Comments by "truth advocacy" (@truthadvocacy) on "RTL Nieuws New York" channel.

  1. No, the other friend, the Mossad, who had a vested interest in making the US wage war on the Muslim world!
    5
  2.  @Tim22222  Whenever the Zionist régime is suspected of something, even with strong evidence, it's "anti-semitism".😂 The Zionist trail was quite hot, but terrorist Bush II deflected attention from it by pointing to "Bin Laden", a convenient patsy. The owner of the towers was a Jew, who leased them just a few weeks before the incident, by insuring them against terrorist attacks for 2 $billion, and it paid off handsomely. Some coincidence.😂😂😂
    2
  3. That's the idea, meant to be infused in the US herd.
    2
  4.  @MFitz12  Look up videos of controlled demolition to see the similarity between them and what happened to the 3 WTCs, particularly WTC 7. All of them were taken down by controlled demolition, and yes, standard procedure, or classic. The planes were used as a diversion, to make it appear as if they were the cause of the total collapse, because "Muslims" needed to enter the picture. But steel-framed highrises were not known to have collapsed by fire, yet 3 did that same day!
    2
  5. Using 9/11 as a pretext, yes.
    1
  6.  @MFitz12  Heat couldn't have weakened the steel structure to make it fail symmetrically all the way down.😂
    1
  7. The Zionist track was hot, starting from the leasee of the Towers, a Jew. But it was politcally expedient to put the blame on some "Bin Laden", a dissident Saudi who took refuge in Afghanistan, and use Saudis as patsies. Zionists and the US were those who profited from 9/11, by waging war on the Muslim world to control its resources. Cui bono?
    1
  8.  @dovidstaples9985  9/11 has nothing to do with " the earth being flat". No such silly diversion will make any difference, regarding 9/11 facts.
    1
  9.  @Tim22222  Yes, but Bin Laden couldn't possibly have masterminded such a thing from a remote and poor country, Afghanistan, where he had taken refuge. Saudi "hijackers" were used as decoy. The real perpetrators had inside knowledge to pull off 9/11, as they did. And strong evidence points to Mossad and the CIA. 9/11 was a watershed moment for the USA, that invaded Afghanistan, and later Iraq, both countries run by independent leadership, liable to "regime change".
    1
  10. The Zionist track was hot, starting from the leasee of the Towers, a Jew. But it was politcally expedient to put the blame on some "Bin Laden", a dissident Saudi who took refuge in Afghanistan, and use Saudis as patsies. Zionists and the US were those who profited from 9/11, by waging war on the Muslim world to control its resources. Cui bono?
    1
  11. No, the US debt skyrocketed as a result, as the top terror group, the Pentagon, had used 9/11 to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. $trillions spent on wars of terror!
    1
  12.  @mooneyes2k478  "NIST I could see." 😂is a state institution riding on the US regime's agenda. Hence, its flawed report on the collapse of the WTC 1,2, and 7.
    1
  13. All because the US terror regime wanted to invade the Muslim world to steal its resources. And it did, in Iraq at least.
    1
  14. And the USA did just that, starting with Afghanistan, run by an independent Islamic regime, unlike Saudi Arabia. Then the US proceeded to invaded Iraq, under secular rule. Those who profited from 9/11 are the USA and Israel. Cui bono?
    1
  15.  @Tim22222  The "democracy" religion has the most.
    1
  16.  @dovidstaples9985  You are a government-sponsored conspiracy theory believer, so clearly a nutcase. Those who challenge the official conspiracy theory are pointing to incontrovertible conspiracy facts!
    1
  17.  @rjpaws  But the gullible US herd didn't notice that the US regime itself was pushing its own conspiracy theory of "Al Qaeda did it".😂😂 Nothing serious to back up its implausible claim.
    1
  18. Yes, but many have mobile phones.
    1