Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "Sen. Warnock wins Georgia runoff against Walker securing Democratic majority" video.

You are not allowed to include "probablies" that you cannot prove.
4
The "best" candidate does not always win. Who do you think the voters are? 🤷‍♂️ Einstein or somebody?? 🤷‍♀️
2
@le2800 Well I am not in Georgia and do not know the candidates. So I have to take someone else's word on it. But it seems like Georgians are basically divided about which is the best candidate. I think the best candidate would be whomever could best represent the issues of state of Georgia in the Senate -- not all of this personal stuff.
2
Definition of "basic intelligence:" Anyone who thinks my opinion is right.
2
@le2800 Well I have never heard him say anything, but one sentence (which seemed to make good sense). So I do not know if you are quoting him accurately or taking his statements out of context. I will say that I met a homeless guy in front of a Subway restaurant in San Diego who told me werewolves are real and living along the San Diego River. He said some Hollywood movie star (forgot the name) was riding the trolley and is going down there to kill them. Who am I to question a homeless guy? 🤷‍♂️
2
@le2800 Well if you are right about that, there is only one logical conclusion: 49% of Georgians need serious mental help.
2
Why do democrats always say, "the people have spoken." when they win. 🤷‍♀️ It is just their way of bragging about how important they think they are. 🤷‍♂️
1
@Glorytoglorzo Well I could do that. 🤷‍♂️ The first thing I would do is pass a law that anybody driving alone in a car would have to drive an Indycar -- not a sedan. That way I could make the lanes narrower and double-up. Then raise the speed limit to 219 mph so people could get moving and clear the roads for others coming behind them. 🤷‍♀️ (And all of the curves would be banked for safe high-speed travel.) Get rid of stop signs and traffic lights that keep stopping people . . .
1
@ninaduncan2463 Hershel who? Seems like you can tell a lot about a man just by "seeing him." Are you a psychic or a witch or something? You understand that neither psychics or witches operate by intelligence, right?
1
@le2800 I am a Republican and my family has always voted along party lines. It is not a new thing. It has nothing to do with fear or democrats or President Trump. We vote Republican because we fundamentally believe in the principles that are espoused by the party and we want to see those principles enacted. Democrats do the same and vote for the principles that they believe in. Biden did a very poor job the first year, but the Ukraine war saved him. He has done pretty good working with the NATO coalition. However that last speech was very, very divisive. He basically said, "You Republicans are being divisive because you refuse to drop your fundamental beliefs and agree with me. That kind of talk is delusional and just makes people angry. The road to unity is to forget what we believe in??? Come on! And we have ask ourselves WHY Biden is not acknowledging the crisis at our Southern border. If he were doing a good job as president, he would at least mention it and try to do something about it. After all, he caused that crisis just by becoming president. So he should be the first in to try to help out. Your calling President Trump names exposes what kind of person you are. Do I go around calling Biden names?? Biden did more "dividing" in one speech than President Trump did in his entire lifetime.
1
@le2800 It was not hitting below the belt. You brought yourself down to their level by your own choice and you admit doing that. So you have to eat that. You should have enough Integrity and respect for the office of presidency that you would not call any American president anything but Mr. President -- no matter what anyone else says. And also, you should always say what you really mean -- not just change your wording to poke at someone. If you do not really mean it -- do not say it and do not use the wrong words to say it -- adjust your wording accordingly.
1