Comments by "" (@TheDavidlloydjones) on "John Coogan" channel.

  1.  @mikeandersson7962  Wrong, Mike. (And I assume the word you're looking for is "intelligent.") Sharing learning makes both the sharers stronger, wiser, more operationally intelligent. To the extent that we partner with the Chinese, both we and they benefit. Cutting them from us cuts us from them -- and makes both of us weaker. It is a policy of defeat.
    2
  2. He doesn't need to connect with people who buy "homes," i.e. houses. He sells to architects and real-estate promoters. If he wants a future, he'll learn to sell to builders..
    2
  3. There were submarines around n the Civil War -- the famous Monitor.
    2
  4. He doesn't make pre-fabs and nobody here is pushing them, you halfwit. He makes components which builders assemble into houses.
    1
  5. I don't think invention is the problem. The long grind of setting up a distribution system and selling to builders is what always stops people. If a company has a distribution and sales operation in operation, e.g. the glass-makers, a new invention, e.g. sealed double-pane units, goes into widespread international adoptions toot sweet.
    1
  6. At 5:44 Terrible news for you folks: Japanese notes are written in Kanji, "Chinese" characters, not Roman script.
    1
  7. Poor Coogan got a tour of a factory, a free lunch maybe, and he goes totally goo-goo. Sad. VR? The DOD has been using every sort of simuation in existence -- financing most of them -- for seventy years. There's just aero defence news here.
    1
  8. "Second sourcing," not "secondary." The essence of the idea is that there be two secure possibilities, not that there is a primary and a secondary, a truth which one very much wishes to keep quiet.
    1