Comments by "The MSM Loves war" (@themsmloveswar3985) on "Milo Yiannopoulos Speech Protests Turns Violent at UC Berkeley" video.

  1. Only for UC-B. And to be honest they are more interested in starting a riot than in studying. Therefore he is right. Public money would be more appreciated in other colleges, which are not loaded with pampered brats.
    5
  2. No. This is not the time for violence. This is a time for rational, open, free debate.
    4
  3. I have never heard of, watched or listened to Breitbart. I don't care how offensive it is to some people. Offense is taken not given. If anybody is offended, change the channel, and boycott Breitbart. Be civil about it. What occurred in UC-B is indicative of a deep intolerance problem in a certain political ideology compliant mindset. It is even worse that a billionaire who is deemed a law breaker in several countries, is paying protestors for brat antics and the destruction of property that is there to serve others.
    2
  4. If they are not stopped, that is exactly what they will do.
    2
  5. Whether people agree with Milo Y. is irrelevant. He should be allowed to say whatever he wants. No matter how offensive, or difficult, or stupid, or threatening or whatever. These brats indicated an intolerance for allowing another person to express his mind. If you oppose somenobdy's viewpoint then the sensible thing to do would be to engage in a rational, calm, measured debate. Based on the antics, and rabble rousing, it seems that rationality, calm, and discussion are the last thing that they will do. None of the protestors gave him a debate. All they can do is intimidate, and shout. That is a far greater concern that anything Milo Y says. In other words, he proved a point, by the fact that they behaved in an ingnorant, intolerant manner.
    2