacity demands, not so much during the day when solar is probably around, but on very overcast hot days or just after sunset. Most of trying to address capacity is really just dealing with an hour or two of that 'peak' demand, something that tends to rely on batteries / hydro etc to get through. If you snapped your fingers tomorrow and literally EVERYONE had an EV, then maybe they could be a problem. But in reality they are still a small % of the vehicle fleet and that's not likely to change dramatically for the better part of a decade unless you're in Norway.
    1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. You need to experience a decent, modern, inverter unit. They throttle down and do not need to blow air that fast, also one of the reason for larger ducts is so that the air velocity can actually be lower, so there's less of a breeze than with a gas furnace. Gas furnaces need to be warmer to avoid what you get for free with a larger heat pump vent (or a split system). Also more oversized units (as Alec points out) will have a higher minimum flow rate, thus probably lead to more colder air, vs a right sized unit that doesn't need to push as much are at a minimum, but can fill it with more heat per unit volume at the more efficient setting. Gas here increased in price about 10x over the last 10 years. I saved a heap switching away from it. It's a white elephant here, a massive cost saving to go to heat pumps. Also the irony in you believing if there was a dire threat we'd be moving away while noting the unstoppable impact of companies and governments pushing the responsibility onto you so they don't have to take any? Yeah, that's why we've not made major moves. People whined about 'paid bags' at stores here for all of 2 months before 99% of people brought their own reusable bags they bought once for $1 then used for the next 5 years, and everyone else got on with it. I get it change feels hard, but it's honestly not. Hope you get better from your depression. Things are not as bad as you think, the solutions are easy and convenient, once people swore they'd never use computers, then never use mobile phones, then never use the internet, now those people are swearing off whatever else on that internet they swore they'd never use.
    1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. This isn't actually true with modern AC units, they use less power per unit of heat/cool at lower utilization, as they have inverters and ramp down to lower settings that allow them to more efficiently exchange the heat. They also tend to have a 'minimum' they can run at based on the size of the unit. So a very small unit will 99.9% of the time actually use less power for the same result as a larger unit, assuming the outdoor exchanger is the same size (there are several breaks in indoor sizes where they share the same outdoor unit). Because they ramp down, and are more efficient, the air temperature exiting the ducts doesn't need to be much warmer than the indoor air at all. Yes, if you have a horrifically insulated home, you might feel it needs to be, but any bare minimum modern standard home, you do not want 140 degree air, you will have a boiling hot part of the room and a freezing part of the room when what you want is the whole room being warm. The 'resistive backup' if you watched the video is in case the entire system fails so that pipes don't freeze, not to be used on 99.8% of days. Here we don't get freezing pipes, we wouldn't need any backup. But if you're running a 'resistive backup' for only a couple of hours a year, a smaller system for most of the year will save you money as most of the time it will run in a more efficient zone. Also if you watched the video the ducts are inside, so any heat escaping them is entering the house anyway, more evenly than a furnace blasting it out the vent before shutting off a few seconds later or overheating the whole room.
    1
  54. 1
  55. Well you're in luck. Winters have not gotten warmer or cooler minimums. The coldest it gets is basically unchanged pretty much any year this century. There are MORE warm days, but the cold days are not that much warmer, and the warm days are usually not that much warmer. It's just the balance that has shifted. And there's no sign that balance is doing anything but accelerating to the warmer side. If that's the coldest day of the year, and the other resistive heat was there already, it's likely the energy savings from a smaller system every other day will more than offset the cost of running resistive heat for those few hours. If it was weeks and weeks of several hours a day, then you'd have more of a point. Resistive heaters will generally last decades and decades though. I know people with them that have been there for 50 years. They are very dumb, 100% efficient devices. If it was 4F outside I'm not sure I'd hate them as a backup option. If it was regularly 4F outside for weeks and you had six feet of snow I'd get a ground source heat pump instead. Smart thermostats kind of negate the 'time to heat up' problem for Alec. If he's running the heat 24x7 to keep pipes from freezing then it's not coming up from freezing after he's walked in the door, it's always somewhat pleasant and automatically heats up in advance of it being required. Even here where I don't need heat on when I'm out, if it's that cold I can turn on the heat remotely and so walk into a warm house / or set it to wake up to a warm house, which is much better than going into a cold house and having to warm it up quickly.
    1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1