Comments by "" (@TheDavidlloydjones) on "White House blasts Mueller's op-ed on Roger Stone's commutation" video.

  1. "I did answer that, Jenna. I said `I'm not going to answer that, Jenna,' so you see I answered that. Jenna." 🤣😅😄🤣 This has been your Fox News news. You have just been foxed.
    28
  2.  Linda Catz  Yes, Linda. If you consider saying "I'm not going to answer that" an answer. It is an answer. It just doesn't answer the question. Get it?
    4
  3. Many journalists listen to police radio full time. No surprise here: just competent journalism.
    4
  4.  travis anders  Not true: President Obama's mass pardons of minor drug offenders very carefully screened out any with convictions involving violence. Your post is an evidence-free statement of the precise opposite of the truth.
    2
  5.  Annamarie Seaman  Quite right. He did: Non-violent "offenders" of drug laws that are now being rapidly repealed. The original post's lie is not the numbers, which are small, given the tens of thousands of people unjustly jailed. The lie is about the violent: the ones pr\ardoned were carefully checked.
    2
  6.  @jamesmartin7105  Do you mean "you're"?? As in, e.g., "You're a half-wit"? 🤣 Apologies to the good and useful number 0.5.
    2
  7.  @rynnykitty6945  CNN were probably just listening to police radio. But you gotta admit, following up on leaks -- particularly accurate ones -- is just competent coverage, doncha think?
    2
  8.  @rynnykitty6945  Most of the media are in the business us selling us, the watchers, to the advertisers -- the audience they have to serve. In that sense, I think you're right that they are corrupt. They are quite precisely selling us to them, the opposite to what they are pretending to do. The journalists on the front lines, on the other hand, are regular working stiffs, doing their jobs as well as they can. Some are good at it, some are not so good. And some who pose as journalists are nothing of the sort. Editorial fades off into rank propagandizing pretty quickly in some places, and some are far far worse in that regard than others.
    2
  9.  @chadhaire1711  How do you know that, Chad? And in any event, so what? If a major league criminal like Stone is about to be arrested, that's news, isn't it?
    2
  10.  Annamarie Seaman  He didn't "validate" anything. He's just making stuff up. You've been foxed again.
    1
  11.  Linda Catz  It answers the person by telling her that the question is not going to be answered. "GET IT?" (You can use a spritz of WD-40 to loosen up your caps-lock key if you find it sticking too much. 😎)
    1
  12.  Linda Catz  🤣😂😁😂🤣!!!
    1
  13.  @rynnykitty6945  How not? You mean they don't have a Lord High Hannity to shout at everybody telling them what to think? Is that your idea of competence?
    1
  14.  Casey Cowley  Have a Kleenex, Casey. You're frothing at the mouth. Journalists very often do cover SWAT teams -- and they know to stay out of the way, not give anything away to the perps, and so forth. And incidentally, nobody said a scanner was your "all they needed." I just pointed out that nobody with a scanner would need to be "pipped off." Nor even routinely informed. Good luck with that mouth.
    1
  15.  Casey Cowley  Hey, all journalists travel with satellite trucks and need 15 minutes of set-up time. I didn't know that. Thank you. Thank-you. Thank-you, thankyouthankyou. I guess that's so they can set up the lights to let the perps know they're about to get their doors knocked in, right? I'm just guessing. Clearly, you know more about al of this than the rest of us out here...
    1
  16.  @mikepierce4657  It's perfectly innocent however they got there, Mike. The press have the right and the duty to cover police and FBI actions.
    1
  17.  Casey Cowley  What a sad little whiner you are, Casey! Being there 15 minutes beforehand is exactly what a stake-out is for, dummy. The satellite trucks are in your imagination: they lugged the videotape back to the studio, fool.
    1