Comments by "Michael Dunham" (@michaeldunham3385) on "VICE News" channel.

  1. Lichlord Kazam Nexus is correct you're nothing but an armchair soldier
    32
  2. Lichlord Kazam well it's very simple you make comments without understanding the situation. When was the last time the Ukrainian military took place in a conflict prior to this one? Lack of experience with with lack of training because essentially it is a poor country means they are doing on the job training. Under such circumstances I know you wouldn't last 5 minutes, yet you think you have the right to criticise people defending their country from foreign aggression. Yep you're an idiot
    30
  3. Lichlord Kazam Yes I will say what I want and there is nothing that sycophants such as yourself can but show what idiots you are
    24
  4. Lichlord Kazam and that is why the west is providing them with training, so they don't need to learn that way however it has historically been the way in the past.
    14
  5. Typical Cossack are there Ukrainian troops in Russia? No of course not
    11
  6. KV I obviously know a lot more than yourself given your incredibly simplistic comments. The separatists/terrorists used such tactics to bring the local population into submission those are the facts in many cases there's supporting video evidence. If such an insurgency occurred in Russia with foreign backing we all know how Putin would react, the cites would be turned into dust. If the people of eastern Ukraine want peace then the only solution is for Putin to stop supporting terrorism.
    9
  7. Andrey Yeltsov this war was over 4 years ago, only Putin keeps it going. The blood of the civilians is on his hands and the terrorists he supports.
    8
  8. KV oh look another armchair soldier, these men are trying to save their country from terrorists who have as UN reports say  these armed groups continue to abduct, detain, torture and execute people kept as hostages in order to intimidate and “to exercise their power over the population in raw and brutal ways
    8
  9. Typical Cossack In the 1994 Budapest agreement the memorandum included security assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan, this included Crimea.  And of the Black Sea Agreement where in exchange for leasing bases in Crimea Russia was bound to "respect the sovereignty of Ukraine, honor its legislation and preclude interference in the internal affairs of Ukraine" Of course Putin being the criminal he is completely disregard both these when he illegally annexed Crimea.  So question is does Russia allow such referendums on their territory?
    5
  10. Andrey Yeltsov 6 deaths can hardly be called genocide, you're looking at injury reports and assuming that they are deaths. Reading the report I am forced to wonder who put so many civilians in harms way, the conclusion is that the separatists have from the beginning hid amongst the civilian population causing such casualties. The separatists use civilian deaths as a propaganda tool.
    5
  11. David Fu it's not even close to the Marshall Plan
    5
  12. Andrey Yeltsov nope there are people in Russia who have similar views about Ukraine, but do they represent all Russians? The separatists simply took control of eastern Ukraine and anyone who disagreed were subjected to brutal tactics
    4
  13. Kelvin Shen why biased? Explain
    3
  14. Andrey Yeltsov it says no such thing, but of course I already knew this before I read the report. The question is did you read this? The UNHCR says it had good access to those people being held by the Ukrainian government, but not those being held by the separatists, why is this? Because they are hiding the truth. The report also confirms Russian forces are in Eastern Ukraine despite Putin's claims otherwise, but we have become accustomed to his lies now.
    2
  15.  @owand5017  That's nothing more than a myth no such deal was ever made
    2
  16.  @tl1146  you're talking crap, Farage hasn't got a French passport nor does he live in France. Every UK tax payer pays money to the EU, in fact part of the VAT goes directly to them so enough of the BS about direct payments it's an obvious smoke screen
    2
  17.  @tl1146  Visit France while the streets are on fire? France who has even more debt than the UK? Please don't waste people's time with your BS, it's not worth our time.
    2
  18. Hani Naz under what rock do you live?
    1
  19. daniel alvarado the FSB have literally visited every hooligan in Russia and explained to them, any trouble and they will disappear
    1
  20. news buster Yes of course
    1
  21.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  You're completly clueless who simply post Kremlin propaganda
    1
  22.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  you can't prove anything because all you do is parrot comments you've seen made by others. Unfortunately for you the facts don't support those views
    1
  23.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  Your using information supplied by the Kremlin to justify your claims. The problem is however is that the Kremlin has consistently lied in particular regarding MH-17. For example the Kremlin first claimed that the airliner was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter jet, the produced satellite images, radar images and even eye witnesses to back up their claims. Of course when the bodies of the pilots were found to have fragments of a BUK missile inside them the Kremlin were forced to change their lies and create a new lie that this was a Ukrainian BUK missile and not a Russian one. They of course created false documents to back up their claims, but there is overwhelming evidence that the missile came from Russia and was fired from the territory controlled by the separatists
    1
  24.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  It's a myth that the BUK can only be used with an additional guidance vehicle, another Kremlin lie. Russian media reports at the time said that the separatists had shot down a Ukrainian cargo aircraft in that area that day they quickly however removed the article when it became clear that it was in fact MH-17
    1
  25.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  Ukraine does not manufacture any BUK missiles they come from Russia, I haven't mentioned Bellingcat.. I have mentioned the images and information supplied by the Kremlin at the time where they claimed to have proof that a Ukrainian fighter jet was responsible..... This has been proven to be 100% a Kremlin lie.
    1
  26.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  there's no such thing as as radio proximity fuse. Who exactly caught Ukraine faking audio recordings? Ah a claim made by an individual on YouTube, this is what you consider evidence? Boeing is an aircraft manufacturer, what expertise do they have on missiles? Assuming I accept that claim. The information from Russia was rejected because of the the previous falsified information they provided. An analysis by the JIT was conducted into the missile I've already pointed out the false claims made by the Kremlin, the Russian TV channel Life News reported claims regarding a Ukrainian cargo aircraft being shot down, so where is this aircraft?
    1
  27.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  I apparently know more about the BUK than yourself
    1
  28.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  Why would Ukraine be looking for missile launches from the separatists? Up until that point they had only used MANPAD's....... Your reasoning has no logic, also where was the evidence from Russia regarding this missile launch? We know that they were monitoring Ukrainian airspace, but they only had produced the fake fighter jet radar images...... Wake up the Kremlin always lies
    1
  29.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  it is irrelevant whether I do or not. The question is that you have failed to answer is why would Ukraine deploy such a weapon against an enemy with no aircraft? The simple fact is they would not. However Ukraine was using military aircraft against the separatists and we know that the separatists had previously shot down such aircraft. So for them such weapons were necessary and yet you chose to ignore the obvious flaws in your claim
    1
  30.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  I've already commented on your point regarding the SBU..... it is based on information from a person on YouTube, not the Russian government or the Ukrainian government. Life News is one of the largest news channels in Russia yet you prefer to listen to the opinion of an individual on YouTube 😂
    1
  31.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  Can you explain why the Russian government claimed MH-17 was shot by a Ukrainian fighter jet? Why they provided false satellite and radar images? The fake witnesses who claimed have seen a Ukrainian fighter jet attack MH-17? And you ask why the JIT does not trust Russian evidence? 😂 There was no genocide in Dombass only Kremlin backed thugs killing anyone who opposed them
    1
  32.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  So you do not believe the Russian media but you believe the Russian government? 😂 I look at the evidence and where the claims come from, the claim about the SBU came from an individual on YouTube, unfortunately such people edit recordings to show what they want you to believe.
    1
  33.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  no they forced to admit that it was shot down by a BUK, this is not what they originally claimed, it is not the first time they lied about such a thing
    1
  34.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  and so we have the predictable accusations of being a Nazi. For what reason would the JIT lie? They are an investigative committe not a court, you don't even know basic facts. There's a UN report regarding civilian deaths in Dombass, they say this is often because the separatists place their artillery on civilian buildings... The separatists do care about the civilians, they are just a propaganda tool, also who says 15,000 have died? YouTube again?
    1
  35.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  do you ever read the Russian media? 😂 They complained that the US did NOT provide any satellite images I think these claims are just a fantasy of yours But please show me the images 😄 The SU-25 is a ground attack fighter jet, why would Ukraine use this to attack an airliner at 33,000ft? You have no answer to the question.
    1
  36.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  the images show only the remains of the the BUK not who fired it, of Russia once again has produced false information it is what they do
    1
  37.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  Again I ask why would Ukraine deploy a BUK against an enemy with no aircraft? You have no answer.....
    1
  38.  Ignacio Muñoz Diaz  You believe the Soviet archives? The archive is not in question the question is the information provided by the Kremlin the truth? I again remind you that they have already submitted false information in regards to MH-17 so I do not accept that this new information they claim is from the archive is the truth. Digital analysis of what? Fake Russian evidence? Your military training? 😂 Let explain the Russian government has not disputed what weapon was used, so now you are actually calling the Russian government liars 😂 The Russian government have only disputed from where it was launched. The JIT have never claimed the airliner was over flown, their report can be viewed in full on YouTube so do not make claims that are simply not true. Most Russian people do not believe their own government 😂 This can be seen in the official Russian web site on public opinion. Why would the Ukrainian military be looking for missile launches or aircraft? No you have never been in military this is obvious to anyone. You know nothing about Russia or Ukraine or how this conflict began
    1
  39.  @LaVictoireEstLaVie  because none it is true
    1