Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

  1. 21
  2. 16
  3. 14
  4. 12
  5. 12
  6. 11
  7. 10
  8. 10
  9. 8
  10. 8
  11. 7
  12. 7
  13. 7
  14. 7
  15. 7
  16. 7
  17. 7
  18. 7
  19. 7
  20. 7
  21. 6
  22. 6
  23. 6
  24. 6
  25. 6
  26. 6
  27. 6
  28. 6
  29. 6
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35.  @eduardoreyes4958  You make some good points. But there are two sides to every coin. 1. United States is the economic powerhouse of the world and has been pumping $564 billion a year into the Chinese economy for the last 32 years. So China could not have done that without the two-party free-market economic system of the United States. 2. CCP has been bull-dozing Christian churches and Muslim mosques. Is holding a good job a fair trade-off for having your culture and your religion destroyed? 3. What about the "Great Firewall" that keep Chinese citizens completely in the dark about what is going on is the rest of the world? Is being lied to and controlled by the propaganda of your own government really good for the people?? Would you want to live in a gigantic cult or know the truth of things? How can that be good?? 🤷‍♀️ 4. What happens when the CCP decides to attack the United States? With a one-party system who can question the government and say, "This is not a good idea." ??? I assure you that when World War III is over, everything that China built will lie in ruins. So where is the advantage in any of it? 🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♀️ Also, how do you know that a two-party government would not have accomplished as much?? 🤷‍♂️ You are making an assumption there. With the United States pumping up China's economy for 32 years, maybe a two-party system would have been just as good . . . without the pitfalls. Considering that the United States has a two-party system and is the richest country in the world, one cannot assume that a two-party system keeps a nation in poverty. (and you are forgetting that they stole most of the science and technology from the United States who developed it under a two-party system.)
    5
  36. 5
  37. 5
  38. 5
  39. 5
  40. 5
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4