Comments by "COL BEAUSABRE" (@colbeausabre8842) on "1047 Battlecruisers - Guide 185 (NB)" video.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. OK, I know this will be controversial. They were not battlecruisers. Now what is the definition of a battlecruiser? A vessel armed with capital ship weapons, but sacrificing armor (not being able to resist the guns it carried) for speed. Eleven/Twelve inch guns had been obsolete for capital ship armament since the British introduced the 15 inch and everyone else tagged along with 15 or 16 inch guns. A lot of the dreadnoughts scrapped under the Treaties would have been scrapped anyway as their 12 inch batteries were obsolete. The only reason USS Arkansas was still around was to give the US its full number of ships allowed under the Treaties. So what were the Alaska, Dunkerque, Deutschland and 1047 classes? Dreadnought armored cruisers or as the US Navy called them, Large Cruisers (CB). An armored cruiser had mounted weapons of a lesser caliber than battleship guns (9.2 inch in the RN. 8/10 inch in the USN versus 12 inch in their pre-dreadnoughts) and did not sacrifice armor for speed, being armored to resist guns of the size they mounted. And that is exactly the characteristics of these ships. What about the Scharnhorsts? They are difficult to classify. They did not carry capital ship weapons, but were armored against them - sort of "anti-battlecruisers" - because it was always planned to replace their triple 11 gun turrets with dual 15 inch to make them fast battleships. I guess, I'd throw them into the Large Cruiser category. The reason they were called "battlecruisers" is because the RN couldn't figure out how to rate them. Thus endeth the lesson.
    1