General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Matthew Loutner
Inside China Business
comments

Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "Detroit auto engineers tear down BYD's Seagull: "An extinction-level event"" video.

@SYL7Tube It does not bother us to have idiots laughing at us.
3
@inktownfishing4505 We did not "steal Hawaii." Hawaii voted to join the United States.
3
@yunko9369 "President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Hawaii Admission Act on March 18, 1959, which created the means for Hawaiian statehood. After a referendum in which over 93% of Hawaiian citizens voted in favor of statehood, Hawaii was admitted as the 50th state on August 21, 1959." Wikipedia
3
@chrisschneiders6734 The average American is doing fine and you do not need to use these filthy expreesions.
2
@etbuch4873 That history lesson has nothing to do with anything. The Phillipines exists today and it is their water now. CCP will not be allowed to be a bully and claim everyone else's water. Besides that your history lesson is wrong. The Phillipines is 500 years old.
2
@yunko9369 Because Iran was shipping illegal contraband oil.
2
@inktownfishing4505 Most countries do want our bases there. We have treaties signed with those countries. It is not necessary for you to keep lying about things.
2
@yunko9369 "Immediately after the adoption of the Bayonet Constitution, the Native Hawaiian population of the Hawaiian Kingdom sought to restore King Kalākaua's power and authority. A committee of Hawaiians met with Kalākaua to discuss dismantling the constitution because the king signed it under duress. According to Thurston, Kalākaua even defended the constitution to protesting natives. Queen Liliuokalani affirmed that he was threatened with violence should he attempt to undo the new constitution. She also said there were several petitions from natives that asked for a new constitution to restore her absolute rule. Out of 9,500 registered voters, 6,500 signed the petitions. Based on this Queen Liliuokalani proposed the removal of power from the legislature in January 1893, by a new constitution that would restore absolute monarchy. In response, the HAWAIIAN LEAGUE overthrew her monarchy and the legislature took control of the country." Wikipedia
2
@yunko9369 Pay attention to your dates. The queen was deposed by her own people in 1893 . . . Hawaii became a state in 1959.
2
@yunko9369 "Samuel Dole sent a delegation to Washington in 1894 seeking annexation, but the new President, Grover Cleveland, opposed annexation and tried to restore the Queen. Dole declared Hawaii an independent republic. Spurred by the nationalism aroused by the Spanish-American War, the United States annexed Hawaii in 1898 at the urging of President William McKinley. Hawaii was made a territory in 1900, and Dole became its first governor. Racial attitudes and party politics in the United States deferred statehood until a bipartisan compromise linked Hawaii's status to Alaska, and both became states in 1959." Source: U.S. state department
2
@somefactssomeopinion So you are saying we can do something in the chip industry that is wrong for China to do in the EV industry? You might want to give some thought to that logic.
2
@jjsmith4829 You have to be joking. My electric blanket burned out in 3 weeks. My toaster oven does not keep the right temperature. My washing machine motor shuts down when it gets hot. My chainsaw stopped running after cutting down just one tree. I cannot run my life because of all of these shoddy Chinese products they keep sending us.
1
@gelinrefira No they do not make what I want. You said yourself that an American company decides that. But that is not always true. I have seen Chinese say that they are cutting quality because their customers do not want to pay more. I seriously doubt that the American company wants them to cut the quality. They should have discussed with the American company that they were going to cut the quality.
1
@verypleasantguy The USA does not produce products. American corporations produce products and most of them have a reputation for producing solid products. I am sure that you can find some exceptions to anything anywhere.
1
@jameshack485 10 years is sufficient time for any appliance to last. If they last that long, it is a wonder of modern engineering.
1
@dltn42 You are going to Hell 🌅 over your filthy language.
1
@CheeLiekHo "Accusing them"? Dude. It is an absolute fact that China has been doing that for the last fifty years.
1
@peltekechum5215 Your comment is reported to utube under misinformation and also hate speech.
1
@hagankeys3610 Your comment is reported to utube under misinformation and hate speech.
1
@jonwick7635 Actually, only one American ever said that. The rest of America can handle China head on.
1
@DW-op7ly If I am right about something, why should I be less biased? I am an inventor. So let me explain how inventions and patents work: In the old days, there were no patents. When somebody had a good idea, everybody just copied it and everybody was happy doing it that way. Even today, an invention can go directly into the public domain if the inventor does not patent his invention. I personally have an invention that I did not patent and everyone has copied it and you can buy it in many stores. I do not get any residuals from my invention, and if you use my invention, I am happy for you. This has been the way of the world for thousands of years. But in the last hundred years or so, thought on patenting has evolved. Specifically, what has evolved is the COST of inventing something. When life was simple, the cost of inventing was small. But the type of inventions that we have in the high-tech modern world can cost a million dollars of research. The cost of the research is why we have patents. If a company spends a million dollars in research, they need some way to recover that money back. The company recovers their money by having the exclusive right to produce and sell their invention for several years. If you short-cicuit the protection process, that company cannot recover their million dollars. If you continue short-circuiting the protection process, that company will go bankrupt and shut down. Any inventions they would have invented in the future will never come into the Earth. If you do that to enough different high-tech-companies, they will all shut down. That will end scientific progress as we know it.
1
@DW-op7ly When I am right about something, why would I want to be less biased?
1
@DW-op7ly Whatever I said, I am right about it
1
@DW-op7ly I do not have any "wrong or outdated info."
1
Dude. The United States is the number two manufacturer in the world with the highest GDP in the world. We are far from incompetent and we could not care less what the world watches or what the world thinks.
1
The United States of America is a sovereign country. No one "rules" us.
1
@alanr2609 Keeping shipping lanes open.
1
@LisaTao You are teaching false CCP brainwashing history. The Phillipines is 500 years old.
1
@yunko9369 Hawaiian Rebellion of 1887 On June 30, 1887, a meeting of RESIDENTS including the armed militia of the HONOLULU RIFLES, a group of soldiers that were secretly the HAWAIIAN LEAGUE's military arm, and POLITICIANS who were members of the Reform Party of the HAWAIIAN Kingdom, demanded from King Kalākaua the dismissal of his Cabinet, headed by the controversial Walter M. Gibson. Their concerns about Gibson stemmed from the fact that he supported the king's authority." WIKIPEDIA
1
@yunko9369 "Starting in 1795 and completed by 1810, Kamehameha I CONQUERED the entire archipelago and formed the unified Kingdom of Hawaii." Wikipedia
1
@yunko9369 "In 1843, the British, under Captain Lord George Paulet, occupied the Hawaiian Islands for five months because of a land dispute involving a Briton, Richard Charlton. Hawaiian sovereignty was restored by Rear Admiral Richard Thomas five months later, who renounced the actions of Charlton and Paulet. In 1849, the French arrived in Honolulu with ten demands for the monarchy, including an end to continued persecution of Catholics and high tariffs on French goods. When these demands were not met in a timely fashion, the French invaded Honolulu and captured the city. They left one month later, after raiding government buildings and other property in Honolulu. In the face of increasing European interest in the islands, Kamehameha III decided to solicit protection from the United States. On March 10, 1851, the King formally applied to the United States Congress to become a protectorate of the United States. Hawaii did not become a protectorate of the United States in 1851, but the seeds were sown for the relationship of dependence that would color the remaining years of the Hawaiian monarchy."
1
@inktownfishing4505 Regardless of the exact conditions, the queen was overthrown by Hawaiian citizens. So your complaint would have to be against the people who did it. The facts in the modern world are that all monarchs, dictators, totalitarians, and fascists are a threat to society and country after country has overthrown their monarchs and instituted a republican form of democracy and rule by the people. The queen got off easy. After the French revolution in 1789, the French people chopped off the monarch's head. The days of kings and queens are over. Modern countries are ruled by their citizens.
1
@inktownfishing4505 We do not have any bases in countries that do not want them (except Cuba). Most countries need protection from their neighbors. Those countries want bases.
1
@yunko9369 The United States did not annex the kingdom. The republic was established for a couple of years before Hawaii was annexed as a PROTECTORATE.
1
@yunko9369 I said that the United States annexed the Republic of Hawaii as a protectorate in 1898. What is the problem?
1
@yunko9369 No it wasn't. The leaders of Hawaii went to the United States government and said, "We want to come under the protection of the United States." Is that your main objection? Give me some time and I will look that up for you.
1
@yunko9369 Did you fail to read where it says: "At the same time, they appealed to the United States . . . " Read it again.
1
@yunko9369 I am not going to argue international sanctions with you because you do not have enough education for that.
1
@yunko9369 "The overthrow was bolstered by the landing of US Marines under John L. Stevens to PROTECT AMERICAN INTERESTS which rendered the monarchy unable to protect itself."
1
@yunko9369 If the U.S. Marines acted without the official U.S. government approval, then it was not a U.S. government action.
1
@yunko9369 It may or may not have been illegal. That would depend on the laws that cover military action or chain of command. At any rate, the United States military is allowed to protect American interests anywhere in the world, and that is what they did. They did not take over the palace. Hawaiians did that. "In 1893 Queen Liliʻuokalani was illegally deposed and placed under house arrest by businessmen." Wikipedia There was no United Nations in 1893.
1
@yunko9369 What are you talking about? All of the facts are right out in public for everyone to see. I posted some. You posted some. How can anyone "twist the facts" when everyone can see them in daylight?
1
@yunko9369 Hawaii was annexed in 1898. The coup was in 1893. There was no queen in 1898. Hawaii was a republic when it was annexed. American businessmen owned pineapple plantations in Hawaii. There were lots of Americans there. The pineapple plantations and associated factories are American interests.
1
@yunko9369 Our military protects American interests and American lives.
1
@yunko9369 "The businessmen who conspired to overthrow the queen claimed that they were overthrowing a corrupt, dissolute regime in order of advance democratic principles. They also argued that a Western foreign power was likely to acquire the islands. Hawaii had the finest harbor in the mid-Pacific and was viewed as a strategically valuable coaling station and naval base. In 1851, King Kamehameha III had secretly asked the United States to annex Hawaii, but Secretary of State Daniel Webster declined, saying "No power ought to take possession of the islands as a conquest...or colonization." Source: Digital History
1
@yunko9369 We are not talking about other U.S. backed coups. But in case you are interested: The policy of the United is to back the people in any country who are trying to get rid of their evil government and set up a democracy run by the people.
1
@yunko9369 Now you are the one lying. Let us start from the timeline: 1893: the Hawaiians deposed their own queen. 1894: the Hawaiians set up a republic government. 1894: the Hawaiians sent a delegation to Washington and requested to be annexed. 1898: the United States annexed Hawaii. The United States did not steal anything. That has been proven by the relevant facts, but you insist on lying about the facts.
1
@yunko9369 In 1893 the Queen tried to overthrow the Hawaiian legislature and the Hawaiian legislature responded by overthrowing the queen and arresting her for her crime. This is a Hawaiian problem. The Hawaiians solved it. It is not a United States problem. Stop lying.
1
@Trueye-sl2mr Bullocks to you. You cannot even get simple facts right: "The NTE Report covers significant barriers, whether they are consistent or inconsistent with international trading rules. Tariffs, for example, are an accepted method of protection under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994. Even a very high tariff does not violate international rules unless a country has made a commitment not to exceed a specified rate,"
1
@yunko9369 You are the kid. You can explain the difference between internal and external. But you cannot get that Hawaii was INTERNAL when all of the facts are staring you right in the face. (Actually, you can get it and you do get it. But you just do not want to admit it because it does not fit the narrative that you choose to believe.) The facts are clear that the United States did not overthrow Hawaii. So just stop lying and admit it. These are the facts: The queen illegally attempted to overthrow the legitimate government of Hawaii. THEREFORE . . . the legitimate government of Hawaii requested help from the United States in arresting the CRIMINAL queen. That is INTERNAL.
1
@yunko9369 An election is from THE PEOPLE.
1
@yunko9369 When we were ruled by a monarch, we invited other countries to come help us interfere with our government and they came and helped us. Therefore, we always come when the people call us for help.
1
@yunko9369 I told you before that all monarchs, dictators, totalitarians and fascists are illegal. We do not overthrow them -- their own people do that. Saddam Husein is the only dictator overthrown from the outside, and that was done by the whole international community working together.
1
@yunko9369 So when you run out of facts, you have nothing left to say but to just say the other person is lying? Instead of calling the other person a liar when you find out that you are wrong, why don't you just change your brainwashing?
1
@yunko9369 "Marshal Lon Nol (Khmer: លន់ នល់, also លន់ ណុល; 13 November 1913 – 17 November 1985) was a Cambodian politician and general who served as Prime Minister of Cambodia twice (1966–67; 1969–71), as well as serving repeatedly as defence minister and provincial governor. As a nationalist and conservative, HE LED the military coup of 1970 against Prince Norodom Sihanouk, abolished the MONARCHY, and established the short-lived Khmer REPUBLIC."
1
@yunko9369 What atrocities? Vietnam invaded Cambodia. There was a war going on. Of course there are going to be "atrocities" during a war. Are you stupid or something??
1
@yunko9369 I told you before that we continue in helping any HOME-GROWN attempt to overthrow a dictator. How long are you going to continue to ignore your brainwashing?
1
@yunko9369 The information saying that Iraq had WMDs came from the German intelligence services -- not the U.S. Germany made a mistake. Anyone can make a mistake. Making a mistake is not brainwashing. How long are you going to ignore your brainwashing?
1
@yunko9369 How would you feel if Iraq did have WMDs and we did nothing . . and then a situation would come up where Iraq used WMDs against you? If you were still alive, you would be blaming us for not doing anything. You want to blame the United States when we do something, and you want to blame the United States when we do not do anything. All you want to do is blame the United States for everything in the world. You are brainwashed.
1
@yunko9369 I am speaking for you and you cannot change my subject with fake analogies. How long are you going to ignore your communist brainwashing against the democratic United States?
1
@yunko9369 Dude. North Vietnam invaded Cambodia. We were defending Cambodia. If you have a problem with that, take it up with North Vietnam, who started it. Where was North Vietnam's human rights policy?????
1
@yunko9369 No they don't. And that is exactly my point. Where is their human rights? And why are you arguing with someone who has human rights? You should be arguing in North Korea to help them get human rights. But all you are looking for is a way to blame the United States because you are brainwashed.
1
@yunko9369 Guy. I have been listening to you talk for a while and I have a conclusion: You are lacking in love, compassion, empathy and understanding. I am not hearing from you any love for the Hawaiians, no love for the Cambodians, no concern for the Vietnamese, no understanding for the Iraqis, no concern for the Americans. All you have in your heart is your talking points to prove to me that America is "bad." You are brainwashed.
1
@Trueye-sl2mr Bullocks to you. 😊
1
@AIPretendingToBeHuman Dude. Your comment is stupid and ignorant. The United States is the number 2 manufacturer in the world and the number one in GDP. How does that equate with "weak and cannot compete" ??
1
@nicerides9224 You do NOT want BYD building cars here. That is the Chinese brand that bursts into flames in China about once a week.
1
@alexlawcb When people deserve double standards, we give them double standards.
1
@cguy2guy511 Wrong. YOU have double standards. 😂😂😂
1
@somefactssomeopinion We subsidize our EVs.
1
@somefactssomeopinion Are these your words? "I do not believe tariffs are generally a good thing . . . However . . . "
1
@DW-op7ly It is not "luck." God provides for the United States. China is currently in very deep financial trouble. Trying to reciprocate would put them under. Besides, we buy most of what the Chinese manufacture. If we shut off our buying, every factory in China would close. They could not reciprocate that because we buy from them -- they do not buy from us.
1
@rais1953 1. We buy 16% of what China manufactures and stopping 16% of their income would SHUT CHINA DOWN. 2. In the United States, it would cause shortages of some products. But we would still have our money to open our own factories for those products or buy from other countries. Yes our own economy "could stand doing that." 3. We have already put "major obstacles" in the way of Chinese manufacturers. Two years ago, we put 26% import tariffs on Chinese goods. The result of doing that is a massive exodus of Chinese manufacturers from China into its surrounding neighbors. Do some checking because that is happening NOW and the Chinese economy is currently collapsing. There is not a measurable effect in the United States. 4. China already has "started looking for other suppliers for their U.S. imports." They started buying more corn from Brazil and wheat from Russia and more oil from Saudi Arabia. We just sell our commodities to the countries that China was buying from before they switched. So what? I know what I am talking about when I speak. You "dream on."
1
@guguigugu Just raised to 40%. There is an additional 40% sales tax the Chinese consumer must pay if it is an extra large car or engine.
1
@rais1953 Al of the stuff you just said cannot happen has already happened for the past 2 years. The United States of America 🇺🇲 is in the driver's seat. You "dream on."
1
@yangerjamir0906 And what "double standard" would that be?
1
And you are going to Hell 🌅 for swearing.
1