Comments by "" (@TheDavidlloydjones) on "Duck Mechanic" channel.

Torqtorqtorq's overconfident "explanation" makes no sense whatsoever. The pressure differential caused by letting the liquid out without a "vent" letting air in cannot possibly generate a pressure greater than that of the weight of liquid itself -- exactly what the tanker was designed to handle. What has probably happened here is that a drop in ambient temperature, a change in the weather, has caused the vapour form of a previous, volatile, cargo to re-liquefy. A large volume of gas turning into a very small volume of liquid leaves most of the large volume filled with vacuum -- with the result shown.
4
@monicamac2122 Careful, Monica: he didn't explain anything. He is a shoddy thinker and his post is nonsense. If you want to understand it, read Daniel Fantino's posts, which are sound.
4
@richardriggs4413 It's not unbelievable, but Torq^3 didn't explain it. He doesn't understand it at all.
3
@danielfantino1714 No "or" here, Daniel. Your suggestion is possible; Torqtorqtorq, who wisely remains anonymous, is blowing smoke. Very stupid smoke: in his world it would never have been possible to get the liquid out in the first place because atomospheric pressure would have kept the last 14 pounds per square inch-worth of cargo pour out. Duh.
1
@torqtorqtorq No, half-wit. If it had been as you say, and as you stupidly repeat here, it would have been impossible for the cargo to flow out in the first place.
1