Comments by "" (@TheDavidlloydjones) on "CNN" channel.

  1. 272
  2. 239
  3. 72
  4. 52
  5. 49
  6. 38
  7. 37
  8. 27
  9. 26
  10. 23
  11. 23
  12. 22
  13. 22
  14. 21
  15. 18
  16. 16
  17. 16
  18. 15
  19. 15
  20. 14
  21. 14
  22. 13
  23. 13
  24. 13
  25. 13
  26. 13
  27. 12
  28. 12
  29. 12
  30. 12
  31. 12
  32.  @neilprintz8428  Neil, I dunno, I can't take this buzzword-of-the-day thing seriously. Where did "cancel culture" come from? Women's Wear Daily? Some afternoon TV show with a bunch of Anaheim housewives in the audience? Whenever "people" say that X is "a thing," the way cancel culture is a thing right now, my tendency is to tune out. Kaleigh McElvaney seems to me an interesting character in exactly the same way as Sarah Sanders was. Both of them are strong women, both with a solid twenty or thirty IQ points on poor Donnie, and both of them with the same very difficult job, making sense out of a totally incoherent policy program. They have a basic simple problem: Trump's "program" is the dumb shit that half-wits talk in bars all the time. It's the meat and potatoes of Fox programming -- all the stuff that twelve-year-old Roman Catholic boys believed in 1970. It's nonsense because it doesn't make sense in the real world. You can write novels about it, and Ayn Rand and any number of pessimistic mitteleuropisch novelists have done so. That is not the kind of thing you can hold a pep rally for in the White House Briefing Room. The Evangelicals have a different set of problems but the same hard situation: they've backed themselves into a corner. They've voted for destroying their own pensions, health care, and even their furshlugginer soy-bean markets. All in the name of a white, blue-eyed Jesus. At the margins, 12~20% of all families, the kids are just looking at their parents funny. I come from a little village where there is a Camp Zion, where they have Holness Meetings every summer. The people who go to those meetings are perfectly nice people. But they didn't vote for a narcissistic failed real-estate hustler to run their lives when I was a kid. All across America something like 10% of the people, a third to a quarter of the Republican base, have made a mistake, and if they don't know it, they very certainly feel it. This doesn't make them suddenly Aristotelian logicians. It leaves them more like chickens with their heads cut off.
    11
  33. 11
  34. 11
  35. 10
  36. 10
  37. 10
  38. 9
  39. 9
  40. 9
  41. 9
  42. 8
  43. 8
  44. 8
  45. 8
  46. 8
  47. 8
  48. 7
  49. 7
  50. 7
  51. 7
  52. 7
  53. 7
  54. 7
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 6
  58. 6
  59. 6
  60. 6
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. 6
  65. 6
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 5
  70. 5
  71. 5
  72. 5
  73. 5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. 5
  87. 5
  88. 5
  89. 5
  90. 5
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. Too many people leap to the dopey assumption that "The Chinese are taking over the world." The opposite is the truth: China is succeeding by adopting much of what is best of the west. They've adopted the British Industrial Revolution. 19th-Century German applied science, and a few dribs and drabs of Anglo-German Marxism -- Hegelian hooey married to billiard-ball physics and the best of Victorian-age charitable social policy. They tried Leninism for a while but it was crushed in blood by Chiang Kai-Shek in 1929 and its remnants ground into the mud by Stalin over the succeeding generation. One might have thought that the reforms of Deng Xiao-Ping would have some relation t the thought of the English industrialist Freidrich Engels. This didn't happen, because Engels never stirred any knowledge he might have gained in his factories into his politics. I think he has only made two contributions to world history, buying Karl Marx a few years' groceries and writing some hilariously self-parodic sections of The Communist Manifesto, in which the manifesto denounces bourgeois prigs exactly like, wait for it, Freidrich Engels. The current main program of China is Xi Jin-Ping thought, essentially Western supply-chain management writ large. Very large. This he may have learned during his stay in Kansas in which case it would be a curious mix of political strains: the political economy of the American Midwest is pretty much Stalinism, "socialism plus electricity equals communism," moderated by the Shredded Wheat practicality of Vice-President Henry Wallace, a stumble-bum Red but to hi credit a sound agronomist. It would make perfect sense if America's "Red States" had been given in honour of Wallace's love affair (at a safe distance) with Stalinism, but the seems not to have happened. Neither are they called red because of their budgets, always in deficit and bailed out by Washington. Perhaps it's because so many of their politicians are so perennially apoplectic from jumping up and down denouncing the socialism and the Washington on which they are so totally dependent. But China didn't export all this red stuff to us. It crossed the Pacific from America to China, and Eurasia via the Trans-Siberian Railroad, but mostly from Marx in the British Museum. They aren't going to conquer us because we have already conquered them. What happens next is, the Trump interlude fades into the mists, and sensible people get on with the Great Mixing. Here's the History: The Gunpowder Years: 1400 to 1945, with raggedy edges at both ends. Europe conquers the world, including a number of cultures superior to its own, through the wanton use of gunpowder. The European War: 1908 to 1998, from the North African Naval Crisis through the rise and then collapse of Imperialism, Fascism, and Marxism. Huge death resulting in developing peace. The Great Mixing: 1868 to 2150, from the Black Ships introducing America to Japan (already acclimatizing itself to Holland, Korea, and Britain) through the admixture of China and America, Adam Smith plus Buddha, etc. etc.
    2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. +Devin Waddell Devin, "Failed policies" is the whimper of a guy who didn't invest when Bush left the Dow-Jones at six thousand and change, before No Drama Obama brought it back up into Clinton-type territory, north of 16,000. Better luck next time. Trump does not have better sense in business. Trump has not made a cent in business since his father died. The old man was an excellent developer of working-class housing, and made enough money at it to bail poor little Donald out every now and then. For a Google giggle, search on "Trump, Plaza Hotel." And laugh. The guy has the judgment of a kid in a candy store, and the poor banks financed him because they thought Daddy was part of this "Trump Organization" thingie. He was -- until he wasn't. Little Donald can't borrow in New York anymore without Daddy around, and has to hustle his funnypaper in Hong Kong and the Middle East. I'm not sure having a President in debt in those two places is a terribly wise idea... Trump's claimed net worth now, a little over $4 billion, is less than his shareholders' and creditors' losses in his companies' serial bankruptcies. I.e. the guy is a net net business parasite. Luckily he was able to land an honest job, playing the part of a loud-mouthed businessman on TV. This seems to have paid fairly well. He's probably unusual for a Republican in hiding his taxes because they show how little, not how much, he's worth. There's a new free app called "Grammarly" out there, and you should take a look at it. It's much too American in its promiscuous use of the Harvard comma, but it would save you from the several errors that mar your post above. https://www.grammarly.com/ Cheers, -dlj.
    1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. Anonymous Troll @Bluesjet1234 , Neither one of them is organized. Both of them are slogans and both of them have roots in the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s and before. "Black lives matter" is a simple slogan meaning "a black life is as important as a white life; you don't have the right to just forget some poor guy killed at random by the police because he's black," get it? AntiFa was a small group of lefties at Berkeley and was probably organized enough to have coffee together once a week -- all six of them. They only went national when the Republicans i the Senate gave up on being Republicans and became straight no-balls Trumpoids. At that point, a lot of young people said "This is Fascism and I'm against it." Still no organization, just a lot of people sharing a slogan. There is an underground press, and some of them talk to one another, a lot of them hate each other. "too pornographic," "too much sports news," all that kind of crap. The only organization is the Internet, and the most organized thing on the Internet is "a rouble a post" trolls and their script-kiddie followers in the West, a sad bunch of little losers. They aren't thugs, and they aren't organized. The biggest damage is that done to the RNC by their moronic PR people who -- back when they had money -- flooded TV with fake ads showing Philippine students and Ukrainian cops, five years and five thousand miles away from each other, but all noisy. They end up with mud on their faces broke and tarred with a lot of dirty tricks, all of which they put up with, few of which they actually commissioned, and every ounce of every one dishonorable and un-American. There is a tiny number of drunks, of Trotskyites and Black Flag anarchists, and a few old H. Rap Brown (look it up) disorganized Blacks. That's the only thing out there that corresponds to your fantasies, Suck on it, nameless Bluesjet: you're a sucker for Hannity, Trump, and a bunch of lunatics and clowns.
    1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615.  @kohlcooke8789  Biden isn't trying to beat "angry Bernie fans." Most Bernie fans are liberals or Social Democrats, which means they are pretty close to Biden and will support him. There are a few hundred thousand Red Diaper babies out there, children of Communists. Some of these people, perhaps ten or twenty thousand in the entire country are not particularly "political" in any civic or contributory sense. They are emotional outsiders, often rightwing extremists. Of the political ones, and now we're down to probably one-digit thousands, many believe in the olde tyme Leninist doctrine of "le pire le mieux," the worse is better -- making things bad will bring their revolution faster. These are your Trump-before-Biden Bernie Bros. They are loud but they are few. You have to keep your eye on the facts. Fact One is that Hillary beat Trump by three million votes. Trump is a glitch in the Constitution, a side-effect of the nasty compromises of 1785~87 when the current Constitution was being written after the failure of the 1776 Articles. Trump is tall, energetic, televisual, confident, and assertive. He's attractive and convincing if you're not paying attention. A lot of people have been sucked in by him, and importantly a lot of special interests, greedheads, reactionaries and the few fascists out there have found him useful. On the other hand he is ignorant, of mediocre intelligence and essentially negative learning, and harmful -- harmful essentially to the interests of the barstool philosopher class who have followed him. If people pay attention and act with good sense, 2020 will be a wipeout of Goldwater-scale proportions. The GOP could be wrecked for a generation, leaving only pieces to be reconstructed in some different way. America no doubt has a place for principled conservatives, an edge party of the Never Trumpers. The Democratic Party of President Obama and the Cllintons stands for capitalism armed to the teeth. There is no viable administrative position to the right of that. that is the centre right, not the center left. America needs a center-left, Social Democratic Party. A reconstruction of the parties has to occupy most of the next few years -- up through the two elections after the 2030 census and redistricting. For the moment the only challenge is getting a return to reasonably normal politics. That is what Biden represents, and the majority of Americans know it.
    1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1