Comments by "truth advocacy" (@truthadvocacy) on "AiTelly" channel.

  1. Now you know, seeing the videos, what a 99% interception looks like.
    177
  2.  @fritzharun390  They are known as "hypersonics" for their high maneuvrability, not speed per se, as all ballistic missiles are technically "hypersonic": > mach 5. Iran launched a few "Fattah-2" missiles of that type. Judging by the videos, the Arrow 2 and 3 did zero interception, otherwise we won't be seeing all warheads hitting the ground. Those interceptors are designed to intercept at high altitude, and clearly, they failed.
    5
  3. The Arrow 2, for example, can only intercept 14 missiles at a time, but imagine 20 or more incoming missiles. It will get confused. And "14" is a theoretical limit, but not test-proven. Now we know all 4-tier air defense systems were almost useless. "Combat unproven".😂
    5
  4. Most people in north-west Asia, called "Arabs", are not Arabs at all. They were "Arabized" by the Arab conquest from Arabia, that invaded the Persian empire after the death of Mohammed. The Persian empire extended from Egypt to Afghanistan, when it was defeated by Arab armies. But some parts of the Persian empire were not "Arabized", hence we have the so-called "Arabs" and the rest, including Persians, who were islamized but not "Arabized". Those ethnically related to Arabs, are the population living in the Arabian peninsula and bordering areas, but neither in north-west Asia nor north Africa. But those people are so proud of their Arabo-Islamic culture, that they are happy to go along with the misnomer.
    5
  5. The problem is, you are confusing nationalism with religion. Vietnamese who fought the U$ did so, because they were invaded, or because they were mostly Buddhists? Nationalism is the main driving factor in wars against invaders. Palestine is no different. Jihad means fight against invaders.
    5
  6. Yes, but by Iranian prices; not U$'. In the U$, it costs 2 M. And the U$ still doesn't have hypersonic missiles in operation. Still in development.
    4
  7. There was close to zero interception. So, no "fragments".
    4
  8. Yes, by Iranian prices; not U$'. In the U$, it costs 2 M. And the U$ still doesn't have hypersonic missiles in operation. Still in development.
    3
  9. Yemen, in far worse conditions, has a missile and drone arsenal of its own. More impressive achievement, given than it started at much lower level than Iran. True, it got help from Iran, but still. Iran itself was helped by Russia, China, and North Korea.
    2
  10. 5 sites; 200 missiles, according to IRGC!
    2
  11. Iran is the 2nd most powerful after Turkey; Israel is 3rd!
    2
  12.  @slavaavnilov6178  There is video evidence that NONE was intercepted. And we have only a fraction of it. Any video evidence of "interceptions"? Zero!😂
    2
  13. There is video evidence that NONE was intercepted. And we have only a fraction of it. Any video evidence of "interceptions"? Zero!😂 Why has Israel crudely doctored satellite imagery of its two main airbases hit by missiles?🤣
    1
  14. It is not "iron dome". "Iron dome" is the lowest tier of air defense. They have 3 more, defending the upper layers, but all failed.
    1
  15. That's why Western media say, the strikes weren't successful, as there were no civilians killed.
    1
  16. No, you are wrong. That what a 99.99% interception rate looks like.
    1
  17. According to western media, the strikes were a failure, because there were no civilians killed. Got their logic?
    1
  18. Israel's air defense system, all "combat unproven".
    1
  19. 👍
    1
  20. Too scared of missiles, like the whole population and military.
    1
  21.  @michaelkoninmu4395  If so, they couldn't land back.😂
    1
  22. "Don't forget that several dozen of them were shot down by the US and UK, so it wasn't just Israel." Are you joking, dude? There is video evidence that NONE was intercepted. And we have only a fraction of it. Any video evidence of "interceptions"? Zero!😂
    1