Youtube comments of Max Strelets (@maxstrelets263).

  1. that's volume, I think they were talking about the diameter based on the visuals.
    4
  2. Why it's wrong, if we r manipulating of our own?
    4
  3. If we reason reason sensibly, neutron stars have magnetic fields due to electric currents from charged particles inside them, similar to electromagnets. Although they are filled with neutrons, the presence of protons and electrons contributes to these magnetic fields. The enormous strength of these fields is still a subject of research, and theories such as "flux freezing" offer a partial explanation.
    4
  4.  @WahrheitMachtFrei.  good for you that you understand, but answering my question with an another question instead of explaining.
    3
  5. Lie is everywhere. Earth is most likely pizza shaped!
    3
  6. Absolutely mmmassive! They've raised the bar once again, as if being at the top wasn't enough!"
    3
  7. Speaking in real - you are highlighting a fascinating aspect of Einstein's general relativity, where gravity, influenced by mass warping spacetime, affects the passage of time. This phenomenon, known as gravitational time dilation, is most noticeable near massive objects like neutron stars. It does imply that at the atomic scale, or in regions with less significant gravitational fields, time dilation effects would be much subtler and harder to observe directly.
    3
  8. It is quite simple. Neutron stars are observed using X-ray and gamma-ray telescopes. These telescopes detect the high-energy radiation emitted by neutron stars, revealing their properties and behaviors through the analysis of their spectra.
    2
  9.  @mgabriel2636  p.s. Imagine being on a boat floating down a river. Your speed can be measured relative to the riverbank (a stationary reference), or to another boat (a moving reference). Similarly, the Milky Way's speed is measured relative to stationary or moving reference points in the universe, not the Earth's surface.
    2
  10. I think it would take a whole team of CGI creation specialists to produce such an animation. Some of the animations from the video were produced by NASA over months and even years after the whole complex of pre-simulation process.
    2
  11. Whatever will happen, will happen, but humanity is boosting some thingth maan
    2
  12.  @chopperoon1  While it's tempting to view a 1.2-degree increase over 100 years as 'minuscule,' it's crucial to understand the broader context. This seemingly small temperature rise has already led to significant changes in climate patterns, including more frequent and severe weather events. As for the 400 ppm of CO2, it's not just the absolute number that matters, but the rate at which it's increasing. The global average atmospheric CO2 was 417.06 ppm in 2022, setting a new record high. This marks the 11th consecutive year where the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by more than 2 ppm. The annual rate of increase in atmospheric CO2 over the past 60 years is about 100 times faster than previous natural increases, such as those that occurred at the end of the last ice age 11,000-17,000 years ago. Moreover, CO2 is Earth's most important greenhouse gas. In 2021, CO2 alone was responsible for about two-thirds of the total heating influence of all human-produced greenhouse gases. Even a 'low' concentration of 400 ppm has significant implications for global warming and ocean acidification. So, while the numbers may seem small in isolation, their impact on our planet is anything but. It's not just about what will happen naturally; it's about how human activities are accelerating these changes at an unprecedented rate. I'd recommend doing your own research to understand the gravity of these numbers, rather than relying solely on someone else's interpretation of these studies.
    2
  13. Хм.. Весьма громкое название у ролика. Ну вот почему народ настолько слеп, что после очередной новости СМИ все в один голос начинают блеять в том направлении, которое им задали?никто ведь не сказал что в Бердянске и Мариуполе максимальная осадка 6.1 и 9.75 соответственно (да и то, в лучшие времена)да и никто не сказал, что Россия имеет 5 торговых портов на территории азовского морячто торговый сбор в портах не так уж и велик, и убытки понесут не столько порты, сколько грузовладельцыи в конце-концов, что если бы никакого конфликта с Крымом и не было, то никто и словом бы не обмолвился о задержках в судоходстве и сопутствующих нюансах при аналогичных строительных работахПожалуйста, смотрите на вещи трезвее и взвешивайте реальные факты, а не только ту информацию, которую Вам подают.
    2
  14. No, mate. It's called a bit simpler - a black hole)
    2
  15. Again, great vid C: Moreover, You can edit analyzed elements in order to improve and match with the desired output. E.g.: In the Voice element Occasionally include quotes read in third person.
    2
  16. Oh man, rly like u`r vids) In about two months, I have developed and use almost the same strategy for writing near-science video scripts. Working grate till now)
    2
  17. ddddddddddddaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamnnnnnnnn
    2
  18. how about a sprinkling of God's will? :D
    2
  19.  @scruffynerfherder33  damn. they usualy kick me man. for less.. when i was a hunter, who pulled thouse..
    2
  20. 1:33 I was waiting for that question :D
    1
  21. It looks like a bloody circus from a european's POV
    1
  22. fatctimism.. factivism? what?
    1
  23. 31:00 The Trouth come out..
    1
  24. ​ @mgabriel2636  No, you don't. It is actually moving around hes feet from that point of view, that you determined. Lets call it "Chuck's feet coordinate system" so the 0,0,0 point starts from it big toe. In this case earth will moves beneath it. However, it's important to note that in physical reality, both Chuck Norris and the Earth are subject to the laws of gravity and motion. Chuck cannot physically remain stationary while the Earth moves beneath him. But initially I missunderstood you'r comment, you are partially right. In space and physics, motion is always relative. This means that an object is considered stationary only in relation to a specific frame of reference. When measuring the speed of the Milky Way, astronomers use the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) as a reference. The CMB serves as a nearly universal frame of reference, allowing scientists to approximate the notion of being "stationary" on a cosmic scale.
    1
  25. @mgabriel2636 Yes, the CMB does exhibit a Doppler shift due to the motion of our galaxy. Despite its overall uniformity, the CMB's slight variations allow us to detect this shift. This provides valuable information about the direction and speed of our galaxy's movement in space.
    1
  26.  @RT-qd8yl  Weren't you talking about frame rate, rather than resolution?
    1
  27. Yes, it is. Like most known moons.
    1
  28. Thats right, but JWST kinda discovered that it was truly farthest one.
    1
  29. Man, neutron stars collide when they're in binary systems or close enough to attract each other gravitationally, eventually spiraling in due to energy loss from emitting gravitational waves. The vast space between them might contain some matter, but as they near, their intense gravity dominates, possibly capturing or disrupting nearby debris. This process is slow on human timescales but inevitable over cosmic time.
    1
  30. Ah, the allure of neat numerical coincidences — always a crowd-pleaser but not exactly the backbone of scientific discovery. Remember, correlation is not causation, no matter how tempting it is to connect those dots. These numbers need more than a wink and a nudge to transform into a solid theory. We're talking robust framework and hard empirical evidence here, not just a fancy magic trick with statistics.
    1
  31.  @ronaldkemp3952  While the 10,000 to 1 ratio you've observed is intriguing, it's important to understand that scientific theories are built on more than just patterns or correlations, no matter how consistent they may seem. A key aspect of scientific inquiry is the ability to explain phenomena through testable mechanisms and predictions, not just through observed ratios. In the case of your theory, for it to gain scientific credibility, it would need to be rigorously tested and validated through a range of observations and experiments, ideally by independent researchers. This would involve not only checking other stars and galaxies for the same ratio but also understanding and explaining the underlying mechanism that would cause such propulsion, and how it aligns with established laws of physics. Furthermore, consistency in a pattern doesn't automatically imply a causative relationship. In astrophysics, especially, where we're dealing with immensely complex systems, numerous factors could lead to similar observational outcomes. A comprehensive theory would need to account for these variables and offer explanations that are consistent with what we already understand about physics, particularly gravity and motion. I am genuinely curious about your work and would be glad to get acquainted with your research. Can I find it on arXiv or researchgate? I encourage continuing this kind of curious inquiry, but also suggest considering the broader scientific context and the rigorous processes required to establish new theories in the field of cosmology.
    1
  32. Oh, I am so glad that I can't do more nonsense that I could..
    1
  33. The discoveries are not endpoints demanding explanations but starting points for future research.
    1
  34. In fact, all responsibility rests with the captain, even if the pilot in charge
    1
  35. 25:15 "а сисеk что не будет, я вон показывал члеh и дымоход" подскажите пожалуйста, кто знает, что за фильм с Джеем?
    1
  36.  @angrygoose5025  cпасибо, уже нашли и посмотрели)
    1
  37. А шо за сезон такий, коли ціни на паливо ростуть, хтось підкаже де шукати?)
    1
  38. 10:22 "чо дєлать?" 100 тищ нових ванєк відправляти)
    1
  39.  @WahrheitMachtFrei.  oh, so thats why they r not existing?
    1
  40. Alan Dressler looks like an alien :D p.s. CGI is amaizing <3
    1
  41. Зроби-зроби, вони там над хмарами віють мабудь..
    1
  42. Man, here in Ukraine we do not have such a forgoten places like this, idk even why.. buuut the difference is that US people is doing that by themself i guess.. And meantime we got an invasion, which we can't withstan witout outer assistance from poverwfull allies. And if we will fall, who will be the next target?
    1
  43. Canadian dollar is a secondary currency after the mapple syrop :DD
    1
  44. Oh man, I have the same teacher type in my lectures, I wish he was bette that time, lol)
    1
  45. 26:06 - топовый ответ. Никогда не понимал в чем проблема тех кто ноет - просто взять и уе*ать на кацапщину.
    1
  46. Damn, that looks like my gramma's BeefStroganoff
    1
  47. ребят, кто помнит название трэка с эпик музлом - йо мама сйа йо маё (сори, тайминг в видео потерял)
    1
  48. Fascinating perspective! Perhaps this research paper might shed some light on the matter, if you find it comprehensible.. DOI:10.3390/ani13030471
    1
  49. actually they allredy made one - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOwLKxytWYs&t=1s
    1
  50. який жах
    1
  51. In science, theories are indeed built on observation and experimentation, but they also contain an element of speculation, as they attempt to explain the unknown based on the kinda known.
    1
  52. Am I the only one who thinks the interface has been adopted from the New World?
    1
  53. what a clown show
    1
  54. It was actually said that this is an ultra-long-period signal.
    1
  55. Such things are called "dark nebula", like Barnard 68. Which, by the way, is similar in shape to a boot. Coincidence? I don't think so)
    1
  56. It is a potentially confusing terminology but also showcases the fascinating ways in which different disciplines adapt language to fit their understanding of the universe. Considering the metallicity of stars, we can say that it has nothing to do with the physical state of their material. It tells us that an element with a mass heavier than helium is present in a star, galaxy or other astronomical object.
    1
  57. :D
    1