Comments by "" (@TheDavidlloydjones) on "Pelosi's Power: Eric Cantor (interview) | FRONTLINE" video.

  1. Why would they be evil? The Speaker of the House, indeed the leadership of both parties, are among the people leading the country. Their secrets are the national defense of the country. There is nothing for her to be ashamed of in that.
    3
  2. But he didn't represent them wickedly enough for the radical right: he was defeated in the Republican primary by an extremist nutcase even uglier than himself.
    3
  3. At 11:04 poor lying Cantor confirms what the interviewer says while pretending not to: only after twisting arms did he come close to what the GOP had promised. His "Nancy didn't have the votes" is disingenuous. She was in the minority: she didn't have the votes to save a Republican President by herself. She did have he votes she had promised. The GOP was the bunch who didn't have the votes until the second time around.
    2
  4. Tough, smart, and decent.
    2
  5.  @saltyclassicviews5305  Her husband is a major league property developer -- in California, where it has been difficult not to to make money in that racket over the last fifty years. It has nothing to do with her salary -- and you are very stupid to go around making cynical comments like that without doing your homework. You both make a fool of yourself and degrade the level of public discourse by making that sort of ugly, ignorant remarks of that sort. No doubt that's why you hide behind anonymity.
    1
  6. 🤣😂🤣
    1
  7.  @12yearssober  Marrying a bright young guy who becomes a property developer? Does it every time... Uh, not quite every time.
    1
  8. Her husband has no "limo business" in China. He has made money on the US NASDAQ betting on Alphabet futures, an investment at arm's length from China. You're just repeating old -- ten years old -- inventions from Breitbart, and it's nonsense, fake "Thinker."
    1
  9. You haven't done your homework, well-named "Sissy." If you had, you would have seen that she got to be one of the House Leadership by being exactly the opposite -- by understanding what other Members wanted and needed and working cooperatively to get it done.
    1