Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "Trump Asks SCOTUS To Reverse Ruling That Gave DOJ Access To Classified Documents" video.

So now we know where you got your screen name.
4
Fascism? Who is it? Hitler? Mussolini? The democratic party?
3
He is guilty of what? There is no United States law saying he has to turn in the documents within a certain time frame.
2
Dude! There are almost 2 million homeless people living in "super-rich" India.
2
Nothing. He just does not want the DOJ searching through the papers trying to find something. We call that a "witch hunt."
2
@FrankBurnham Lier is the same thing as liar . . . only spelled phonetically. 🤷‍♀️ 🤷‍♂️
2
@FrankBurnham Yes. I heard about those new-fangled government schools. I graduated high school in 1976 and received an excellent education. When I was in fifth grade, I was reading poems by a very famous American poet named James Whitcomb Riley. Try looking up one of his poems on the internet and you will see some really weird spelling. James Whitcomb Riley is from Greenfield, Indiana, a short distance outside of Indianapolis. My grandfather was James William Reilly and we lived in Indianapolis. So I was naturally attracted to his poems. It is generally accepted in literature to spell words the way you would pronounce them, as long as you are fully aware and that is your intention for your book or poem. That is called "writing in dialect." It allows the reader to "hear" the word exactly as it was spoken. For example: Black people in the South used to call hot cakes "hoe cakes." So you will see it spelled that way in old literature when a Black person is being quoted. But spelled hot cakes when a White person is being quoted.
2
Depends on what the case is about. I have had 3 cases thrown out in my life -- you just have to ask. They nearly always throw out speeding tickets when requested.
2
I give the Supreme Court an A+ approval rating. They are doing a Supreme job! 😎👍🇺🇸 ✝️
2
@patzeuner8385 You really do not know what United States law says about it do you? But you are spouting jibberish and legal statements as if you really knew the law. Do you really consider that wise?
1
@SmackWaterMack001 I do not believe his intent is to deliberately cause injury to the United States. Do you? I hardly see the possibility that a box of documents sitting in a storage room can "cause injury" to anybody. And he did not "obtain" the information. As president, he already legally had it in his possession.
1
That would be me. 😎👍🇺🇸 ✝️
1
@meoff7602 That happened to me once. The police pulled me over because I had long hair and did an illegal search of my car looking for drugs. So that was a fishing expedition? How would you define a witch hunt?
1
@CrankyDoodleDandy No. I am not forgetting anything. I remember important things like ... . Do not pass judgment on any person's actions until you hear their side of the story. The president had every right to have those documents in his possession. The only question is why he kept them for such a long time after he was out of office. I am waiting for him to explain himself. Then we will see. The whole rest of you appear like a lynch mob to me.
1
@krusty5347 President Trump is not going to be "president for life" because there are term limits in the Constitution. I am voting a straight republican ticket. Suit yourself.
1
@MrTomemac President Trump has not broken any laws and is not "in deep doo doo" and he will not be in "further trouble" because he is not in trouble now.
1
@estherfawcett1612 You are so good at making up complete conspiracy theories and other fabrications and fairy tales, maybe you should become a novelist and do it full time. 🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♀️
1
@estherfawcett1612 You started going off course when you said President Trump took a payoff. No American president is going to do that. But it works great in a suspense novel.
1
@outdoorsinthenorthwest9763 He can't be guilty moron. He has to be charged with some crime first.
1
Alright Sherlock. Are you going to be in a book or a movie?
1
Flight risk? 🤷‍♀️ You mean in Airforce One? 🤷‍♂️ 😅🤣😂😆😀
1
@marih3286 Are you joking? 🤷‍♀️ 🤷‍♂️ President Trump can land anywhere in the world. Everyone all over the world loves him (with the minor exception of democrats in the United States). 😎👍🇺🇸✝️
1
The DOJ cannot indict him because they cannot find any valid law he broke to charge him with. That is why they want to look through the documents. It is called a "witch hunt."
1
Breaking the law is NEVER a "small mistake."
1
@MrTomemac There is no joke and it is not on us. All of the courts in the land do their jobs properly.
1
That is a dumb thing to say. 🤷‍♂️ How could President Trump corrupt the courts? 🤷‍♀️ People corrupt themselves -- no one does it for them.
1
Does the entire DOJ have a top secret clearance?
1
@SmackWaterMack001 Because if they don't, they cannot have access to any classified documents.
1
@SmackWaterMack001 Why do I care? Because a United States law is being broken by the very authorities who are charged with enforcing the law. That is NAZI Germany gestapo stuff here in 21st century America. That should be a concern of every American citizen. Apparently, you do not care who breaks the law as long as they get your enemy President Trump. And THAT should concern every American citizen.
1
@SmackWaterMack001 First name a specific United States law that President Trump has broken. If you can do that (and get it right), I will deal with the other questions.
1
@SmackWaterMack001 Trump is coming back -- learn to cope. I will be dismissed when I say so. President Trump is not in violation of the Espionage Act. Do you care to try again?
1
@SmackWaterMack001 You really do not like it when you run across someone who is tough enough to stand up to your bullying . . Do you? Do not feel bad about that. Your president Vladimir Putin does not like either.
1
@SmackWaterMack001 Still waiting for you to name a specific United States law that President Trump has violated . . . . ⏳
1