Comments by "Matthew Loutner" (@Matthew_Loutner) on "Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from ballot for violating Constitution" video.

Well I think that FIRST they need to prove that there was an "insurrection." 🤔
122
It is contained in the body text of the constitution and other states have a different opinion on this because . . . 1. There was no insurrection. 2. President Trump had nothing to do with what did happen.
40
@ombrezz7030 You just admitted by your own words that you do not know what an insurrection is. 🤷‍♀️ 🤷‍♂️
8
@rainmanjr2007 Personally I only believe things that are factually true. If you want to believe things that are only true in your own mind, it is okay with me. 🤷‍♂️
4
@marcusgarvey6231 That has absolutely nothing to do with whether it was an insurrection or not. They still have to PROVE that it was. (And the facts are not on their side.)
3
@susansmith323 It was not a riot either. It was a resistence.
3
@TooSweet4You No the court did not. Please go educate yourself.
2
@chipmunkshavenuts What "you all saw" was NOT an insurrection, troll.
2
@purefoldnz3070 So when you have nothing intelligent or meaningful to say you just make up some drivel?
2
@Roger-fm1yf You have the most solid response because it is very difficult to argue with your response.
1
@OberynTheRedViper Let us just agree that you are the one REALLY living in Fantasy Land. You literally believe that you know what a video tells you when no none has explained the context of the video for you. I thank God that I am not dumb enough to make that type of invalid assumption. 🤷‍♂️
1
 @realpolitik2617 What I wish is that the 3 states who submitted FAKE electoral votes had all gotten put in jail where they belong.
1
 @TooSweet4You Wrong. They "assumed" the point. They did not PROVE that there was an insurrection. They still have to PROVE IT. (Which they cannot.)
1
@chipmunkshavenuts Excuse me, but there is 4000 hours of video of this event and it is posted on Congress' website. We are not guessing about what happened that day.
1
@purefoldnz3070 Regardless of what you think of my "stand up routine" I am right. Go back to your padded cell and laugh. That is bothering the (normal) guests.
1
@bruxi78230 You did not see an "insurrection" on TV dude. So I guess I need to explain it for you: 1. There was an election in 2020 2. A lot of democrats cheated in the election. 3. Three states cheated in their own election. 4. Those 3 states attempted to submit their fake cheating votes to Congress. 5. A patriotic group of people attempted to stop them and are American heroes. That is what you saw on TV dude.
1
@thomasgormly6941 Explain how challenging a fake stolen election could be even close to an insurrection.
1
@crownuk4867 I never take a position on things without proof. I would say, "There seems to be something amiss here." 🤔 If there is anything there, it will come out in the investigation.
1
The Supreme Court imposed a list of ethics rules on themselves last week. I have not seen them. But I doubt if he can receive a large gift.
1