Comments by "ThatDutchguy" (@thatdutchguy2882) on "David Davis: Cameron could remain PM after Brexit - BBC News" video.

  1. If the Dutch Prime-Minister Mark Rutte puts aside the legal vote in the legally binding referendum on the association agreement with the Ukraine that we Dutch voted No on like he did on the Lisbon agreement, you might be looking at a NExit next !
    4
  2. Jimiie Nope,...After it reached more then 30% turnout it became legally binding, learn something about Dutch law kid.
    2
  3. I don't think he can really stay with this Panama debacle, so after a Brexit and then subsequently loosing Scotland because they'll leave, nah Dodgy Dave had his day,...he peaked, it's all downhill from here.
    2
  4. You've got Dodgy Dave,..We've got Meandering Mark .
    2
  5. Your dreaming a dream that sunk beneath the waves mate !
    1
  6. SlightlyVisible Australia is still part of a Kingdom they 74% don't want and their trade is fully dependent on China not to mention their security is provided by the USA mostly that's not what free means mate ! Canada is very mutch depending on US trade, so making any real independent decisions on any real policies is just makeup,..that's not what being free means eh ! Britain is between a rock and a hard place, stay and be totally subjugated by Brussel, leave and loose not only Scotland to the EU, but a whole lot of trade and way more, so a Brexit won't give them freedom. New Zealand ?, a place we Dutch gave a name then decided to just keep it at that, not to mention it runs on Australia and they run on China, that's not freedom. So, a revival of the pipedream,...nah never going to happen, it sunk twice now beneath the waves.
    1
  7. SlightlyVisible The Scottish actually do, they have made it very clear actually that within a year of the Brexit that's exactly what's going to happen. No they can't do the same as Canada did with Quebec, Scotland is a whole different ball game mate. Canada, Australia and "New Zealand"?⬅again why mention NZ at all ?,..but CA and Aus are not sovereign in their laws either but governed by Nato and the UN, the one being USA in anything but name and the other sits in New York and is heavily influenced by the USA that's not freedom eh ! Even in that regard it's sunk beneath the waves again,...it simply won't float dude.
    1
  8. SlightlyVisible​ So the pacific trade deal that's recently been made passed you by completely ? Non of the Nation's you've mentioned are free and definitely not all are sovereign to themselves, you do know that don't you ?! You don't have to be in Nato, and believe me they are in the UN to be beholden to their policies mate. Scotland has been semi independent from Britain for along time now, it's called devaluation, they have their own bloody parliament and Pound "the Scottish pound"⬅ Ay it's legal tender ! They won't go for federalism, that's made very clear by the Scottish themselves because they are and have been there already for donkey years now mate,...do get with the times ! It's going to be a full blown independence an complete break from the UK mate,...sorry but your dreaming of a dream that has sunk beneath the waves atleast a 100 years or more ago, it definitely drew it's last breath right after WW1. And if you think the USA is not directly and openly pushing it's agenda and policies on its so called allies then i want to live in that dream your living in because it sounds great, if it wasn't for the fact reality is different. It's 2016 not 1900 mate, get with it ! 
    1