Comments by "COL BEAUSABRE" (@colbeausabre8842) on "HMS Ark Royal (91) - Guide 100 (Extended)" video.
-
11
-
@thunberbolttwo3953 Excuse me, the Seafire was notorious for things like landing gear collapsing, tail hook pulling out and remaining with the arrester cable while the aircraft roared down the deck into the barrier, even having the entire tail pull off, it had the ditching qualities of a submarine. At Salerno, sixty percent of the Seafires were lost due to accidents on the first day
". As a carrier based fighter, the design was a compromise and suffered many losses through structural damage that was inflicted by heavy landings on carrier decks: a problem that continued even with the strengthening introduced by the Mk II. The Seafire had a narrow undercarriage track, which meant that it was not well suited to deck operations.[1] The many modifications had shifted the centre-of-gravity aft, making low-speed control difficult and the aircraft's gradual stall characteristics meant that it was difficult to land accurately on the carrier, resulting in many accidents. Other problems included the basic Spitfire's short range and endurance (fine for an interceptor fighter but not for carrier operation), limited weapons load and that it was dangerous in ditching.
The low point of Seafire operations came during Operation Avalanche the invasion of Salerno in September 1943. Of the 106 Seafires available to the British escort carriers on 9 September only 39 were serviceable by the dawn of D-Day plus Two (11 September).
2
-
1