Comments by "Lil Weasel ♡" (@lil_weasel219) on "Veritasium"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Baiedes
And now a final section on absolutism, that is demand of absolute objectivity, absolute knowledge and absolute certainty (100%, no decimals) of knowledge. This is in the realm of philosophy, specifically epistemology, and is what you are pointlessly drilling now,like many kids and adults alike have done.
But why find me to explain it to you when you have the entire internet at your disposal. Do read into epistemology
Find Andrew Rae's answer on this;
https://www.quora.com/Can-we-ever-prove-anything-with-absolute-100-accuracy
"proof" is limited to mathematics.
Natural sciences use provisional evidence.
PS It will be sad if you miss it again, but my job here is done. I do not intend on wasting time on folk like this anymore.
I have provided you with resources.
Read bro.
Serving on a platter no more.
Wont be replying.
EDIT: let me just say that your apparently demonstrated lack of discernment between what a theory is and what a hypothesis is shows a basal lack of education in this field. I think it is rather telling.
You learn that even in middle school for the first time, but even if you forget that, if you actually care about what's true, you won't allow such blatant lack of investment in the methods of attaining that truth.
Most people dont know the difference and use it wrong. Similarly most folk are abysmal at scientific thinking, and its starkingly correlational
1
-
1