Comments by "truth advocacy" (@truthadvocacy) on "NYT email slip-up exposes paper's spin on Amsterdam violence, with Asa Winstanley" video.

  1. They are "Arabs" in the same sense as Egyptians and other peoples who have been under Arabo-Muslim rule since the Arab conquest of Western Asia and North Africa. The term is used for all those countries that had adopted the Arabic language as their national language. And Morocco is one of them. It is a linguisitic and cultural term rather than an ethnic one, but is used for the latter as well, for convenience.
    3
  2. 👍 The difference being, this genoicide is happening in front of cameras, WITHOUT any military intervention, because the "right" side is committing the genocide. ICJ's muted indictment of Zi0 war criminals still shows it is under U$ influence. It took only a few weeks to indict Putin of "war crimes", while several months passed before it came up with its watered down indictement of only two Zi0 war criminals! Serbia was the enemy of the West back then, while Israel is not!
    1
  3. Lumping together "Arabs" and Muslims" in the category of "people of color" plays into the hands of Euro-supremacists, and Electronic Intifada is pandering to them, by using the term As "Arabs" and Muslims come in different colors, the right term would be "Non-European", not "people of color", which is a ludicrous conflation of different races, from white to black, of non-European geographical background. People closer to Europe tend who have light or white complexion, quite naturally; and it is an observable anthropological fact.
    1